Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been trying to learn analogue audio without much success. There
seems to be no more books available anymore that teach the basics of analog audio electronics. I recently purchased a SONY ES cassette deck (TC-KA3ES) and am stuck using it due to my lack of in depth knowledge of audio electronics. For easy recording, when I put a cassette in the unit, I can set the appropriate record level for the tape type by playing the input source and adjusting the REC LEVEL dial properly. This is easy to do and I've done it. The problem comes in when I try to use the advanced features for recording. There is a CALIBRATION button, and associated with it are three dials as follows: 1. BIAS Calibration 2. REC LEVEL Calibration 3. REC EQUALIZER Calibration I followed the directions in the user manual. I adjusted all three dials as per the instructions. Where the confusion on my part comes in has to do with the REC LEVEL calibration dial vs the completely separate REC LEVEL dial when not using the manual calibration option. Using the manual calibration option after pressing the CALIBRATION button, tone signals are generated and placed on the tape while I am making adjustments with the three dials mentioned above. How can the REC LEVEL calibration be correct since it is being done using the test tones rather than my actual input via LINE IN? Can I still using the regular REC LEVEL dial while recording without screwuing up the manual BIAS and REC EQUALIZER adjustments I made? Any and all comments are most welcome. Thank you. BigS |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To make a long story short... The REC LEVEL calibrates the level meters so
that what you record at 0 plays back at 0. This guarantees that you won't set the recording level too high or too low, and that (when using Dolby NR), the Dolby circuits receive the signal -- both during recording and playback -- at the correct level. If this doesn't make sense -- and it probably doesn't -- you'll have to read a book on how analog tape recorders work and are aligned. A detailed explanation would take an awful long time. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BigS wrote:
How can the REC LEVEL calibration be correct since it is being done using the test tones rather than my actual input via LINE IN? Can I still using the regular REC LEVEL dial while recording without screwuing up the manual BIAS and REC EQUALIZER adjustments I made? Yes. The input level control adjusts the level BEFORE the meters. The record level control that you adjust with a screwdriver adjusts the level AFTER the meters. The screwdriver control is calibrated so that the tape overloads around +3dB on the meters. Now you can use the level control to adjust the level of your input so that the signal never goes above that. There is some discussion of alignment in the FAQ although for the most part it is for regular tape machines, which have some additional alignment controls that you won't find on cassette decks. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 May 2006 16:24:21 -0700, BigS wrote:
Where the confusion on my part comes in has to do with the REC LEVEL calibration dial vs the completely separate REC LEVEL dial when not using the manual calibration option. Using the manual calibration option after pressing the CALIBRATION button, tone signals are generated and placed on the tape while I am making adjustments with the three dials mentioned above. How can the REC LEVEL calibration be correct since it is being done using the test tones rather than my actual input via LINE IN? Can I still using the regular REC LEVEL dial while recording without screwuing up the manual BIAS and REC EQUALIZER adjustments I made? Any and all comments are most welcome. Thank you. BigS I have a similar deck. Just follow the instructions and it will be biased up properly for whatever tape you use. You can tweak the bias a little if you want a brighter sound, albeit at slightly higher distortion. Sony has one of the better routines for setting the deck up to tape. -- flatfish+++ "Why do they call it a flatfish?" |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 May 2006 16:24:21 -0700, "BigS" wrote:
How can the REC LEVEL calibration be correct since it is being done using the test tones rather than my actual input via LINE IN? It's connected in the circuitry at a point and voltage level to be equivalent to if you actually fed the signal into the line in jack at same level on the meters. Can I still using the regular REC LEVEL dial while recording without screwing up the manual BIAS and REC EQUALIZER adjustments I made? Yes, of course. That's what the rec level dial is for! The rec level calibration does just that, it CALIBRATES the record level dial so it reads correctly. When you change the bias it changes a lot of things like frequency response, distortion and how much of the signal is retained on tape. the purpose of the record level cal is so that after you have tweaked bias and record eq so it sounds just right for the tape you are using, you then calibrate the record level so that what you see is what you get. That is, the meters read exactly the same during recording as in playback. If you change the bias without compensating by re-calibrating the rec level, the signal will be slightly different in record and playback. The rec level cal should always be the last step in the set up procedure. Does that make sense? Julian |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BigS wrote: I have been trying to learn analogue audio without much success. There seems to be no more books available anymore that teach the basics of analog audio electronics. Betweeen 1996 and 2000, I wrote a monthly series in Recording Magazine called Oops Wrong Button (their title, not mine) which, if you read the whole series, you would have a very good grounding (no pun intended - a couple of the articles had to do with grounding) in