Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All--
Just wondering if anybody has some good advice for dealing with a compressed sounding guitar in the background of a vocal track. This was the first time I tried recording someone who refused to do overdubs. I miked the guitar with a hypercardiod condenser (rode s1) and compressed the vocal track going in. It was a mistake I realize now, but I'd like to know the best way to work with the tracks I have...this was a one-time deal. Thanks, Paul |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Kotheimer wrote:
Just wondering if anybody has some good advice for dealing with a compressed sounding guitar in the background of a vocal track. This was the first time I tried recording someone who refused to do overdubs. I miked the guitar with a hypercardiod condenser (rode s1) and compressed the vocal track going in. It was a mistake I realize now, but I'd like to know the best way to work with the tracks I have...this was a one-time deal. Thanks, Well, if you bring both tracks up... how does it sound? Leakage is only a problem if it sounds bad. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leakage is only a problem if it sounds bad
Excellent point! I've successfully recorded and mixed many guitar/vocals, or piano/vocals. It never sounds bad (unless the artist sucks). Some of my favorite recordings by singers like Frank Sinatra, The Beatles, Joni Mitchell, Nora Jones, Sarah McGlaughlin, Nirvana, Johnny Cash, and NWA/Dr. Dre have elements of leakage that do not detract in any way from the great sound of the final mix. -- Regards, Ted Perlman Producer-Arranger-Composer-Guitarist www.tedperlman.com |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
... Paul Kotheimer wrote: Just wondering if anybody has some good advice for dealing with a compressed sounding guitar in the background of a vocal track. This was the first time I tried recording someone who refused to do overdubs. I miked the guitar with a hypercardiod condenser (rode s1) and compressed the vocal track going in. It was a mistake I realize now, but I'd like to know the best way to work with the tracks I have...this was a one-time deal. Thanks, Well, if you bring both tracks up... how does it sound? Leakage is only a problem if it sounds bad. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." Sounds really good actually. I don't even know if I really hear the compression in the final mix or if it's just in my head. The clients said they thought it sounded great when I played back what I tracked to them...so maybe you're right Scott (as usual). Paul |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Kotheimer wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message Paul Kotheimer wrote: Just wondering if anybody has some good advice for dealing with a compressed sounding guitar in the background of a vocal track. This was the first time I tried recording someone who refused to do overdubs. I miked the guitar with a hypercardiod condenser (rode s1) and compressed the vocal track going in. It was a mistake I realize now, but I'd like to know the best way to work with the tracks I have...this was a one-time deal. Thanks, Well, if you bring both tracks up... how does it sound? Leakage is only a problem if it sounds bad. Sounds really good actually. I don't even know if I really hear the compression in the final mix or if it's just in my head. The clients said they thought it sounded great when I played back what I tracked to them...so maybe you're right Scott (as usual). If the client likes it, it's good. You can also try fiddling around with delay if the leakage has caused comb filtering in the guitar. But again, if it's not a problem, don't worry about it. Next time track without compression. These days we have plenty of dynamic range and there's no reason to compress on tracking. Also try using mikes with better rejection. I think getting good rejection on the guitar is more important than on the vocal because a little comb filtering on the guitar isn't as bad as a little comb filtering on the vocal. If you have figure-8 mikes, this is the time to use them. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/30/06 1:43 PM, in article ,
"Paul Kotheimer" wrote: Well, if you bring both tracks up... how does it sound? Leakage is only a problem if it sounds bad. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." Sounds really good actually. I don't even know if I really hear the compression in the final mix or if it's just in my head. The clients said they thought it sounded great when I played back what I tracked to them...so maybe you're right Scott (as usual). Wait! wait! You WON! Nobody complained? DEAL! Now.. For curiosity's sake, as a technical experiment (which is how I'm a-readin' yer re-quest) I'll assume that you have a clean and little-to-no-vocal GUITAR track recorded at the same time as the vocal track... In that case you can try playing with mixing some of the dry guitar into the vocal track in as-exact-a-reverse-polarity (I Hereby Refuse To Get Sucked Into Another Pointless Polarity-vs-Phase Creationism Fight) manner as you can manage. This means you need to - get the guitar track to match TIME as closely as possible to the vocal-mic-guitar leak (unless you;re real lucky and your voc-mic-to-guitar distance actually matched your guitar-mic-to-guitar distance) and then decide which polarity -cancels- the guitar sound... You may want to try some odd eq on the guitar track to make it sound more like the leak into the vocal mic for a better cancellation You may want to try matching the compression on the vocal track so the guitar cancellation matches the dynamic futzing... This is really annoying to wrestle into shape, especially when there's some VOCAL leak on the GUITAR track that then starts interfereing with the clean vocal track... TANSTAAFL -always- holds true. but when you get it.. It's really fun... Look Ma! No Leak! |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ted Perlman wrote: .... and NWA/Dr. Dre have elements of leakage that do not detract in any way from the great sound of the final mix. woah. I was with you up until this point. What kind of pleasant leakage are you referring to with NWA/Dre? Blasting headphone mix getting into the vocal mic? Just curious. Dan Fox |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What kind of pleasant leakage are you referring to with NWA/Dre? Blasting
headphone mix getting into the vocal mic Sometimes. I just finished working on 4 tracks with Burt Bacharach & Dr. Dre on Burt's new Grammy-nominated CD "At This Time" (Columbia). I got to listen to Dre's loops and beats solo, and they sounded great. Not pristine clean, but great. Sometimes there was some HH on the snare, sometimes some HH on the kick, etc. Didn't matter. Listen to some of the early Beatles stereo mixes. You can hear the headphone bleed before John comes in singing, etc. I'm not a huge fan of too much leakage, but it seems that whenever I get anal and start taking out too much leakage and room noise, the "ambience" and "space" of the recording starts to disappear. I really notice it at mix time. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Guitar and panning | Pro Audio | |||
Help with home recording classical guitar! | Pro Audio | |||
Which acoustic guitar pickup do buy? | Pro Audio | |||
Question: Vocal micing of acoustic instrument | Pro Audio | |||
Small Condenser reccomendations for acoustic guitar | Pro Audio |