Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Cain wrote in
: The angle remains the same? Would you not need a narrower angle to maintain the -3 dB point at center? Could you explain what you mean by -3 dB point at the center and why you want that? The -3 dB point is the angle at which the microphone picks 3 dB less signal than straight forward. For a perfect cardioid pattern that's 65 degrees off-axis (a 130 degree spread). For a hypercardioid pair I recall that it's closer to 55 degrees. Summing the -3 dB level in two microphones of uncorrelated signal gives you back the original volume level, so two cardioids spread to 130 degrees would have the same volume at the center as a single microphone pointed dead ahead. Some will say that the center signal of a stereo pair is highly correlated and therefore the -6 dB point sums to full volume. With a cardioid pair, that's a 180 degree spread (the "omni from summed cardioids" equation). This applies to highly correlated signal. I find in practice that such close correlation seldom happens, and the -3 dB value is more useful. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
mixing in a subway | Audio Opinions | |||
Mixing, Any additional suggestions? | Pro Audio | |||
Mixing, Any additional suggestions? | Pro Audio | |||
Some Mixing Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
DAW-based Mixing: come up or down? | Pro Audio |