Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pooh Bear wrote: 124 wrote: If an audiophile spends more than $200 000 US for a power amplifier and is presented with evidence that it sounds identical to a $200 receiver, to accept the evidence would mean a devastating blow to that audiophile's ego . If I spent that kind of money on a power amplifier and was presented with the evidence, there is a very good chance that I would never accept the evidence. The correct term is audiophool. ;-) Graham And a virtuoso who buys a Stradivarius is another audiophool so very different from our clever Pooh Bear who ABXes it against neighbourhood music store violins, hears "no difference" and pats himself on the back: "No golden ear will take this bear for a ride. Ludovic Mirabel" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: (UPDATED) David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books | Pro Audio | |||
FS: David Moulton (Golden Ears fame) Books & Other Great Recording Books | Pro Audio | |||
James Randi Million US$ Challenge To Well-Known Golden Ears! | Tech | |||
Ant golden ears here? | Tech | |||
Golden Ears CDs | High End Audio |