Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Geoff Wood" -nospam wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: Here's a news flash Valle - CE/Audition also has wave form synthesis and a spectrum analyzer. So they aren't valid reasons to prefer SF. One could easily prefer SF's versions, so it ain't a reason to prefer CE/A either. Agreed. While both products have these features, significant details of their implementations might vary. For example, in former discussions there were some ease-of-use differences in the implementation of normalization that favored WL for less-experienced users. We don't all have to fawn over the same application. Agreed. However, it's not always all about fawning. It's also about having a job to do and whether a product has the necessary features. I sort of stumbled into CE some years ago, and just it kept meeting my needs. CE was an early implementer of 24 & 32 bits, and still offers unsurpassed support for far higher sample rates. I believe that SF 5, which followed CEP by a year or more, was the first SF to support 24/96. I have briefly used a lite verison of SF, but really didn't see enough of a difference to justify switching. There appears to have been a period of a year or more when CE supported far more data formats and higher sample rates than SF. OTOH, SF has long appeared to have an integrated CD burning feature that Adobe has not yet made available in Audition, after a promising beta release from Syntrillium in CE2. I believe that possibly Wavelab has the edge on SF in functionality. Wavelab appears to have be RAM-based while SF & CE/Audition are disk-based. This gives WL a speed advantage for small files. Regrettably it appears that WL is merely a stereo product, and you have to look elsewhere in the Steinberg line for multitracking. Looking at Steinberg's line of products, it seems that it would take Cubase + Nuendo + Wavelab to compare to Audition. But I prefer SF's user interface and way of working. During my brief experience with SF, I was struck by how similar the programs were for the features that both implemented. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why do the speakers sound so bad? | Car Audio | |||
SPAM New software for vehicles: MyRide | Car Audio | |||
Amps, more argument! | Car Audio | |||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC | General | |||
Audio amplifier design trivial? | Audio Opinions |