Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve King" wrote in message
... My vote would be for FastEdit. But, I, too, mourn the loss of CoolEdit --- the two-track version. However, CooleEdit Pro 1.xx runs just fine on my ancient IBM Thinkpad with 333 Mhz processor and 256 Mb ram. I'm sure it would choke when mixing a bunch of tracks, but I've not encountered that in my work, which rarely uses more than five or six tracks. Thing is, if you stay in the edit window of CoolEdit Pro/Audition, you're essentially using CoolEdit 2000, an eminently simple and useful program. One or two keyboard shortcuts are missing, but otherwise, you need record-and-save capability, you got it. Peace, Paul |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
Note to Trevor | Audio Opinions | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 2/5) | Car Audio |