Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?


"Don Pearce"
Poopie Bear


Yes that is very similar. The great thing about using these discretes
as front ends is that the knee frequency for 1/f noise is way lower
than the transistors in the average op-amp. So not only don't they
hiss - they don't rumble either. Three of them in parallel is about
right for a mic at about 150 to 200 ohms.



** More totally asinine crapology from the Pommy RF Fool.

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise !!

Hence - there is no audible "rumble noise" from mic pres based on op-amps
or transistors.


But what about the current noise?



** With a FET ?

With a 200 ohms source ??

What drugs is this ****ING JERK taking ???

Or not taking ??



Hmmm, I wonder how that would go down with those who 'cheat' by using a
150 ohm source
instead of 200. I note that Mackie ( I think ) is now quoting noise with
the input
*shorted* too.



** Some condenser mics have very low output Zs - less than 20 ohms.

Not wrong to quite the noise for that case.




........... Phil



  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Lostgallifreyan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise !!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF dominate
because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because our ears are more
sensitive to it).
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
GregS
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

In article 0, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise !!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF dominate
because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because our ears are more
sensitive to it).


The noise voltage of many op-amps is almost flat from 1K to 100K, but below 1 K
it moves upward. I'm looking at the LF353 as it has a very low level of low frequency
noise, or at least the chart shows that. The AD711 has 18 nvHz at 1 kHz but
60 nvHz at 1 Hz.


greg
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?


"GregS"

The noise voltage of many op-amps is almost flat from 1K to 100K, but
below 1 K
it moves upward. I'm looking at the LF353 as it has a very low level of
low frequency
noise, or at least the chart shows that. The AD711 has 18 nvHz at 1 kHz
but
60 nvHz at 1 Hz.



** What a complete ******.



........ Phil





  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Tom MacIntyre
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

On Mon, 01 May 2006 20:38:58 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise !!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF dominate
because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because our ears are more
sensitive to it).


Ears are most sensitive around 1k, aren't they?

Tom


  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Lostgallifreyan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

Tom MacIntyre wrote in
:

On Mon, 01 May 2006 20:38:58 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise
!!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF
dominate because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because our
ears are more sensitive to it).


Ears are most sensitive around 1k, aren't they?

Tom


Probably. I wasn't thinking hard about that, I was just caught by the
claim that HF dominates white noise in the audio band, when white noise is
defined as being made up of all frequencies present with equal energy in
each.
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Tom MacIntyre
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

On Mon, 01 May 2006 21:51:05 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

Tom MacIntyre wrote in
:

On Mon, 01 May 2006 20:38:58 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise
!!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF
dominate because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because our
ears are more sensitive to it).


Ears are most sensitive around 1k, aren't they?

Tom


Probably. I wasn't thinking hard about that, I was just caught by the
claim that HF dominates white noise in the audio band, when white noise is
defined as being made up of all frequencies present with equal energy in
each.


Hmmm...equal energy means that it would be more energy per octave at
higher frequencies, right?

Tom
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Lostgallifreyan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

Tom MacIntyre wrote in
:

On Mon, 01 May 2006 21:51:05 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

Tom MacIntyre wrote in
m:

On Mon, 01 May 2006 20:38:58 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency
noise !!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF
dominate because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because
our ears are more sensitive to it).

Ears are most sensitive around 1k, aren't they?

Tom


Probably. I wasn't thinking hard about that, I was just caught by
the claim that HF dominates white noise in the audio band, when white
noise is defined as being made up of all frequencies present with
equal energy in each.


Hmmm...equal energy means that it would be more energy per octave at
higher frequencies, right?

Tom


Yes, but that comes down to how you define the scale. The only reason,
following from that, to say that HF dominates in the audio band, is because
of expressing a log scale as lin, as pitch as opposed to frequency. If you
say that the pitch notation is purely based on musical needs, and prefer
the frequency scale for electronics analysis, surely you also have to
discard with it the notion of HF dominance.

The reason the claim that HF dominates seems wrong to me, is I think a
peice of string is its own length, regardless of whether we measue in
inches or centimetres, let alone a nonlinear scale. White noise has a very
specific definition, in which energy is equal across the spectrum, does not
dominate part of it. It's out perception of pitch that does that.


  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Tom MacIntyre
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

On Mon, 01 May 2006 22:46:14 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

Tom MacIntyre wrote in
:

On Mon, 01 May 2006 21:51:05 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

Tom MacIntyre wrote in
:

On Mon, 01 May 2006 20:38:58 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency
noise !!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF
dominate because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because
our ears are more sensitive to it).

Ears are most sensitive around 1k, aren't they?

Tom


Probably. I wasn't thinking hard about that, I was just caught by
the claim that HF dominates white noise in the audio band, when white
noise is defined as being made up of all frequencies present with
equal energy in each.


