Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I could use some advice.
I am a semi-audiophile with a decent stereo system that is getting long in the tooth. I am considering going digital, i.e., ripping my CDs to either a PC-based or an integrated stand alone "music manager". I would be interested in opinions on the following. If I went PC-based: -can one get a sireless remote whcih can control things from another room? --is there good and easy to use software for managing files and creating playlists? - will a good sound card have the same audio quality as a good stand alone CD player? If I went stand -alone (a la Escient): -what do you get for your $4000? I'm not opposed to this approach, but I can't tell what advantages there are over just going with a PC solution. All opinions gratefully accepted. Thanks, Bill |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill" wrote in message ups.com... I could use some advice. I am a semi-audiophile with a decent stereo system that is getting long in the tooth. I am considering going digital, i.e., ripping my CDs to either a PC-based or an integrated stand alone "music manager". I would be interested in opinions on the following. In which case you are nowhere near an audiphile. If I went PC-based: -can one get a sireless remote whcih can control things from another room? Not sure, but I suspect yes. --is there good and easy to use software for managing files and creating playlists? Yes, lots. MusicMatch Jukebox is a popular one. - will a good sound card have the same audio quality as a good stand alone CD player? A quality soundcard may have an equivalent performance, but the ripped music won't. If I went stand -alone (a la Escient): -what do you get for your $4000? I'm not opposed to this approach, but I can't tell what advantages there are over just going with a PC solution. All opinions gratefully accepted. Call me a luddite if you like, but I prefer the approaqch of selecting a CD I want o hear, and plugging it into my CD player. Straightforward, focussed, and uncomplicated. geoff |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff@work wrote:
"Bill" wrote in message ups.com... I could use some advice. I am a semi-audiophile with a decent stereo system that is getting long in the tooth. I am considering going digital, i.e., ripping my CDs to either a PC-based or an integrated stand alone "music manager". I would be interested in opinions on the following. In which case you are nowhere near an audiphile. Ah, yes. Computers are the tool of the devil and lo-fi reproduction. If I went PC-based: -can one get a sireless remote whcih can control things from another room? Not sure, but I suspect yes. --is there good and easy to use software for managing files and creating playlists? Yes, lots. MusicMatch Jukebox is a popular one. - will a good sound card have the same audio quality as a good stand alone CD player? A quality soundcard may have an equivalent performance, but the ripped music won't. That's just silly, without some context. If he rips to FLAC or even uncompressed WAV format, then the only difference before the sound card is likely due to flaws in the reading of the CD, in the standalone player. The fact has been established repeatedly on this newsgroup that ripping a CD to computer is an excellent way of recovering from flaws or damage in the original material. It's only when it gets encoded to a LOSSY format (mp3 - yuck!) that it fails to be as good as or better than the original CD. As for the sound card issue, I'll leave that for others to discuss. Colin |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Colin B." wrote in message ... Geoff@work wrote: "Bill" wrote in message ups.com... I could use some advice. I am a semi-audiophile with a decent stereo system that is getting long in the tooth. I am considering going digital, i.e., ripping my CDs to either a PC-based or an integrated stand alone "music manager". I would be interested in opinions on the following. In which case you are nowhere near an audiphile. Ah, yes. Computers are the tool of the devil and lo-fi reproduction. No, but mp3, wma, and cronies are. That's just silly, without some context. If he rips to FLAC or even uncompressed WAV format, then the only difference before the sound card is likely due to flaws in the reading of the CD, in the standalone player. And what do you think the chances of that being the scenario are ? The common conception is that higher rate lossy encoding (if the user differentiates between rates at all) is 'CD Quality'. It's only when it gets encoded to a LOSSY format (mp3 - yuck!) that it fails to be as good as or better than the original CD. I don't have a problem with that reasoning. Just that ain't the way close to 100% of people persuing this route of musical satisfaction think. geoff |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well, Geoff, I apologize for intruding.
I thought this was a newsgroup. So sorry. Bill |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill" wrote in message ups.com... I am a semi-audiophile with a decent stereo system that is getting long in the tooth. I am considering going digital, i.e., ripping my CDs to either a PC-based or an integrated stand alone "music manager". I would be interested in opinions on the following. If I went PC-based: -can one get a wireless remote whcih can control things from another room? Example: http://www.compuvisor.com/logcomremcon.html --is there good and easy to use software for managing files and creating playlists? Many options such as Musicmatch. - will a good sound card have the same audio quality as a good stand alone CD player? Many options including the M-Audio Audiophile 24/96. If I went stand -alone (a la Escient): -what do you get for your $4000? I'm not opposed to this approach, but I can't tell what advantages there are over just going with a PC solution. No personal experience, sorry. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill" wrote in message oups.com... well, Geoff, I apologize for intruding. I thought this was a newsgroup. So sorry. Bill Que ? Sorry if the info I've offered clashes with some preciously-held belief of yours. Presumably you were after opinions on the pro's and con's of using 'digital music managers' and wanted opinions. That is my opinion, you may ignore it or take from it whatever you like. geoff |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Geoff@work" wrote:
Ah, yes. Computers are the tool of the devil and lo-fi reproduction. No, but mp3, wma, and cronies are. He didnšt say he would mp3 or wma it, aping would not be a problem ... nor waving. geoff Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio |