Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.basics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 May 2006 08:38:56 +0100, Pooh Bear
wrote: Don Pearce wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:36:00 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Don Pearce wrote: But being a total of approx 13k will have little effect across 150 ohms. True - I was just trying to correct your 1.2k, which while hardly a typo was certainly a slip of the decimal point. No - that's the input impedance of a Neve desk - one of the classic designs. Others too. More modern ones may be higher. One more thing - the Neve mic pre has a pretty poor noise performance. At -128dBu equivalent at the input, that is about 6dB above pure thermal noise. That is 4 or 5 dB more noise than they should be achieving. Please do your sums properly Don before making gaffes like that ! Graham Thank you! I did make a gaffe. The actual figure for the Neve noise figure is about 3dB. That is still unforgivably poor for high end kit - it is in fact no better than my little Behringer. Ten years ago I was designing satellite receivers working up at 12GHz. The noise figure I was working to was 0.3dB. The last audio preamp I made had a noise figure of about 0.5dB, because I was willing to use multiple parallel discrete transistors for the input circuitry. Making it any better than this would have been possible, but unwarranted because unlike the satellite receiver, it wasn't pointing at a cold sky, but a warm microphone. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ping: John Byrnes | Vacuum Tubes | |||
S.E.X. amplifier review by Andre Jute from Glass Audio | Vacuum Tubes | |||
KISS 117 by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes |