Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
 
Posts: n/a
Default nob, here's some historical deficit info for you...

nob, you keep arguing both sides. I pointed out some time ago how
Clinton sought compromise in Supreme Court nominees by seeking the
cousel of Orrin Hatch. You dismissed that out-of-hand.

No matter what you think about the other Bush or Reagan, they were willing
to work with the other side and try to give the country what it needed and
somnetimes what it wanted even if it wasn't the right thing to want.


I presume that you're referring to Bush I. Do you see any difference
with how Bush II handles working with the other side?

Nice to see you don't like to keep things in context and that you still
don't get it that I'm not a rubber stamp for Bush or the GOP.


But you are, based on what you say.

So you're arguing that roving wiretaps are OK because apparently
Clinton tried to do it, or are you arguing that the hot water bushie is
in is Clainton's fault?

My defense of Bush is limited to things I think he gets unfair treatment on.
I also like to see a bit of context. The reality seems to be that since
Bush took office he's been opposed at almost every turn for everything, with
the apparent goal to keep him from getting absolutely anything done. A few
exceptions to be sure, but overall complete opposition.


No, his opposition is that many, many people disagree with the track
bushie and crew are taking us down, and their representatives are doing
their jobs opposing it. Otherwise, why are even republicans beginning
to distance themselves from him and his policies?

I remember when the Dems were in the majority. Gingrich, et al, called
themselves the 'loyal opposition.' Now the opposition is considered
treasonous or obstructionist.

Bull****.

Apparently you would not have a problem with having a monarchy.

  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Clyde Slick
 
Posts: n/a
Default nob, here's some historical deficit info for you...


"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
\

Apparently you would not have a problem with having a monarchy.


Queen Jenna?



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CD-Text Info Important to Radio Stations? Jay Roberts Pro Audio 15 August 17th 05 11:17 PM
Is all audio literature shallow? Where is the IN-DEPTH info? Ignace Dhont Pro Audio 24 March 7th 04 02:17 PM
Wanted: INFO, SCHEMATIC OR 10" WOOFERS for JENSEN TF-3 SPEAKERS unc80 Marketplace 0 March 5th 04 12:28 AM
Where are those Wascally Weapons of Mass Destwuction??? Jacob Kramer Audio Opinions 1094 September 9th 03 02:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"