Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I've been asked by a klezmer band to record a CD for them this spring. As it is, though, I have a fairly limited collection of mics, which consists of 2x Octava MC012 (soon to be Dorsey-modded), 2x CAD E-200, 3x SM57, 3x SM58. So, I'm interested in hearing how klezmer bands usually prefer to be recorded. This particular band consists of 2 violins, 1 trombone, 1 flute, 1 clarinet, 1 percussionist/saxophonist (I imagine only one at a time, though he is quite talented ;-) ), a piano, and a bass. One possibility of course is to stick the MC012s or E-200s in a stereo pair in a good location in a good room, put up a couple spot mics here or there on things that I think may need help in the mix, and hit "record". Does this sound like a viable option? Or would those who have experience with klezmer recommend more of a spot miked approach? As for input, I can easily accomodate 10-track, and if necessary can scale up to 18. My other two options as I see it would be a) do the tracking at a local studio with more access to suitable mics, or b) rent more suitable mics for tracking. I'd imagine a couple KM184s, C414s, or even possibly ribbon mics might be good bets on this ensemble. Unfortunately, the group has very low budget for the entire CD, so doing the entire tracking/mixing at a properly equipped studio isn't really an option. I imagine, given the style of music, that your typical rock-style overdubbing process is not at all appropriate, and any recording will have to be done all-at-once. I don't have any iso booth or headphone distribution available, but I do have access to several decently sized rooms of varying acoustic properties. Thanks -Todd Lipcon |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Todd Lipcon wrote: I've been asked by a klezmer band to record a CD for them this spring. As it is, though, I have a fairly limited collection of mics, which consists of 2x Octava MC012 (soon to be Dorsey-modded), 2x CAD E-200, 3x SM57, 3x SM58. So, I'm interested in hearing how klezmer bands usually prefer to be recorded. Don't ask us, ask them. See if they want to record completely live, whether they want to leave out lead parts (or maybe just vocals) and track them later, or if they want to build up tracks from a rhythm section, or something else. You should have enough stuff there to do whatever they want, but you should plan ahead. Make sure that they understand that if the want to record live, they can't fix or replace parts. But that if they don't have at least the core group playing live, they will never get the feel that they're after. They may need to practice playing without certain parts that they want to do as overdubs. 1 percussionist/saxophonist (I imagine only one at a time, though he is quite talented ;-) ) He probably does both when they play live and may want to do that when they record. Go to a show or a rehearsal or two and see how they work when they're not under pressure to record. I imagine, given the style of music, that your typical rock-style overdubbing process is not at all appropriate, and any recording will have to be done all-at-once. Not necessarily. For one thing, they might have "studio expectations" that can only be satisfied by isolating tracks. But they might want to overdub vocals, and perhaps solos that tend to get a little spirited and they might not want to live on their recording with what's a lot of fun on stage. You really need to talk this over with the group, explain the possibilities and decide how you want to work. They might be perfectly comfortable with doing a few live takes of each song, picking the best one, maybe doing a little editing from alternate takes, and it's done. Or they might want to make sure they can do some parts perfectly, which almost always means isolating (either in another room or at another time) and overdubbing. I've worked with more than one klezmer band where the leader has told me "the second fiddle player isn't very good so don't turn him up too loud." You have to be really careful if you have that kind of situation. I don't have any iso booth or headphone distribution available, but I do have access to several decently sized rooms of varying acoustic properties. I suspect that they'll want some sort of headphone mix unless you all agree that you can record them without isolation. You can probably do anything they want to do, but you need to work a plan out with the band so that they'll be both comfortable when recording and happy with the result. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Todd,
You might be best off trying the first approach (stereo mics on the band and then spot mics on as many instruments as you can use, given the restrictions of your equipment). If the band is good, and does a good job of controling their own volumes this could produce a first class recording. If nothing else, this approach should teach the musicians a thing or two about how to perform. Find a good hall to record in! if you're going to go the simple approach, the room acoustics are all important. You could certainly close mic everything, as well as a couple of room mics. How big is the percussion rig? Typically Klezmer has a drumset. You'll need to mic the kick as well as an overhead pair. More if possible. I would put up a different mic for the sax - the levels will be very different. But, how confident are you that you can mix this all and get a good sound? That's the beauty of the two mic approach. I used to do live sound for the Klezmer Conservatory here in Boston. We miced everything as if it were a rock band. I believe they did the same thing in the studio (engineered by my friend and often partner, George Hicks). The more mics you use the more assurance that you've got what you want. But, at the same time, the more mics you use, the harder it will be to get a good balanced mix. It will all depend on your time and talent. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
First, thanks for all the quick responses. And now my response to the various questions/suggestions: Mike Rivers wrote: Don't ask us, ask them. Of course ![]() check in with RAP to see if anyone had experience from this end of the process. The band is Brown University's klezmer band, Yarmulkazi. Being a student group, they don't record that often, so probably don't have a lot of fixed expectations. I suspect that they'll want some sort of headphone mix unless you all agree that you can record them without isolation I wish I could provide this, but the majority of recording I do is either live performance or all-together sessions, and I'm not making enough money to justify buying even a cheapo headphone amp. Most of my gigs don't have the time to do the whole overdubbing process. Ken [Google is obscuring his last name] wrote: You could certainly close mic everything, as well as a couple of room mics. That's what I was figuring. I just feel like I'm short a couple mics to do all the instruments justice. Wish I had a pair of 414s ![]() How big is the percussion rig? Typically Klezmer has a drumset. You'll need to mic the kick as well as an overhead pair. Yup, I'm familiar with this setup, and that was my plan as well if going with individual mics. More if possible. I would put up a different mic for the sax - the levels will be very different. But, how confident are you that you can mix this all and get a good sound? That's the beauty of the two mic approach. I'm by no means an expert mixer, but this is probably my 5th or 6th full length CD that would come from a multitrack, so I'm not a rank newbie either. I have a lot of musical training, so the balancing act isn't too tough, and I've done 15+ theatre sound designs as well, so my ears have decent training for EQ, compression, etc. Mark wrote: where I you located?? Providence, RI. I'm also a student at Brown University. I would also get some CDs of other Klezmer groups and review them with your group and ask them how they would like to sound compared to those... Good idea. I'll ask the person who contacted me if he has some sample CDs I could borrow to get a sense of the musical style, as it is not one with which I am very familiar. Thanks for all the help, Todd |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Todd Lipcon wrote: Hi all, First, thanks for all the quick responses. And now my response to the various questions/suggestions: Mike Rivers wrote: Don't ask us, ask them. Of course ![]() check in with RAP to see if anyone had experience from this end of the process. The band is Brown University's klezmer band, Yarmulkazi. Being a student group, they don't record that often, so probably don't have a lot of fixed expectations. I suspect that they'll want some sort of headphone mix unless you all agree that you can record them without isolation I wish I could provide this, but the majority of recording I do is either live performance or all-together sessions, and I'm not making enough money to justify buying even a cheapo headphone amp. Most of my gigs don't have the time to do the whole overdubbing process. Ken [Google is obscuring his last name] wrote: You could certainly close mic everything, as well as a couple of room mics. That's what I was figuring. I just feel like I'm short a couple mics to do all the instruments justice. Wish I had a pair of 414s ![]() How big is the percussion rig? Typically Klezmer has a drumset. You'll need to mic the kick as well as an overhead pair. Yup, I'm familiar with this setup, and that was my plan as well if going with individual mics. More if possible. I would put up a different mic for the sax - the levels will be very different. But, how confident are you that you can mix this all and get a good sound? That's the beauty of the two mic approach. I'm by no means an expert mixer, but this is probably my 5th or 6th full length CD that would come from a multitrack, so I'm not a rank newbie either. I have a lot of musical training, so the balancing act isn't too tough, and I've done 15+ theatre sound designs as well, so my ears have decent training for EQ, compression, etc. Mark wrote: where I you located?? Providence, RI. I'm also a student at Brown University. I would also get some CDs of other Klezmer groups and review them with your group and ask them how they would like to sound compared to those... Good idea. I'll ask the person who contacted me if he has some sample CDs I could borrow to get a sense of the musical style, as it is not one with which I am very familiar. Thanks for all the help, Todd Todd, could you email me at mkolber "at" verizon "dot" net I may be interested in working with you on this project if you are interested in help Mark .. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Todd Lipcon" wrote in message
oups.com... I've been asked by a klezmer band to record a CD for them this spring. As it is, though, I have a fairly limited collection of mics, which consists of 2x Octava MC012 (soon to be Dorsey-modded), 2x CAD E-200, 3x SM57, 3x SM58. So, I'm interested in hearing how klezmer bands usually prefer to be recorded. This particular band consists of 2 violins, 1 trombone, 1 flute, 1 clarinet, 1 percussionist/saxophonist (I imagine only one at a time, though he is quite talented ;-) ), a piano, and a bass. One possibility of course is to stick the MC012s or E-200s in a stereo pair in a good location in a good room, put up a couple spot mics here or there on things that I think may need help in the mix, and hit "record". Does this sound like a viable option? Or would those who have experience with klezmer recommend more of a spot miked approach? If you can do it, I'd try that first. The hard part will, as always, be finding a room that's (a) acoustically good; (b) available; (c) quiet; and (d) equipped with a good piano. But if you can, my bet is you could get a *dynamite* recording. Maybe rent a couple of KM84s (if available, or KM184s if not) to spot the fiddles. My other two options as I see it would be a) do the tracking at a local studio with more access to suitable mics, or b) rent more suitable mics for tracking. I'd imagine a couple KM184s, C414s, or even possibly ribbon mics might be good bets on this ensemble. Unfortunately, the group has very low budget for the entire CD, so doing the entire tracking/mixing at a properly equipped studio isn't really an option. I think these would also be viable options; if you're a good mixer, you should be able to do a good "in-the-box" mix on this band. I imagine, given the style of music, that your typical rock-style overdubbing process is not at all appropriate, and any recording will have to be done all-at-once. I don't have any iso booth or headphone distribution available, but I do have access to several decently sized rooms of varying acoustic properties. If you wind up going multitrack, try first recording everyone in one room anyway; if you manage the leakage properly, you can get a very good-sounding recording, and the interaction is *always* better in a single room than over headphones in another room. Peace, Paul |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Todd Lipcon wrote: the majority of recording I do is either live performance or all-together sessions, and I'm not making enough money to justify buying even a cheapo headphone amp. Most of my gigs don't have the time to do the whole overdubbing process. In that case, you really don't have any options. You should explain this to the band, and either they'll go along with it or they'll look for someone else to record them. They may or may not get a better reording, but if they're uncomfortable with people actualy hearing what they play they should do what makes them happy. If the band is good, you should be able to do a perfectly reasonable job. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |