Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello, I haven't posted here before but here's a question:
I always use an onstage delay for my vocals which goes inline with the mic and before the pa, I have it set up so I unplug whatever mic is at the venue, insert my own XLR-XLR between the mic and my Delay box, then plug the cable that was originally in the mic into the xlr output. Both the input and output on the box I added with a 1:10 ratio on the input and a 1:1 (600 ohm) on the output. I want to do the same thing but build it into a guitar pedal like a wahwha so I can link the sweep pedal to the speed control of an analog delay guitar pedal's guts. I guess what I need to know is if I want to plug balanced mic signals into guitar pedals then out again to the desk also balanced which is the correct ratio/impedance transformer to use for input, and which for output? Any help appreciated, -James |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
splitlips wrote:
I guess what I need to know is if I want to plug balanced mic signals into guitar pedals then out again to the desk also balanced which is the correct ratio/impedance transformer to use for input, and which for output? Little Labs actually builds a box specifically for the application. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
splitlips wrote: I guess what I need to know is if I want to plug balanced mic signals into guitar pedals then out again to the desk also balanced which is the correct ratio/impedance transformer to use for input, and which for output? Little Labs actually builds a box specifically for the application. --scott OTOH, I'd be wary of using a guitar effect box to run my voice through. It probably isn't very high fidelity. OTOH--again--if you're just using it occasionally for effect (and as long as the bypass is a straight-through connection), it could be interesting. Just my $.02...it's your voice and your performance; but there are ways to get the effect you're looking for without compromising signal quality. If it were me, I think I'd split the mic signal, send one side to the board--dry--and the other side through the delay to another channel. Use a MIDI controller with footpedal options (I'm sure they exist). jak |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jakdedert wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: splitlips wrote: I guess what I need to know is if I want to plug balanced mic signals into guitar pedals then out again to the desk also balanced which is the correct ratio/impedance transformer to use for input, and which for output? Little Labs actually builds a box specifically for the application. OTOH, I'd be wary of using a guitar effect box to run my voice through. It probably isn't very high fidelity. OTOH--again--if you're just using it occasionally for effect (and as long as the bypass is a straight-through connection), it could be interesting. That's usually the point, though. If it were me, I think I'd split the mic signal, send one side to the board--dry--and the other side through the delay to another channel. Use a MIDI controller with footpedal options (I'm sure they exist). It is _really_ nice to have consoles with inserts that can be defeated with a button on the channel strip. That way you can put an effects device in the insert, and easily switch it in and out during the performance for when you need the effect on just a word, line, or verse. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
jakdedert wrote: Scott Dorsey wrote: splitlips wrote: I guess what I need to know is if I want to plug balanced mic signals into guitar pedals then out again to the desk also balanced which is the correct ratio/impedance transformer to use for input, and which for output? Little Labs actually builds a box specifically for the application. OTOH, I'd be wary of using a guitar effect box to run my voice through. It probably isn't very high fidelity. OTOH--again--if you're just using it occasionally for effect (and as long as the bypass is a straight-through connection), it could be interesting. That's usually the point, though. If it were me, I think I'd split the mic signal, send one side to the board--dry--and the other side through the delay to another channel. Use a MIDI controller with footpedal options (I'm sure they exist). It is _really_ nice to have consoles with inserts that can be defeated with a button on the channel strip. That way you can put an effects device in the insert, and easily switch it in and out during the performance for when you need the effect on just a word, line, or verse. Yeah, but he's apparently doing it onstage during his performance. jak --scott |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the replys,
Yeah I'm using it on stage and currently am using a dreadful unit roughly modified (80's analog echo box with in/out xformers hacked in) for the job which bolts to the mic stand. It's cumbersome and I want to build the whole thing (Splitter, 2ch mixer, output transformer) into a wah pedal so I can use the pedal to sweep the speed control and the wah footswitch to bypass the whole thing. -James |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA Toroid xformer linear power supply/DA conv. | Marketplace | |||
good non critical iso xformer? | Pro Audio | |||
good non critical iso xformer? | Pro Audio | |||
Xformer iron, bobbins. Where to get? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
about silly xformer fuzzy fluxxy noncurrent thread | Vacuum Tubes |