Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
 
Posts: n/a
Default Golden-Ears Myth


Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com
Pooh Bear wrote:
124 wrote:

If an audiophile spends more than $200 000 US
for a power amplifier and is presented with evidence
that it sounds identical to a $200 receiver, to accept
the evidence would mean a devastating blow to that
audiophile's ego . If I spent that kind of money on a
power amplifier and was presented with the evidence,
there is a very good chance that I would never accept
the evidence.

The correct term is audiophool. ;-)

Graham


And a virtuoso who buys a Stradivarius is another
audiophool so very different from our clever Pooh Bear
who ABXes it against neighbourhood music store violins,
hears "no difference" and pats himself on the back: "No
golden ear will take this bear for a ride.


Oh GMAB Ludo. It's easy to hear the difference between good violins and bad
violins. It's easy to hear the difference between two different good
violins.


Arny, Arny you must remember that you once said that loudspeakers were
not worth ABXing because anyone could hear the difference. Well, not
anyone. 200 out of 260 Olive's panelists could not as long as they were
bothered by blinding and answering to "Is A like B?'
But they ceased having a problem once they concentrated on what they
liked best.
Are violins just as "easy" to compare A vs B as loudspeakers? Why don't
you try ABXing them.and report. I trust you'll tell the truth and I'll
even let you off level matching.
Ludovic Mirabel
By the way- what doe GMAB stand for? I'm sure you would not be rude to
your old pal.

  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default Golden-Ears Myth

wrote in message
oups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com
Pooh Bear wrote:
124 wrote:

If an audiophile spends more than $200 000 US
for a power amplifier and is presented with evidence
that it sounds identical to a $200 receiver, to accept
the evidence would mean a devastating blow to that
audiophile's ego . If I spent that kind of money on a
power amplifier and was presented with the evidence,
there is a very good chance that I would never accept
the evidence.

The correct term is audiophool. ;-)

Graham

And a virtuoso who buys a Stradivarius is another
audiophool so very different from our clever Pooh Bear
who ABXes it against neighbourhood music store violins,
hears "no difference" and pats himself on the back: "No
golden ear will take this bear for a ride.


Oh GMAB Ludo. It's easy to hear the difference between
good violins and bad violins. It's easy to hear the
difference between two different good violins.


Arny, Arny you must remember that you once said that
loudspeakers were not worth ABXing because anyone could
hear the difference. Well, not anyone. 200 out of 260
Olive's panelists could not as long as they were bothered
by blinding and answering to "Is A like B?'


I'm not buying it Ludo. Prove it with a cite from an online source.



Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: (UPDATED) David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books Chris T. Young Pro Audio 0 August 26th 04 04:24 AM
FS: David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books Chris T. Young Pro Audio 0 August 25th 04 03:52 PM
James Randi Million US$ Challenge To Well-Known Golden Ears! Arny Krueger Tech 2 August 24th 04 04:14 AM
Ant golden ears here? Tom Tech 37 January 9th 04 05:59 PM
Golden Ears CDs All Ears High End Audio 0 September 15th 03 08:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"