Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message oups.com Pooh Bear wrote: 124 wrote: If an audiophile spends more than $200 000 US for a power amplifier and is presented with evidence that it sounds identical to a $200 receiver, to accept the evidence would mean a devastating blow to that audiophile's ego . If I spent that kind of money on a power amplifier and was presented with the evidence, there is a very good chance that I would never accept the evidence. The correct term is audiophool. ;-) Graham And a virtuoso who buys a Stradivarius is another audiophool so very different from our clever Pooh Bear who ABXes it against neighbourhood music store violins, hears "no difference" and pats himself on the back: "No golden ear will take this bear for a ride. Oh GMAB Ludo. It's easy to hear the difference between good violins and bad violins. It's easy to hear the difference between two different good violins. Arny, Arny you must remember that you once said that loudspeakers were not worth ABXing because anyone could hear the difference. Well, not anyone. 200 out of 260 Olive's panelists could not as long as they were bothered by blinding and answering to "Is A like B?' But they ceased having a problem once they concentrated on what they liked best. Are violins just as "easy" to compare A vs B as loudspeakers? Why don't you try ABXing them.and report. I trust you'll tell the truth and I'll even let you off level matching. Ludovic Mirabel By the way- what doe GMAB stand for? I'm sure you would not be rude to your old pal. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message oups.com Pooh Bear wrote: 124 wrote: If an audiophile spends more than $200 000 US for a power amplifier and is presented with evidence that it sounds identical to a $200 receiver, to accept the evidence would mean a devastating blow to that audiophile's ego . If I spent that kind of money on a power amplifier and was presented with the evidence, there is a very good chance that I would never accept the evidence. The correct term is audiophool. ;-) Graham And a virtuoso who buys a Stradivarius is another audiophool so very different from our clever Pooh Bear who ABXes it against neighbourhood music store violins, hears "no difference" and pats himself on the back: "No golden ear will take this bear for a ride. Oh GMAB Ludo. It's easy to hear the difference between good violins and bad violins. It's easy to hear the difference between two different good violins. Arny, Arny you must remember that you once said that loudspeakers were not worth ABXing because anyone could hear the difference. Well, not anyone. 200 out of 260 Olive's panelists could not as long as they were bothered by blinding and answering to "Is A like B?' I'm not buying it Ludo. Prove it with a cite from an online source. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: (UPDATED) David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books | Pro Audio | |||
FS: David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books | Pro Audio | |||
James Randi Million US$ Challenge To Well-Known Golden Ears! | Tech | |||
Ant golden ears here? | Tech | |||
Golden Ears CDs | High End Audio |