Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com Arny Krueger wrote: THD as speced by the manufacturer is not the only measure of equipment quality. For example, a lot of the HP equipment would meet spec near their end of life or the end of life of their tubes. while Heathkit equipment might meet spec only if routinely maintained. The HP generators derived from the Model 200 will run forever, or at least more than one human lifetime. If you use them a lot, the tubes wear out. There are no proprietary parts that are likely to wear out with normal use. Tubes have always been proprietary parts. OK, you HP 200C has say a 6SN7 in it. Which manufacturer's 6SN7 is the right one to use? If needed the transformers and the tuning capacitor could be repro'd for far less setup costs than having a replacement IC taped out, masked and a run made such as would be needed on many solid state units using proprietary ICs. The tube-bigot lie here is that most ICs in good audio test equipment are standard parts, or can be readily replaced with standard parts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's amazing what you can find when you look. | Audio Opinions |