Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Ruud Broens
 
Posts: n/a
Default DBT in audio - a protocol


"ScottW" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
: "ScottW" wrote in message
: news:Y0izf.34836$0G.30466@dukeread10...
: :
: : "Don Pearce" wrote in message
: : ...
: : On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:29:56 GMT, wrote:
: :
: : As for HD - it is going to be worse. No broadcaster is going to spend
: : the kind of bandwidth necessary for high quality transmission of HD.
: : There may be areas of screen with nice fine detail, but the rest will
: : be a disgusting mess of MPEG artifacts - much worse than today on
: : standard definition. Forget what you have seen so far on the demos -
: : that doesn't reflect future reality.
: :
: : d
: : I hate to disagree with you, but the first time I saw an HD picture it
was
: : on a rear projection TV that was tuned to a channel broadcasting an HD
: : picture, not a demo. I was immediately aware of the improved quality of
: : the
: : picture and more impressed because of the fact that it was rear
: : projection.
: :
: : One of my friends moved recently and has a TV that he bought 3 years ago
: : that was HD capable but he'd enver had it hooked up to a HD signal. Now
: : that he has, he tells me he almost hates to go out because of the
: : improvement. It's like watching everything for the first time.
: :
: :
: :
: :
: : Don't worry, you aren't disagreeing with me. HD is brilliant - it is
: : the future of HD that is going to be full of disappointment as more
: : and more channels want to get in on the act.
: :
: : Not a problem.... the phone companies are gonna leapfrog the cable
: : companies with FttP (fiber to the premise) and bring megabandwidth to the
: : problem.
: :
: : Hows a 20 fold increase in bandwidth over cable sound?
: :
: : http://www22.verizon.com/about/commu...echnology.html
: :
: : Rollouts are in progress in virtually every major metro area in the
country.
: :
: : ScottW
: :
: actually, it says:
: "
: a.. Fiber technology provides nearly unlimited bandwidth,
: a.. as much as 20 times faster than today's fastest
: a.. high-speed data connections."
:
: which is pretty nondescriptive.
: around here, that'd be 400 Mbs, not bad, but rather underutilizing
: fiber capacity.
:
: Gross underestimation of cable bandwidth noted. They don't like
: publicize but you seem to be assuming that all of cables BW is used for
: internet... I'm guessing its only a fraction.

repeated reading error noted. it says "high speed data connections", that
has nothing to do with the cable bandwidth. *that* would be, depending
on length and quality, up to several Gbs for cable. you're confusing total
capacity with the fraction that is currently reserved for _data connections_.
:
: For example... if 1080i HD requires 20 to 30 Mbs (I don't know the
: number so I've no reason to doubt you).... then cable is bringing about
: 400 Mbs into my home for HD alone today... I have no idea what the
: total BW cable offers but if your number is correct... it has to be
: around 2gig or so.

that is what is broadcasted, not a data connection over cable.
:
:
: 4 Mbs satellite up/downstreams i've seen are pretty
: good for normal quality tv channels, HD done the right way is some
: 20 to 30 Mbs, so no way you can have many HD channels on a 400 Mbs
: capacity link
:
: some problems with ftth rollout:
:
: world fiber production capacity being where it is, just to facilitate the US
: alone would take decades of production
:
: I am not aware of any fiber shortage... lets see a reference. Last I
: looked.. Dow was having a problem keep fiber prices where they wanted
: them.

sorry, what *you*'re not aware of doesn't set any standard. as Ferstler would
say: trust me, i know of what i speak :-)
Rudy

:
:
: the associated cost is not equipment, nor fiber cost, it's the digging that
: is extremely costly - it'll have to be paid for in some way to make ftth
viable
:
: Sure.. many cable companies went bankrupt after deployment... they
: couldn't recover the cost of network rollout. Every satellite phone
: offering did the same thing. I wouldn't be surprised if the phone
: companies don't suffer in this project. But they have no choice. The
: silly little twisted pair is going to leave them with no product anyone
: wants and no customers. Plus they don't have to share fiber like
: copper networks. Its they only way they can fight back against the
: cable companies. If they don't.. they're doomed.
:
: ScottW



 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's amazing what you can find when you look. Audio Opinions 76 December 3rd 05 06:33 AM
Artists cut out the record biz [email protected] Pro Audio 64 July 9th 04 10:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"