Hmmm...equal energy means that it would be more energy per octave at
higher frequencies, right?

Tom


Yes, but that comes down to how you define the scale. The only reason,
following from that, to say that HF dominates in the audio band, is because
of expressing a log scale as lin, as pitch as opposed to frequency. If you
say that the pitch notation is purely based on musical needs, and prefer
the frequency scale for electronics analysis, surely you also have to
discard with it the notion of HF dominance.

The reason the claim that HF dominates seems wrong to me, is I think a
peice of string is its own length, regardless of whether we measue in
inches or centimetres, let alone a nonlinear scale. White noise has a very
specific definition, in which energy is equal across the spectrum, does not
dominate part of it. It's out perception of pitch that does that.


Interesting about the string, because we can simulate musical octaves
by folding a piece of string in half again and again.

Wouldn't a scale from, say, 100 Hz to 1600 Hz sound "interesting" if
we used 100 Hz as the semitone, rather than 2^(1/12) x f? :-)

Tom
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?


"Lostgallifreyan"

The reason the claim that HF dominates seems wrong to me, is I think a
peice of string is its own length, regardless of whether we measue in
inches or centimetres, let alone a nonlinear scale. White noise has a very
specific definition, in which energy is equal across the spectrum, does
not
dominate part of it. It's out perception of pitch that does that.



** Absolute CRAP.

Go away - half wit.



........... Phil






  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?


"Lostgallifreyan"

Probably. I wasn't thinking hard about that, I was just caught by the
claim that HF dominates white noise in the audio band, when white noise is
defined as being made up of all frequencies present with equal energy in
each.



** WRONG.

Pink noise has equal energy in each octave band or fraction thereof.

However, white noise has about 30 dB more energy at the high end of the
audio band compared to the low end.




........ Phil


  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Jasen Betts
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

On 2006-05-01, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Tom MacIntyre wrote in
:

Probably. I wasn't thinking hard about that, I was just caught by the
claim that HF dominates white noise in the audio band, when white noise is
defined as being made up of all frequencies present with equal energy in
each.


white noise is evenly distributed by frequency. (per Hz)

But frequency perception is logarythmic,
each octave has twice as many Hz from end to end as the one below it
therefore, with white noise, twice as much energy as the one below it.

Bye.
Jasen
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Lostgallifreyan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

Jasen Betts wrote in
:

On 2006-05-01, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Tom MacIntyre wrote in
:

Probably. I wasn't thinking hard about that, I was just caught by
the claim that HF dominates white noise in the audio band, when white
noise is defined as being made up of all frequencies present with
equal energy in each.


white noise is evenly distributed by frequency. (per Hz)

But frequency perception is logarythmic,
each octave has twice as many Hz from end to end as the one below it
therefore, with white noise, twice as much energy as the one below it.

Bye.
Jasen


Don't tell me, tell those who disagreed with me.
You re-expressed exactly what I've been saying here.
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Arfa Daily
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?


"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
9.130...
"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise !!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF dominate
because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because our ears are
more
sensitive to it).


Aren't all Gallifreyans bar The Doctor now lost, since the Dalek war
eradicated them ?

Arfa


  #15   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Lostgallifreyan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?

"Arfa Daily" wrote in
:


"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
9.130...
"Phil Allison" wrote in
:

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise
!!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies. We hear the HF
dominate because higher frequencies have more energy. (And because
our ears are more
sensitive to it).


Aren't all Gallifreyans bar The Doctor now lost, since the Dalek war
eradicated them ?

Arfa




Precisely. You won't know which one I am. I have a lot of fun with this
name, I can tell you. Besides, time is Strange, too strange for Daleks.


  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is my LT44 transformer suitable for audio (de)coupling?


"Lostgallifreyan"
"Phil Allison"

Audio band white noise is totally dominated by high frequency noise !!


White noise has equal amounts of all frequencies.



** Wrong.

It has equal amounts of noise energy in equal amounts of bandwidth.

So, 50% of the noise energy is in the band from 10 kHz to 20 kHz.

90 % is in the band from 2kHz to 20 kHz.

95 % is in the band from 1 kHz to 20 kHz.

99% is in the band from 200Hz to 20 kHz.

Get it ?



We hear the HF dominate
because higher frequencies have more energy.



** No - because it does utterly dominates the energy spectrum.


........ Phil




Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ping: John Byrnes John Stewart Vacuum Tubes 7 August 1st 14 02:01 AM
S.E.X. amplifier review by Andre Jute from Glass Audio [email protected] Vacuum Tubes 0 May 26th 05 09:24 PM
KISS 117 by Andre Jute Andre Jute Vacuum Tubes 26 December 8th 04 10:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"