Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Ritola" wrote in message news:SxZnf.6065 since FM cannot support the entire audible range in stereo, you get some lower fidelity. The modulation/demodulation processes at the transmitter and receiver pretty much finish off any chance. ): Sorry to rain on the parade, but radio's a nasty thing to music. and if it weren't for radio, you wouldn't hear any new music or even know that it existed, no ? Maybe you might hear the odd new tune at a club, but you woulkdn't necessarily know what or who it was. a.m. radio is even worse for fidelity, but many ( most ) listeners are tuning into that for music. so in your estimation then, a.m. radio is an abomination is it ? use radio for what it is, it has it's strengths and waeknesses, like everything else. I can't carry 100s of diamond hand-cut vinyl discs, and a personal DJ in the back of the car, or on the train or the bus. listen. make a note of artist / song. buy a CD or vinyl disc later. if you must, record the radio, and process away to your heart's content ! just be aware that to get the best quality legally you MUST BUY. if you are prepared to put up with less than the "best", and many are, then carry on regardless. ;-) ............. Lloyd George |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You make some points, but:
a.m. radio is even worse for fidelity, but many ( most ) listeners are tuning into that for music. so in your estimation then, a.m. radio is an abomination is it ? Just out of curiosity, what part of the world are you in? There's virtually no music on AM in the USA. Is there still a good bit in Britain? Actually, rather high-fidelity AM is possible, though rare. At the transmitter end, you need to demodulate the transmitted signal and include it in the audio feedback loop, so you're controlling what actually goes out on the air rather than just what goes to the modulator. At the receiver end, you need wide bandwidth, much wider than we normally have. An AM radio can be aligned for high fidelity by first doing a conventional alignment, and then tuning alternate IF transformers somewhat high and low. The signal gets weaker but has a lot more treble. Fifty years ago, hi-fi AM enthusiasts used TRF rather than superheterodyne tuners (and could only get strong local signals, but they sounded very good). If there were music on the local AM stations, I'd experiment with that myself. One big reason hi-fi AM hasn't caught on is that AM is noise-prone. FM can exclude noise; AM can't. BTW, what ever became of AM stereo? |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mc wrote:
snip BTW, what ever became of AM stereo? It is still another proof that one cannot polish a turd. -- ================================================== ====================== Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make | two, one and one make one." mrkesti at comcast dot net | - The Who, Bargain |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael R. Kesti" wrote in message ... mc wrote: snip BTW, what ever became of AM stereo? It is still another proof that one cannot polish a turd. I disagree with that statement. When I was a broadcast engineer, one of the stations I worked for was AM. The entire transmitting system was capable of 15KHz audio. It sounded just like monophonic FM on the modulation monitor. Unfortunately, radios that can adequately demodulate hi-fi AM are more expensive, so there seems to be little market demand for them. Hi-fi stereo AM is technically feasible, but its time is probably past. Most AM broadcasters in the US have gone to all-talk formats, where hi-fi and stereo are relatively unimportant. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Karl Uppiano wrote:
"Michael R. Kesti" wrote in message ... mc wrote: snip BTW, what ever became of AM stereo? It is still another proof that one cannot polish a turd. I disagree with that statement. When I was a broadcast engineer, one of the stations I worked for was AM. The entire transmitting system was capable of 15KHz audio. It sounded just like monophonic FM on the modulation monitor. Was this station in the USA? What is/was its call sign? snip -- ================================================== ====================== Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make | two, one and one make one." mrkesti at comcast dot net | - The Who, Bargain |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael R. Kesti" wrote in message ... Karl Uppiano wrote: "Michael R. Kesti" wrote in message ... mc wrote: snip BTW, what ever became of AM stereo? It is still another proof that one cannot polish a turd. I disagree with that statement. When I was a broadcast engineer, one of the stations I worked for was AM. The entire transmitting system was capable of 15KHz audio. It sounded just like monophonic FM on the modulation monitor. Was this station in the USA? What is/was its call sign? The station was KCID AM in Caldwell, ID. 1490KHz/1KW. I worked there from 1978 to 1986. I don't think it's there anymore. When I took it over, the studio-transmitter link was 5KHz telephone lines. One of my first projects was to install a microwave STL which gave us 15KHz bandwidth end-to-end. Then I spent considerable effort bringing the entire audio chain up to FM specs. My goal was to pass an FM audio proof of performance on an AM station, and the management at the time supported this goal. We met this goal for all of the parameters that were applicable to AM. Noise and distortion were the most difficult parameters to keep in spec. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Karl Uppiano wrote:
The station was KCID AM in Caldwell, ID. 1490KHz/1KW. I worked there from 1978 to 1986. I don't think it's there anymore. Google indicates otherwise, unless the pages it finds are out of date. When I took it over, the studio-transmitter link was 5KHz telephone lines. One of my first projects was to install a microwave STL which gave us 15KHz bandwidth end-to-end. Then I spent considerable effort bringing the entire audio chain up to FM specs. My goal was to pass an FM audio proof of performance on an AM station, and the management at the time supported this goal. We met this goal for all of the parameters that were applicable to AM. Noise and distortion were the most difficult parameters to keep in spec. AM stations in the standard broadcast band are limited to 10 Khz modulation bandwidth and therefore to 5 Khz audio bandwidth. It would seem, then, that your station was in violation of bandwidth limitations. -- ================================================== ====================== Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make | two, one and one make one." mrkesti at comcast dot net | - The Who, Bargain |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mc" wrote in message ... BTW, what ever became of AM stereo? Last heard of in South Africa & Zimbabwe AFAIK the left and right channels had seperate carriers, and you needed either a fancy, double tuner radio reciever ( for your living room setup ) or you could just tune in two transistor radios ( one for each channel ). .......... Lloyd |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mixing, Any additional suggestions? | Pro Audio | |||
enhancing early reflections? | Pro Audio | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Some Mixing Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Creating Dimension In Mixing- PDF available on Request (112 pages0 | Pro Audio |