all you want to know. I have suggested that they publish those articles as a compendium, but they seem to be more interested in software, interviews with cool producers, and DIY articles on modifying inexpensive mics - all good stuff but little in the way of fundamentals. I seem to be retired from writing for Recording these days so check your library, or eBay for a collection of issues from that period. The problem comes in when I try to use the advanced features for recording. There is a CALIBRATION button, and associated with it are three dials as follows: 1. BIAS Calibration 2. REC LEVEL Calibration 3. REC EQUALIZER Calibration That was covered in one of my articles about analog recorder maintenance. Not the pushbutton method, but the real tweak-the-internals method. Where the confusion on my part comes in has to do with the REC LEVEL calibration dial vs the completely separate REC LEVEL dial when not using the manual calibration option. The Rec Level Calibration sets the amount of magnetization on tape when the meter reads a certain reference level (usually 0 VU) This is something that you can optimize for a particular formulation of tape, just like bias and record equalization. This sounds like a pretty cool recorder to give you external access to these adjustments. How can the REC LEVEL calibration be correct since it is being done using the test tones rather than my actual input via LINE IN? The internal tone generator applies a tone at standard level so you can optimize the performance to the tape. What you're actually doing is calibrating the meter so that it reads 0 VU when you have the level recorded on the tape optimized. Can I still using the regular REC LEVEL dial while recording without screwuing up the manual BIAS and REC EQUALIZER adjustments I made? Yes, and you should. Once the recorder is calibrated to a particular type of tape (manufacturing is usually consistent enough so that you don't need to calibrate for every cassette you insert as long as it's the same brand, and from the same batch - buy it by the carton and calibrate once), use the main Record Level knob so that the meter hits 0 VU on peaks. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you don't have a background in electronics, recorder setup can be
extremely confusing. Several years ago a gentleman from this group stopped by, and I spent several hours demonstrating how to align and set up an open-reel deck. I don't think he got much out of it, because he didn't know much about physics or electronics. This has nothing to do with intelligence, but rather having knowledge that, for the average person, is esoteric. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() William Sommerwerck wrote: If you don't have a background in electronics, recorder setup can be extremely confusing. This has nothing to do with intelligence, but rather having knowledge that, for the average person, is esoteric. That's why I wrote that series of articles - to give that knowledge in a way that most readers could understand it. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The problem comes in when I try to use the advanced features for recording. There is a CALIBRATION button, and associated with it are three dials as follows: 1. BIAS Calibration 2. REC LEVEL Calibration 3. REC EQUALIZER Calibration I followed the directions in the user manual. I adjusted all three dials as per the instructions. Where the confusion on my part comes in has to do with the REC LEVEL calibration dial vs the completely separate REC LEVEL dial when not using the manual calibration option. Using the manual calibration option after pressing the CALIBRATION button, tone signals are generated and placed on the tape while I am making adjustments with the three dials mentioned above. How can the REC LEVEL calibration be correct since it is being done using the test tones rather than my actual input via LINE IN? Can I still using the regular REC LEVEL dial while recording without screwuing up the manual BIAS and REC EQUALIZER adjustments I made? What type of material are you recording and what is your source? The REC LEVEL calibration is largely used as a point of reference but in most audio recording you prefer your tone to come from an outside source. The best measure of where your inputs should be set is indeed the signal you're recording. If you can get a measure of where its peaks seem to be you can set your levels accordingly. A lot of better decks have a limiter which prevents your signal from getting overmodulated once you've set the levels. It is not intended to bring the whole signal down all the time and if you entire signal is consistently way too hot it won't sound good with OR without the limiter but a limite IS good for heading off the occasional peaks which are too hot. Regardless, I would mainly use the material you're recording as a point of reference unless that material as tone at the beginning, which is the exception rather than the rule. The BIAS and REC EQUALIZER settings will be different. BIAS will be according to what type of cassette you use and the EQUALIZER will allow you to adjust the response of certain frequencies. Both of those should be done before you set your REC LEVEL. All the responses have been good - hope this clears some things up. You'll get a feel for it once you've done it a couple of times. Craig http://www.pro-tape.com Adobe - Apple - Avid - Canon - Denon - Digidesign - Fuji - JVC - Lacie - Marantz - Maxell - Nitro AV - Panasonic - Primera - Quantegy - Rimage - Samson - Sennhesier - Sony - TDK and more! Sales/Rentals/Service Authorized Apple Reseller and Service Provider |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thank you all for your assistance!! This is a quantum leap for me in terms of understanding what I'm doing. BigS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sony Rootkits | General | |||
Sony Rootkits | Tech | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |