Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I know that using 1/4" jacks for speakers is generally frowned upon, but - is it ok for using with a 15 watt valve amp ? My Laney combo has a built-in switched 1/4" jack for an extension speaker cabinet - cutting out the internal speaker when used, so Laney obviously think it'll do. However, I'm trying to work out the best way to stick a removeable attenuator between the amp and the speaker, and I have a plan of just putting another switching 1/4" jack in the speaker cable between the amp output and the speaker. I could take the feed to the attenuator from the extension cab socket and then feed it back to the speaker via the new jack, but I'm a bit concerned that when the attenuator is not connected (and therefore when I'm gigging with it), the signal will now be going through two 'empty' 1/4" jacks instead of just the one - and that may increase the chances of failure at a gig - especially if 1/4" jacks aren't really designed to handle 15 watts of amp output. What do you think ? Cheers, Kev. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Hi, I know that using 1/4" jacks for speakers is generally frowned upon, but - is it ok for using with a 15 watt valve amp ? My Laney combo has a built-in switched 1/4" jack for an extension speaker cabinet - cutting out the internal speaker when used, so Laney obviously think it'll do. However, I'm trying to work out the best way to stick a removeable attenuator between the amp and the speaker, and I have a plan of just putting another switching 1/4" jack in the speaker cable between the amp output and the speaker. I could take the feed to the attenuator from the extension cab socket and then feed it back to the speaker via the new jack, but I'm a bit concerned that when the attenuator is not connected (and therefore when I'm gigging with it), the signal will now be going through two 'empty' 1/4" jacks instead of just the one - and that may increase the chances of failure at a gig - especially if 1/4" jacks aren't really designed to handle 15 watts of amp output. Since most amp manufacturers routinely use 1/4" jacks for amps up to 100 watts I think we'd all know by now if there were any serious issues with doing so. Several 1/4" jacks in series ought to easily handle 15 watts. rd |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RD Jones wrote:
wrote: I know that using 1/4" jacks for speakers is generally frowned upon, but - is it ok for using with a 15 watt valve amp ? My Laney combo has a built-in switched 1/4" jack for an extension speaker cabinet - cutting out the internal speaker when used, so Laney obviously think it'll do. However, I'm trying to work out the best way to stick a removeable attenuator between the amp and the speaker, and I have a plan of just putting another switching 1/4" jack in the speaker cable between the amp output and the speaker. I could take the feed to the attenuator from the extension cab socket and then feed it back to the speaker via the new jack, but I'm a bit concerned that when the attenuator is not connected (and therefore when I'm gigging with it), the signal will now be going through two 'empty' 1/4" jacks instead of just the one - and that may increase the chances of failure at a gig - especially if 1/4" jacks aren't really designed to handle 15 watts of amp output. Since most amp manufacturers routinely use 1/4" jacks for amps up to 100 watts I think we'd all know by now if there were any serious issues with doing so. The main issue is that the hot pin (i.e. the tip) is unprotected and can give a shock if the amp is powerful enough. 15 watts, no real problem. But 1000 watts? That's almost 90 volts assuming an 8 ohm load. Not recommended. Another problem is that it can short to ground, and most amps don't like operating into a zero ohm load. Some hate it so much they commit suicide if you try to make them do it. //Walt |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I know that using 1/4" jacks for speakers is generally frowned upon, but - is it ok for using with a 15 watt valve amp ? My Laney combo has a built-in switched 1/4" jack for an extension speaker cabinet - cutting out the internal speaker when used, so Laney obviously think it'll do. I dunno. With 15 watts, it's not going to get hot, but it will still be unreliable when the connectors get old. Do you care about that? However, I'm trying to work out the best way to stick a removeable attenuator between the amp and the speaker, and I have a plan of just putting another switching 1/4" jack in the speaker cable between the amp output and the speaker. I could take the feed to the attenuator from the extension cab socket and then feed it back to the speaker via the new jack, but I'm a bit concerned that when the attenuator is not connected (and therefore when I'm gigging with it), the signal will now be going through two 'empty' 1/4" jacks instead of just the one - and that may increase the chances of failure at a gig - especially if 1/4" jacks aren't really designed to handle 15 watts of amp output. 15 watts is nothing.. I see guys running hundreds of watts through 1/4" jacks. Which is a bad idea if you ask me, but people do it. If I were you, I'd use Speakons. They are designed for the job, more reliable for the application, and lock in place. The disadvantages are that they don't make switching ones, and they can be difficult to find at four in the morning when you have to improvise something. What do you think ? I think you can do better than 1/4" but you can do worse too. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Hi, I know that using 1/4" jacks for speakers is generally frowned upon, but - is it ok for using with a 15 watt valve amp ? Bewa If anyone trips on the cable and pulls the plug out, the amp will be left without a load. This doesn't matter to a transistor amp, but a valve amplifier with an unloaded output transformer will develop very high internal voltages. These can flash-over inside the valves, arc across the valve bases or burn through the insulation inside the output transformer. Some valve amplifiers used to arrange a loading resistor which was switched across the transformer secondary when the jack plug was removed from the amp, but that doesn't protect it if the plug comes out at the speaker end. I would be inclined to use some sort of captive connector and permanently wire a resistor (68 ohms 2 watts) across the back of the speaker terminals inside the amplifier. The loss of a couple of watts is trivial compared with the cost of repair if anything goes badly wrong. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
