Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ScottW" wrote in message oups.com... : : Ruud Broens wrote: : "ScottW" wrote in message : news:Y0izf.34836$0G.30466@dukeread10... : : : : "Don Pearce" wrote in message : : ... : : On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:29:56 GMT, wrote: : : : : As for HD - it is going to be worse. No broadcaster is going to spend : : the kind of bandwidth necessary for high quality transmission of HD. : : There may be areas of screen with nice fine detail, but the rest will : : be a disgusting mess of MPEG artifacts - much worse than today on : : standard definition. Forget what you have seen so far on the demos - : : that doesn't reflect future reality. : : : : d : : I hate to disagree with you, but the first time I saw an HD picture it was : : on a rear projection TV that was tuned to a channel broadcasting an HD : : picture, not a demo. I was immediately aware of the improved quality of : : the : : picture and more impressed because of the fact that it was rear : : projection. : : : : One of my friends moved recently and has a TV that he bought 3 years ago : : that was HD capable but he'd enver had it hooked up to a HD signal. Now : : that he has, he tells me he almost hates to go out because of the : : improvement. It's like watching everything for the first time. : : : : : : : : : : Don't worry, you aren't disagreeing with me. HD is brilliant - it is : : the future of HD that is going to be full of disappointment as more : : and more channels want to get in on the act. : : : : Not a problem.... the phone companies are gonna leapfrog the cable : : companies with FttP (fiber to the premise) and bring megabandwidth to the : : problem. : : : : Hows a 20 fold increase in bandwidth over cable sound? : : : : http://www22.verizon.com/about/commu...echnology.html : : : : Rollouts are in progress in virtually every major metro area in the country. : : : : ScottW : : : actually, it says: : " : a.. Fiber technology provides nearly unlimited bandwidth, : a.. as much as 20 times faster than today's fastest : a.. high-speed data connections." : : which is pretty nondescriptive. : around here, that'd be 400 Mbs, not bad, but rather underutilizing : fiber capacity. : : Gross underestimation of cable bandwidth noted. They don't like : publicize but you seem to be assuming that all of cables BW is used for : internet... I'm guessing its only a fraction. repeated reading error noted. it says "high speed data connections", that has nothing to do with the cable bandwidth. *that* would be, depending on length and quality, up to several Gbs for cable. you're confusing total capacity with the fraction that is currently reserved for _data connections_. : : For example... if 1080i HD requires 20 to 30 Mbs (I don't know the : number so I've no reason to doubt you).... then cable is bringing about : 400 Mbs into my home for HD alone today... I have no idea what the : total BW cable offers but if your number is correct... it has to be : around 2gig or so. that is what is broadcasted, not a data connection over cable. : : : 4 Mbs satellite up/downstreams i've seen are pretty : good for normal quality tv channels, HD done the right way is some : 20 to 30 Mbs, so no way you can have many HD channels on a 400 Mbs : capacity link : : some problems with ftth rollout: : : world fiber production capacity being where it is, just to facilitate the US : alone would take decades of production : : I am not aware of any fiber shortage... lets see a reference. Last I : looked.. Dow was having a problem keep fiber prices where they wanted : them. sorry, what *you*'re not aware of doesn't set any standard. as Ferstler would say: trust me, i know of what i speak :-) Rudy : : : the associated cost is not equipment, nor fiber cost, it's the digging that : is extremely costly - it'll have to be paid for in some way to make ftth viable : : Sure.. many cable companies went bankrupt after deployment... they : couldn't recover the cost of network rollout. Every satellite phone : offering did the same thing. I wouldn't be surprised if the phone : companies don't suffer in this project. But they have no choice. The : silly little twisted pair is going to leave them with no product anyone : wants and no customers. Plus they don't have to share fiber like : copper networks. Its they only way they can fight back against the : cable companies. If they don't.. they're doomed. : : ScottW |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's amazing what you can find when you look. | Audio Opinions | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |