George M. Middius wrote:

Goofy quoted Shovels' shilling:

"next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick."

I would like to observe that no comparisons are listed with pictures of
other kinds of animals or other types of medications. How about a
caterpillar paired with a Valium? A ladybug combined with a frozen dollop
of Pepto-Bismol? These alleged "tweaks" are seriously under-researched,
science-wise. I think we should all take a step back and wait for Shovels
to provide some credible credentials for his alleged "research".

Don't call me "Shovels". It's stupid and it's childish of you. I could
call you a lot of things, but I'm not doing that, am I? Do you want to
be taken seriously, or do you just want to be taken seriously as being
a fool? If you want to be something more than an audio dilletante who
prefers spending his life arguing politics than learning things about
the hobby you pretend to have an interest in, then don't observe. Do.
Otherwise, you don't know any more about audio than Kreuger does, and
have no right to be attacking him for his infinite ignorance.

How about a caterpillar with a valium? Try it yourself, instead of
asking questions, or even pretending to. I've never tried it, but I
won't ridicule you if you wish to, as you would me. I will say from my
experience, I think it's not likely to do anything; same with your
stupid Pepto Bismol idea. Both are attempts on your part to invalidate
someone else's intelligence and experience. All they do however, is
prove your lack of intelligence and experience, George.

I will agree with your otherwise facetious statement that the tweaks
are seriously under-researched, science wise, and as is evident from
the flock of RAO sheep, otherwise. But nothing's stopping you, is
there. I've already taken my "step back" and I'm waiting for you or one
of you Flatlanders to try the techniques. If you're not interested in
them, then don't talk about "credible credentials", and pretend you're
interested. You wouldn't understand the foundation of the techniques
even if I explained them to you. You especially, George.

Shovels, you need to chlll.

I would like to observe that no comparisons are listed with pictures of
other kinds of animals or other types of medications. How about a
caterpillar paired with a Valium? A ladybug combined with a frozen dollop
of Pepto-Bismol? These alleged "tweaks" are seriously under-researched,
science-wise. I think we should all take a step back and wait for Shovels
to provide some credible credentials for his alleged "research".

Don't call me "Shovels". It's stupid and it's childish of you. I could
call you a lot of things, but I'm not doing that, am I? Do you want to
be taken seriously, or do you just want to be taken seriously as being
a fool?

I'd rather not be taken seriously at all, thank you, Shovels.

If you want to be something more than an audio dilletante who
prefers spending his life arguing politics than learning things about
the hobby you pretend to have an interest in, then don't observe. Do.
Otherwise, you don't know any more about audio than Kreuger does, and
have no right to be attacking him for his infinite ignorance.

No, sorry, that won't cut it. Everything you post is fair game. If you
don't like me mocking you, you're free to ignore me.

How about a caterpillar with a valium? Try it yourself, instead of
asking questions, or even pretending to. I've never tried it, but I
won't ridicule you if you wish to, as you would me. I will say from my
experience, I think it's not likely to do anything; same with your
stupid Pepto Bismol idea. Both are attempts on your part to invalidate
someone else's intelligence and experience. All they do however, is
prove your lack of intelligence and experience, George.

Uh, right. Hey, a unicorn has a tail, right? Can I use a drawing of a
unicorn? It might be difficult to find a photograph of one in my
dimension.

I will agree with your otherwise facetious statement that the tweaks
are seriously under-researched, science wise, and as is evident from
the flock of RAO sheep, otherwise. But nothing's stopping you, is
there.

Not physically, no. Only my better judgment, and my desire to use my
available time for earning a living or having fun. You're the witch doctor
here, Shovels, and I defer to your leadership.

I've already taken my "step back" and I'm waiting for you or one
of you Flatlanders to try the techniques. If you're not interested in
them, then don't talk about "credible credentials", and pretend you're
interested. You wouldn't understand the foundation of the techniques
even if I explained them to you. You especially, George.

I agree -- I probably would not. Unless you share whatever it is you
smoked before you dreamt them up. Want to share, Shovels?