Another problem is that it can short to ground As it's a valve (US:tube) amplifier in this case, that won't be a problem. -- Anahata -+- http://www.treewind.co.uk Home: 01638 720444 Mob: 07976 263827 |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that using 1/4" jacks for speakers is generally frowned upon,
but - is it ok for using with a 15 watt valve amp ? My Laney combo has a built-in switched 1/4" jack for an extension speaker cabinet - cutting out the internal speaker when used, so Laney obviously think it'll do. Never mind the type of plug, it is important that tube amps are connected to the proper impedence to avoid damage to expensive components (the tubes and output transformer). Attenuating a tube amp's output is generally a bad idea, and trying to get more "tube sound" from a modern tube amp by driving it hard isn't especially effective. Frankly with the effectiveness of tube modeling devices these days, there's scant reason to use tube amps anymore unless you go vintage. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zigakly wrote:
Never mind the type of plug, it is important that tube amps are connected to the proper impedence to avoid damage to expensive components (the tubes and output transformer). Attenuating a tube amp's output is generally a bad idea, and trying to get more "tube sound" from a modern tube amp by driving it hard isn't especially effective. Why? The whole point of using a proper attenuator is that the amp DOES see the correct impedance. Now, admittedly you don't get the speaker break-up at high levels that you do running the amp full out, and that misses a whole lot of the tone, but that's just a sonic issue, not a question of doing damage. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
they don't REALLY commit suicide, what actually happens is that you let the
smoke out of the resistors, capacitors and power transistors... ![]() -- =Kevin Kienlein - Entertainer/Inspirational Speaker =Vernon, BC, Canada =See my NEW WEBSITE http://www.kevinkienlein.com =Never give in, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER! =Life is the Gig, THIS AIN'T NO REHEARSAL! =Age 45/Tricuspid, Atresia, Atrial & Vent, Septal Defects. =My Congenital Heart Defects "Walt" wrote in message ... RD Jones wrote: wrote: I know that using 1/4" jacks for speakers is generally frowned upon, but - is it ok for using with a 15 watt valve amp ? My Laney combo has a built-in switched 1/4" jack for an extension speaker cabinet - cutting out the internal speaker when used, so Laney obviously think it'll do. However, I'm trying to work out the best way to stick a removeable attenuator between the amp and the speaker, and I have a plan of just putting another switching 1/4" jack in the speaker cable between the amp output and the speaker. I could take the feed to the attenuator from the extension cab socket and then feed it back to the speaker via the new jack, but I'm a bit concerned that when the attenuator is not connected (and therefore when I'm gigging with it), the signal will now be going through two 'empty' 1/4" jacks instead of just the one - and that may increase the chances of failure at a gig - especially if 1/4" jacks aren't really designed to handle 15 watts of amp output. Since most amp manufacturers routinely use 1/4" jacks for amps up to 100 watts I think we'd all know by now if there were any serious issues with doing so. The main issue is that the hot pin (i.e. the tip) is unprotected and can give a shock if the amp is powerful enough. 15 watts, no real problem. But 1000 watts? That's almost 90 volts assuming an 8 ohm load. Not recommended. Another problem is that it can short to ground, and most amps don't like operating into a zero ohm load. Some hate it so much they commit suicide if you try to make them do it. //Walt |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Attenuating a tube amp's output is generally a bad
idea, and trying to get more "tube sound" from a modern tube amp by driving it hard isn't especially effective. Why? The whole point of using a proper attenuator is that the amp DOES see the correct impedance. If you're implying that modern tube amps are paired with speakers of the wrong impedance, that's news to me. However, the OP is definitely not trying to compensate for any such issue. Now, admittedly you don't get the speaker break-up at high levels that you do running the amp full out, and that misses a whole lot of the tone, but that's just a sonic issue, not a question of doing damage. We're talking about a small Laney combo here, not a vintage plexi stack. There is no significant tone to be expropriated, only damage in the trying. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Stamler wrote:
"Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... On Fri, 19 May 2006 22:39:27 +0100, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: If anyone trips on the cable and pulls the plug out, the amp will be left without a load. This doesn't matter to a transistor amp, but a valve amplifier with an unloaded output transformer will develop very high internal voltages. These can flash-over inside the valves, arc across the valve bases or burn through the insulation inside the output transformer. I used valve amps back when they were all there was. I'm sure speaker cables (on 1/4" jacks) got pulled out sometimes. I can't remember an amp ever blowing up though. Just how worried SHOULD we be? Most amps have some sort of feedback circuit around the output stages, and that should keep problems like this under control. If you're using an amp with absolutely no feedback loop, then worry. (A few single-ended guitar amps ran open-loop. But they were inevitably combo amps, so the odds of having the speaker cable pull out were pretty slim.) Otherwise relax. The chance of a flashover is greatly increased if you are running the amp up to distortion levels, where the feedback is hardly in control and there is a lot of energy stored in the output transformer at each half-cycle. It is even possible that the feedback on an unloaded amplifier is no longer stable. It seemed to me that the O/P might want use the amplifier flat-out for the distortion effect it would produce. Guitar amplifiers have less feedback than Hi-Fi amplifiers so as to run into distortion more gradually. Flashover is a real possibility, I have known it happen on several occasions and have seen the aftermath on units brought in for repair: shorted turns in output transformers and carbonised tracks burned across valvholders. Remember, it is not unusual to have 700v between anodes on a relatively small output stage which is working as intended - when it is unloaded, this can easily rise to several kilovolts. I still use a valve amplifier occasionally for 100v line P.A. work - I designed it to cope with all kinds of load mismatching and there is a permanent loading resistor wired across the output - but I still wouldn't knowingly leave it running off-load for any length of time. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 May 2006 19:54:01 +0100, Laurence Payne
lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote: I used valve amps back when they were all there was. I'm sure speaker cables (on 1/4" jacks) got pulled out sometimes. I can't remember an amp ever blowing up though. Just how worried SHOULD we be? The nature of the problem is flashover from too high an instantaneous voltage. I've also never seen it, but can imagine it being a problem if the amplifier oscillates or is otherwise overdriven without damping. An ordinary Zobel network across the output should be sufficient. IOW, there's nothing magic about being unloaded, but the amplifier can generate big voltages with big dI/dt's. Easy enough to scotch. All good fortune, Chris Hornbeck |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zigakly wrote:
Attenuating a tube amp's output is generally a bad idea, and trying to get more "tube sound" from a modern tube amp by driving it hard isn't especially effective. Why? The whole point of using a proper attenuator is that the amp DOES see the correct impedance. If you're implying that modern tube amps are paired with speakers of the wrong impedance, that's news to me. However, the OP is definitely not trying to compensate for any such issue. No. An attenuator is an L-pad. You have an 8-ohm source coming out of the amp. That goes into an attenuator. The input impedance and the output impedance of the attenuator are both 8 ohms. It goes to a speaker that is an 8-ohm load. The whole point of the attenuator is that it's NOT just a series resistor, and it presents the proper load to the amplifier. Now, admittedly you don't get the speaker break-up at high levels that you do running the amp full out, and that misses a whole lot of the tone, but that's just a sonic issue, not a question of doing damage. We're talking about a small Laney combo here, not a vintage plexi stack. There is no significant tone to be expropriated, only damage in the trying. Hey, there's even interesting tone due to cone breakup in a Pignose. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Hornbeck wrote:
On Sat, 20 May 2006 19:54:01 +0100, Laurence Payne lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote: I used valve amps back when they were all there was. I'm sure speaker cables (on 1/4" jacks) got pulled out sometimes. I can't remember an amp ever blowing up though. Just how worried SHOULD we be? The nature of the problem is flashover from too high an instantaneous voltage. I've also never seen it, but can imagine it being a problem if the amplifier oscillates or is otherwise overdriven without damping. An ordinary Zobel network across the output should be sufficient. The thing is, back when valve amps were all that there was, if you blew out a pair of 6550s, it was just a trip to the corner drugstore to pick up a couple. At worst you'd have to go to the local TV repair shop. These days, it's a bit more difficult, and a whole lot more expensive, so things that once were considered perfectly reasonable aren't any longer. Back in the sixties, the response to cathode stripping problems was just to preventatively replace tubes. These days people look at you like an alien if you suggest that. IOW, there's nothing magic about being unloaded, but the amplifier can generate big voltages with big dI/dt's. Easy enough to scotch. Right, and if the transformer rings badly when it's unloaded, the possibility of damage is worse because you can generate pretty high peak voltages. Not to mention the absolute embarassment on stage. "Sorry, man, I tripped over the cable and it came out." With a speakon it won't come out. Then again, you might knock the whole stack down instead. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
No. An attenuator is an L-pad. You have an 8-ohm source coming out of the amp. That goes into an attenuator. The input impedance and the output impedance of the attenuator are both 8 ohms. It goes to a speaker that is an 8-ohm load. If it presents an 8 ohm impedance in both directions, it would have to be 'pi' network (at the very least). A simple 'L' wouldn't do that. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian Tuddenham wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: No. An attenuator is an L-pad. You have an 8-ohm source coming out of the amp. That goes into an attenuator. The input impedance and the output impedance of the attenuator are both 8 ohms. It goes to a speaker that is an 8-ohm load. If it presents an 8 ohm impedance in both directions, it would have to be 'pi' network (at the very least). A simple 'L' wouldn't do that. Actually most are L-pads, so the speaker sees a lower than usual impedance. I'd be curious if going to a T-pad instead would change the sound in any audible way. The low end might be affected by the source Z. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
how to build RCA jacks... | General | |||
Technics ST-8600 tuner - meaning of the jacks | Tech | |||
Please help me with cassette deck to amp connections | Tech | |||
Loosening XLR jacks? | Pro Audio | |||
Kenwood AV Surround Processor SS-79 Connections | Tech |