Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi ... I'd greatly appreciate any input you might have..
I'm running a DAW with Neve/Amek preamp, looking for a 'nice' mic for primarily vocal use (in an iso booth of course). I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Ideally I want something that will sound 'present' in the mix, whereby whispering levels sound like it's straight in your ear, and normal to screaming levels are pretty much right without much EQing. Thoughts? Cross-comparisons? Opinions? Alternatives? Thanks! |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also look at SE mics
http://www.seelectronics.com/ "Zooper" wrote in message ... Hi ... I'd greatly appreciate any input you might have.. I'm running a DAW with Neve/Amek preamp, looking for a 'nice' mic for primarily vocal use (in an iso booth of course). I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Ideally I want something that will sound 'present' in the mix, whereby whispering levels sound like it's straight in your ear, and normal to screaming levels are pretty much right without much EQing. Thoughts? Cross-comparisons? Opinions? Alternatives? Thanks! |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:49:04 -0500, Don Nafe wrote
(in article ): Also look at SE mics http://www.seelectronics.com/ "Zooper" wrote in message ... Hi ... I'd greatly appreciate any input you might have.. I'm running a DAW with Neve/Amek preamp, looking for a 'nice' mic for primarily vocal use (in an iso booth of course). I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Ideally I want something that will sound 'present' in the mix, whereby whispering levels sound like it's straight in your ear, and normal to screaming levels are pretty much right without much EQing. Thoughts? Cross-comparisons? Opinions? Alternatives? Thanks! Don't bother with SE. Go right to the 4060. Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Zooper" wrote in message ... Hi ... I'd greatly appreciate any input you might have.. I'm running a DAW with Neve/Amek preamp, looking for a 'nice' mic for primarily vocal use (in an iso booth of course). I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Define "warmth". Ideally I want something that will sound 'present' in the mix, whereby whispering levels sound like it's straight in your ear, and normal to screaming levels are pretty much right without much EQing. Warmth & presence - the holy grail. You might have to revise your somewhat contradicting expectations and roll up your sleeves. Getting it to sound right often involves more than just sticking a microphone in front of a vocalist, especially if it's the single microphone used for different vocalists and styles. If you don't have a choice of mics and preamps - you've mentioned screaming so I'd add compressors to the list of tools - you might find it crucial to experiment extensively with the mic placement. Closer or further, from above or below, sideways.... pointing not only at the mouth, but nose, chest and elsewhere... all different sounds, different ratios of warmth and presence. Thoughts? Cross-comparisons? Opinions? Alternatives? Try a transformer-based mic preamp for "warmth" before you spend any money on a tube microphone. Predrag |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Zooper wrote: Hi ... I'd greatly appreciate any input you might have.. I'm running a DAW with Neve/Amek preamp, looking for a 'nice' mic for primarily vocal use (in an iso booth of course). I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Ideally I want something that will sound 'present' in the mix, whereby whispering levels sound like it's straight in your ear, and normal to screaming levels are pretty much right without much EQing. EV RE-27. Much more forward sounding (due to the presence peak) than the RE-20. Sounds good off-mike, which makes it handy for people with a lot of dynamic range that tend to back off on loud passages. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ty Ford" wrote in message ... Don't bother with SE. Go right to the 4060. Ty Ford I love the 4060, but it's a difficult microphone to sell to people who believe in existence of so called tube sound. The fact that its price in the U.S. is just over a half of what it costs in Europe only adds to the confusion. Predrag |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Nafe wrote:
Also look at SE mics Look at 'em if you must, but don't buy one. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Predrag Trpkov wrote:
Define "warmth". Thermal energy. AKA "heat". The stuff that comes off of the filaments of a vacuum tube. Sure, there's other ways to get it. But it's hard to find a gas stove with phantom power. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agent 86 wrote:
Predrag Trpkov wrote: Define "warmth". Thermal energy. AKA "heat". The stuff that comes off of the filaments of a vacuum tube. Sure, there's other ways to get it. But it's hard to find a gas stove with phantom power. My B&K mikes have 5W resistors in them that you can power remotely to keep condensation down in humid weather. They are very warm, sometimes bloody hot, even. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everyone...
