soundhaspriority wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
.. .
soundhaspriority wrote:

[snip]
I would have this suggestion to you: Stop seeing RAO as your turf or
whatever it is you may see it as that leads you to think you should (or
could, for that matter) restrict a given persons right to express this or
that opinion, no matter how obnoxious that set of opinions might be to
you. That kind of position is against the whole logic of usenet.


Fella,
I respectfully disagree with you.

How can you? You don't "respect" anyone or anything.

This thread was started by the
person I believe to be Dr. Richard Graham, not me. If usenet can tolerate an
anonymous shill, then it can certainly tolerate me.

I don't believe in surrendering a public resource to bad guys.

Newsflash Crazy Bob: You ARE the "bad guys". You're a pathological
liar, who's libelled innocent people on this group despite the fact
that they don't post here, spread false slander and rumour, deliberate
lying speculation that you pass off as "fact". Such as you stating
above that I am an "anonymous shill", when not only have you shown no
evidence to support that claim, there is more evidence that shows YOU
are the "shill" here.


To me, the issue is not about "tweaks."

No, it's about the ideas behind those "tweaks". Ideas which threaten
the entire IEEE and electronics manufacturing industry, (since they
imply that purchasing new audio equipment through habitual upgrades
every time a manufacturer comes out with a revised product, may not be
necessary). You, unlike me and most here, have financial interests in
the audio industry.

The issue is that I believe this person is trying to cheat the
public, by habituating readers of r.a.o. to an identity that hides his
financial relationship with PWB Electronics. To me, that is a cancer.

Uh-huh. But your opinion means nothing, since you are well established
as being a madman. That, plus the fact that you have NEVER, not ONCE
shown any incontrovertible evidence that proves I have any relationship
with PWB Electronics, or Rega, or Roksan, or any of the manufactuerers
I've mentioned in my messages. Not ONE. Every time I asked you for
proof, you laughed it off and ran away. Care to show proof now, in this
thread, that I am Richard Graham, I have a financial relationship with
PWB and am a paid shill? Didn't think so, liar.

Clearly, YOU are the "cancer" here. You and your evil lies against an
innocent man are a form of cancer.

I would like to evaluate the information you have mentioned, but I would
appreciate a link.

Yeah right. Pretend that you can be "reasoned with", and "convinced"
I'm not Graham if only you are shown "enough evidence". We both know
that you will never say otherwise, since you were never sincere in your
belief that I am Graham. Not after talking with the real Graham on the
phone at 3 am, anyway. That's just what makes you such an evil cancer
on this group, Bob.