Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:


Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:


Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Well.............................................. ...
I
I
I
~

In article ,
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:

On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:


Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:50:40 GMT, Jenn
wrote:


Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

Sorry, I will rearrange my brain one more time.

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:

On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:50:40 GMT, Jenn
wrote:


Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

Sorry, I will rearrange my brain one more time.

Are you sure you can reach that far up your arse to get it?

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:

On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:


Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

Didn't mean any disrespect,
was referring to classic SNL bit.
I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
Will try to resist using vintage media references
in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
offend all demographics.

In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:

On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:


Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

Didn't mean any disrespect,
was referring to classic SNL bit.
I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
Will try to resist using vintage media references
in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
offend all demographics.

Just razzin' ya ;-)

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:

On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:


Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

Didn't mean any disrespect,
was referring to classic SNL bit.
I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
Will try to resist using vintage media references
in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
offend all demographics.

Just razzin' ya ;-)

Got me :-)
I'm working with the ASQ next month.
Strings rule.

In article om,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:

On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:


Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

Didn't mean any disrespect,
was referring to classic SNL bit.
I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
Will try to resist using vintage media references
in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
offend all demographics.

Just razzin' ya ;-)

Got me :-)
I'm working with the ASQ next month.
Strings rule.

Cool! What do you do?

said:

Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...

Hmph.....

Didn't mean any disrespect,
was referring to classic SNL bit.
I think they were doing an Arnold parody.

Maybe you meant to say, "Jenn, you ignorant slut!"

wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Whereas you just threaten people with a gun. Somehow, that's better.
But even so, you started attacking me before I ever noticed your teeth
having a death grip on my ankles. And you never let up. Why? Because my
opinions and observations are not aligned with your own, whatever you
are. You made all sorts of ad hominem attacks in your busy days of
trolling me, and then you whine about me doing that to you? Right!
Hypocritical much, westface?

Another interesting piece of hypocrisy to point out in your deeply
flawed persona. You just made the assumption that because some dork
found a picture on the net, then declared it was me, that this claim
must be correct. That's why I call you and your RAO associates
"non-thinkers", or "sheep". You never paused for a moment to ask what
Goofball's proof is that I'm the person in the photo, and whether that
proof was valid. So because you just spoon-feed information that YOU
happen to think is credible, you end up being even more of an ignorant
fool than before you got "educated".

It is to note, because it is exactly how self-professed "objectivists"
on usenet develop their core belief system. While paying lip service to
science, you people have no respect for scientific principles or
values. Instead, everything you know about audio, is everything you
know about me from that photo that Goofball pulled out of his arse. You
don't question what you're told, you just believe what you're told.
That's also why it's pointless to debate someone as stupid as you. If
you don't trust the source, you don't believe it. If you do trust the
source, you believe it blindly. Even if it isn't true.

wrote:
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Whereas you just threaten people with a gun. Somehow, that's better.
But even so, you started attacking me before I ever noticed your teeth
having a death grip on my ankles. And you never let up. Why? Because my
opinions and observations are not aligned with your own, whatever you
are. You made all sorts of ad hominem attacks in your busy days of
trolling me, and then you whine about me doing that to you? Right!
Hypocritical much, westface?

Another interesting piece of hypocrisy to point out in your deeply
flawed persona. You just made the assumption that because some dork
found a picture on the net, then declared it was me, that this claim
must be correct. That's why I call you and your RAO associates
"non-thinkers", or "sheep". You never paused for a moment to ask what
Goofball's proof is that I'm the person in the photo, and whether that
proof was valid. So because you just spoon-feed information that YOU
happen to think is credible, you end up being even more of an ignorant
fool than before you got "educated".

It is to note, because it is exactly how self-professed "objectivists"
on usenet develop their core belief system. While paying lip service to
science, you people have no respect for scientific principles or
values. Instead, everything you know about audio, is everything you
know about me from that photo that Goofball pulled out of his arse. You
don't question what you're told, you just believe what you're told.
That's also why it's pointless to debate someone as stupid as you. If
you don't trust the source, you don't believe it. If you do trust the
source, you believe it blindly. Even if it isn't true.

Since you never validate any of the claims you make,
how can you be so bold as to call the information posted
false? That last post about Goofball_star_dot_etal shows what a
class act you are.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...0f76d26?hl=en&

You still keep touting that gun fallacy about me yet it was you that
brought the firearm into the discussion with me:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...21bac98?hl=en&


Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en


You're the one with the fixation on guns, abusing anyone that
contradicts you. You definitely classed up the level of intellect
in RAO.

I'm not whining, I'm waiting for you to provide that bibliography
of
published works, or for that matter any of the points I've called you
on.
Your full of complaints of being attacked, yet all it would take is an
actual response and provide the basic information requested for those
lines of discussion to end.
With no facts, all we can do is speculate, and then you're upset with
the direction those speculations lead.
Were I actually gullible, I would have taken the first thing you wrote
as
ironclad, uncontestable, dogma.

Since your gender has come into the discussion, the way you yelp,
if you're a guy, you were ****ing out the window and it fell down.
If the level of non thinking is too high in this group, you could just
leave, but I'm going to speculate you're a masochist, and enjoying
that "abuse" and feigned victimization.
The other side of that card would be you're a misogynist or
misandrist.

said:

Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en

That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?

George M. Middius wrote:
said:

Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en

That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?

It was the gun referent I was referring to in the post.
He uses that phrasing frequently, regardless of poster.

I must admit knowing nothing of the Enid Lumley
affair in the 80's.
I ignored SHP's assertions on once again defying the
standard electrical practices, and if his statements are
factual, has created the superconducting sound system
model if all efficiencies have been maintained referenced
to contemporary practices.
The RFI/EMI shielding characteristics of 30ga. Magnet wire
certainly can't be understated.
I can't wait to see the wooden fabricated speaker surround
suspension system, non-metal voice coil windings, and
other innovations he's envisioned.
I'm definitely going to build a mud hut for my listening room
so I have no extemporaneous metallic objects in the space.
There goes the Barco Lounger :-(

wrote:

George M. Middius wrote:
said:

I must admit knowing nothing of the Enid Lumley
affair in the 80's.

Thank you for sharing that revelation with us. That's only one of about
60 billion things you don't know about audio, westface.

I ignored SHP's assertions on once again defying the
standard electrical practices, and if his statements are
factual, has created the superconducting sound system
model if all efficiencies have been maintained referenced
to contemporary practices.

Who said the tweaks have anything to do with "electrical practices" or
"contemporary practices"?
Strawman argument noted. I will continue to ignore your ignorant
presumptions, only because you are a fool, and a deceitful, abusive
troll.

The RFI/EMI shielding characteristics of 30ga. Magnet wire
certainly can't be understated.

Who stated the magnet wire was EMI sheilded? Blatant lie, noted.

I can't wait to see the wooden fabricated speaker surround
suspension system, non-metal voice coil windings, and
other innovations he's envisioned.

Show proof that I envision such things. In absence of proof, you are
admitting that you are a deceitful liar, purposefully mischaracterizing
what people say, after having targeted them as your enemies.

I'm definitely going to build a mud hut for my listening room
so I have no extemporaneous metallic objects in the space.

Don't you ever get tired of me proving what a mindless, loud-mouthed
ignorant twit that you are?:

http://www.dnm.co.uk/about.html

The company's PA3 S model is considered by many in the industry to be
the finest SS amp ever made, note.

There goes the Barco Lounger :-(

Forget about ever acheiving truly natural sound from your system.
You're a Flatlander, condemned to remain in hifi hash hell for the rest
of your ignorant life.

George M. Middius wrote:

said:

Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en

That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?

What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick? Do you ever have an intelligent
opinion to espouse on audio, George? Now's your chance to shine....

In article .com,
wrote:

What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick?

Good Lord! Howard's got a sock-puppet! And a stash of old AS mags...

Stephen

MINe 109 said:

What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick?

Good Lord! Howard's got a sock-puppet! And a stash of old AS mags...

I don't think Shovels is an echo of the Ferstlerian. You remember the
truism about a roomful of monkeys banging away on typewriters? That's what
I think we've got in Shovels. Sooner or later, everything will be
repeated.

Shovels said:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en

That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?

What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick? Do you ever have an intelligent
opinion to espouse on audio, George? Now's your chance to shine....

You misunderstood me, Shovels. I meant that the part about Sillybot's
poseurism was on the money. I should have said, more precisely, that I
have no opinion on the Enid part, but the part about Stupey was cogent.

You can relax now.

wrote:
wrote:
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:


Since you never validate any of the claims you make,
how can you be so bold as to call the information posted
false?

YOU are the one that has _never_ validated a claim you made. I'm still
waiting for you to validate your claims that my tweaks are invalid.

You still keep touting that gun fallacy about me yet it was you that
brought the firearm into the discussion with me:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...21bac98?hl=en&

No, you're deliberately trying to obfuscate, which is a very deceitful
tactic you must have learned from your puppet master, Arny Krueger. In
that post, I referred to the fact that my grandfather's ear was shot
off in the war. That has nothing to do with the fact that you
threatened me at "virtual gunpoint", in another post. This was when you
were losing the audio debate with me, note.

I'm not whining

All you do IS whine, westface. Why do you think no one reads you?

I'm waiting for you to provide that bibliography
of published works, or for that matter any of the points I've called you
on.

Well I'm still waiting for you to provide that tech sheet that shows
you engineered the world's finest amplifier, and any of the other
points I've called you on.

Your full of complaints of being attacked, yet all it would take is an
actual response and provide the basic information requested for those
lines of discussion to end.

You will get that when you provide the basic information requested as
to your evidence that my tweaks are not valid.


With no facts, all we can do is speculate, and then you're upset with
the direction those speculations lead.

Upset? Who's upset? In addition to your other fraudulent claims, are
you claiming to be a mind reader?

Were I actually gullible, I would have taken the first thing you wrote
as ironclad, uncontestable, dogma.

Oh you _are_ gullible, no mistaking that fact. You took the first thing
written about ABX-DBT tests, and everything that followed from that, as
fact.

You are mindless sheep, westface. A Flatlander, believing whatever
you're told to believe. I never posted anything with the intent that
people believe it simply because someone posted it (and certainly not
presented as "dogma". Dogma is not a good thing....).
Being the idiot you are, it never would occur to you to try the tweak.
No, instead you've spent hours upon hours attacking me for posting the
tweaks, but not the 30 seconds it takes to try the tweaks you
ignorantly attack. You don't have to be gullible all your life,
believing in whatever you are spoon fed. But you choose to be ignorant,
and pretend you're not. If you're interested in whether the tweaks work
or don't, you would try them. If you're not, why do you keep stalking
me, and feign interest in discussing them?

Since your gender has come into the discussion, the way you yelp,
if you're a guy, you were ****ing out the window and it fell down.

And you actually have the cheek to whine about me not being "classy",
or about others and their "ad hominem attacks" or "personal character
attacks" with hypocritical tripe like this? And you think people are
supposed to take you seriously?


If the level of non thinking is too high in this group, you could just
leave, but I'm going to speculate you're a masochist, and enjoying
that "abuse" and feigned victimization.

"Abuse"? Hello? You are one dumb, confused little lemming, westface.
You still think after all I posted, that I actually give a tinker's
damn about people who wish to mock, ridicule, deride me, or in your
case threaten me with a gun? That I consider it "abuse"? I've never
heard of "abuse" inspiring gut-wrenching laughter, have you? I'm sorry,
but you're stupider than even I gave you credit for being. You're
giving a motley crew of slack-jawed, mindless trolls far more power and
influence than they actually have. And underestimating me by a country
mile.

The other side of that card would be you're a misogynist or
misandrist.

Close. I'm a philanthropist. Hence the plethora of free tweaks that I
offer the group. Confused? You will be....


I must admit knowing nothing of the Enid Lumley
affair in the 80's.

Thank you for sharing that revelation with us. That's only one of about
60 billion things you don't know about audio, westface.

I ignored SHP's assertions on once again defying the
standard electrical practices, and if his statements are
factual, has created the superconducting sound system
model if all efficiencies have been maintained referenced
to contemporary practices.

Who said the tweaks have anything to do with "electrical practices" or
"contemporary practices"?
Strawman argument noted. I will continue to ignore your ignorant
presumptions, only because you are a fool, and a deceitful, abusive
troll.

The RFI/EMI shielding characteristics of 30ga. Magnet wire
certainly can't be understated.

Who stated the magnet wire was EMI sheilded? Blatant lie, noted.

I can't wait to see the wooden fabricated speaker surround
suspension system, non-metal voice coil windings, and
other innovations he's envisioned.

Show proof that I envision such things. In absence of proof, you are
admitting that you are a deceitful liar, purposefully mischaracterizing
what people say, after having targeted them as your enemies.

I'm definitely going to build a mud hut for my listening room
so I have no extemporaneous metallic objects in the space.

Don't you ever get tired of me proving what a mindless, loud-mouthed
ignorant twit that you are?:

http://www.dnm.co.uk/about.html

The company's PA3 S model is considered by many in the industry to be
the finest SS amp ever made, note.

There goes the Barco Lounger :-(

Forget about ever acheiving truly natural sound from your system.
You're a Flatlander, condemned to remain in hifi hash hell for the rest
of your ignorant life.