Well I'm leaning towards the AT4060 now.. but a bit concerned about it's self-noise, which seems worse than the Rode K2. Anyone experience excessive noise with the 4060? Also a question on prices... I'm wondering why this mic is so much cheaper than everywhere else, including Japan where it's made!!!! Like significantly cheaper.. basically half. cheers "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... In article , Zooper wrote: Hi ... I'd greatly appreciate any input you might have.. I'm running a DAW with Neve/Amek preamp, looking for a 'nice' mic for primarily vocal use (in an iso booth of course). I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Ideally I want something that will sound 'present' in the mix, whereby whispering levels sound like it's straight in your ear, and normal to screaming levels are pretty much right without much EQing. EV RE-27. Much more forward sounding (due to the presence peak) than the RE-20. Sounds good off-mike, which makes it handy for people with a lot of dynamic range that tend to back off on loud passages. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I meant to say.. significantly cheaper in the United States than everywhere
else! "Zooper" wrote in message ... Thanks everyone... Well I'm leaning towards the AT4060 now.. but a bit concerned about it's self-noise, which seems worse than the Rode K2. Anyone experience excessive noise with the 4060? Also a question on prices... I'm wondering why this mic is so much cheaper than everywhere else, including Japan where it's made!!!! Like significantly cheaper.. basically half. cheers "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... In article , Zooper wrote: Hi ... I'd greatly appreciate any input you might have.. I'm running a DAW with Neve/Amek preamp, looking for a 'nice' mic for primarily vocal use (in an iso booth of course). I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Ideally I want something that will sound 'present' in the mix, whereby whispering levels sound like it's straight in your ear, and normal to screaming levels are pretty much right without much EQing. EV RE-27. Much more forward sounding (due to the presence peak) than the RE-20. Sounds good off-mike, which makes it handy for people with a lot of dynamic range that tend to back off on loud passages. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:42:38 -0500, Zooper wrote
(in article ): Thanks everyone... Well I'm leaning towards the AT4060 now.. but a bit concerned about it's self-noise, which seems worse than the Rode K2. Anyone experience excessive noise with the 4060? Also a question on prices... I'm wondering why this mic is so much cheaper than everywhere else, including Japan where it's made!!!! Like significantly cheaper.. basically half. cheers I reviewed it a while back check the online archives on my site from mic reviews. Regards, Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Zooper wrote: I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux, so the AT4060 or Rode K2 *seem* like viable options/alternatives. Any further suggestions would be great! I've specified valve mics here as I'd like a bit of 'warmth' to complement my solid state signal chain/DAW.. and modern valve mics seem pretty easy on the noise levels. Just having a tube in your mic (or preamp or soudn card) doesn't by itself make anything warm except perhaps your fingers if you touch it. Nor does buying a Neumann or Soundelux necessarily assure that you'll get the sound that you want. You just have to try these things with your sources and your kind of music and pick what works best for you. Buy something, try it, and if you like what it does, keep it. If you don't like it, return it and try something else. Most dealers will work with you on finding the sound you're lookiing for. Both the AT 4060 and the Rode K2 have their fans, and for good reason. Will you be one? You'll neer know until you try. Make friends with a dealer, even if it's a mail-order dealer. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm hesitant to shell out excessive cash on a Neumann or Soundelux,
Well, it's only excessive if you feel the sound result is not worth the price. Nobody can decide the cost/value issue for you, but consider the fact that EVERY major studio in the world has a significant investment in Neumann mics. Also, consider that there are a number of microphones which do not contain a valve which will give you what you would most likely define as "warmth" & "presence" just as there are many mics which do contain a valve which will not. Scott Fraser |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Zooper" wrote in message ... Thanks everyone... Well I'm leaning towards the AT4060 now.. but a bit concerned about it's self-noise, which seems worse than the Rode K2. Specs are often deceiving. I can't imagine it being a problem for you. I'm remixing some stuff I recorded several years ago, while I was using the original version of Rode Classic for main vocals. It was a noise generator compared to the AT 4060, or Rode Classic II for that matter, and yet nothing is bothering me at all. Not even during a capella passages. Anyone experience excessive noise with the 4060? Also a question on prices... I'm wondering why this mic is so much cheaper than everywhere else, including Japan where it's made!!!! Like significantly cheaper.. basically half. Enjoy it while you can. Predrag |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the Røde NTK (which supposedly became multipatterned and renamed K2)
