| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Golden-Ears Myth
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:14:53 GMT, wrote:
"dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:53:42 +0000, Pooh Bear wrote: 124 wrote: If an audiophile spends more than $200 000 US for a power amplifier and is presented with evidence that it sounds identical to a $200 receiver, to accept the evidence would mean a devastating blow to that audiophile's ego . If I spent that kind of money on a power amplifier and was presented with the evidence, there is a very good chance that I would never accept the evidence. The correct term is audiophool. ;-) Graham So, the person who owns a Rolex is a phool as well? If he thinks it's going to tell time better than a Timex. One could argue that it does. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FS: (UPDATED) David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books | Pro Audio | |||
| FS: David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books | Pro Audio | |||
| James Randi Million US$ Challenge To Well-Known Golden Ears! | Tech | |||
| Ant golden ears here? | Tech | |||
| Golden Ears CDs | High End Audio | |||
Hybrid Mode