and I have used the 4060 on numerous occasions. The fact is they are both great and I would find it hard to choose between them. Like I said, I only know the NTK so this may not go for the K2 but it seems to have a slight boost in the high mid which makes it very easy to use on almost any vocal. Anyway I would buy the cheapest of the two because in my mind they both have equal strenths. For the SE thing, I tested the early 5500 which sounded great for speech and soft vocals but distorted when pressured so it was not for me and it did seem a bit fragile. It does seem that they have improved a lot since then though because tests of the one called Gemini have been unusually positive so I doubt that all the negative posts concerning these mics is based on experience, not with their new line anyway. I recently borrowed a Neumann 147 and it sounded great, and better than my NTK. The question is, did it sound a lot better, enough to justify the price-difference. To me, maybe but if it wasn't because my clients sometimes ask for a Neumann, I would be more than happy just to use the NTK and on most occasions it simply wouldn't matter because they both sound very very good. One sounds a tad better than the other but it costs 3-4 times as much. PS remember that many rock'n roll singers use a SM57 for vocals because it just sounds right. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You've left off your website in your sig of late, Ty. It might be helpful
if you tell them where you're excellent reviews are. -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio http://blogs.salon.com/0004478/ "Is our children learning?" President George W. Bush "Ty Ford" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:42:38 -0500, Zooper wrote (in article ): Thanks everyone... Well I'm leaning towards the AT4060 now.. but a bit concerned about it's self-noise, which seems worse than the Rode K2. Anyone experience excessive noise with the 4060? Also a question on prices... I'm wondering why this mic is so much cheaper than everywhere else, including Japan where it's made!!!! Like significantly cheaper.. basically half. cheers I reviewed it a while back check the online archives on my site from mic reviews. Regards, Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SE: Good recommendation - I bought two SE Z5600 Valve mics as soon as I
plugged them in. I won't do another record without them. They are my go to male vocal mics..consistant beat my Neumann U87ai... Rode has never done it for me-I have had almost everything they make. The AT 4060 is a super mic. Mark Mark "HKC" wrote in message . .. I have the Røde NTK (which supposedly became multipatterned and renamed K2) and I have used the 4060 on numerous occasions. The fact is they are both great and I would find it hard to choose between them. Like I said, I only know the NTK so this may not go for the K2 but it seems to have a slight boost in the high mid which makes it very easy to use on almost any vocal. Anyway I would buy the cheapest of the two because in my mind they both have equal strenths. For the SE thing, I tested the early 5500 which sounded great for speech and soft vocals but distorted when pressured so it was not for me and it did seem a bit fragile. It does seem that they have improved a lot since then though because tests of the one called Gemini have been unusually positive so I doubt that all the negative posts concerning these mics is based on experience, not with their new line anyway. I recently borrowed a Neumann 147 and it sounded great, and better than my NTK. The question is, did it sound a lot better, enough to justify the price-difference. To me, maybe but if it wasn't because my clients sometimes ask for a Neumann, I would be more than happy just to use the NTK and on most occasions it simply wouldn't matter because they both sound very very good. One sounds a tad better than the other but it costs 3-4 times as much. PS remember that many rock'n roll singers use a SM57 for vocals because it just sounds right. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's amazing what you can find when you look. | Audio Opinions | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio |