Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George M. Middius wrote:
Andre Jute said: Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281: The count might actually be higher, Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering method for Arny's lies. (200) elided 5 -- fifth year of the century 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year, which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it. This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition. Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle. I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of RAO chief liar. Your humble servant, Andre Jute |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andre Jute" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: Andre Jute said: Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281: The count might actually be higher, Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering method for Arny's lies. (200) elided 5 -- fifth year of the century 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year, which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it. This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition. Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle. I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of RAO chief liar. Your humble servant, Andre Jute This seems to be a reasonable methodology. It might be worthwhile to cross-index them according to subject material as well. For this purpose, I nominate the Dewey Decimal System, which should accomodate Arny's ability to transmogrify truthful information within any subdomain of knowledge. The suggested elision of the century assumes that Krueger's lying spirit will not survive the destruction of his mortal body. I hope this decision is vindicated. Furthermore, I propose the following neologism(s), for the activity which involves buggering the truth for self-serving psychological motives: "kruegerize", or simply, "krueger". Examples of use may be found at http://www.unknownnews.net/040723a-mz.html |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert Morein wrote: "Andre Jute" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: Andre Jute said: Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281: The count might actually be higher, Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering method for Arny's lies. (200) elided 5 -- fifth year of the century 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year, which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it. This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition. Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle. I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of RAO chief liar. Your humble servant, Andre Jute This seems to be a reasonable methodology. It might be worthwhile to cross-index them according to subject material as well. For this purpose, I nominate the Dewey Decimal System, which should accomodate Arny's ability to transmogrify truthful information within any subdomain of knowledge. The suggested elision of the century assumes that Krueger's lying spirit will not survive the destruction of his mortal body. I hope this decision is vindicated. Bloody hell, Robert, you will us nightmares! Furthermore, I propose the following neologism(s), for the activity which involves buggering the truth for self-serving psychological motives: "kruegerize", or simply, "krueger". I like it! "He kruegered the truth." It definitely has the right brutal image conjured up by Krueger's regular rape of the truth without the vulgarity of language to which anger at Krueger's lies may otherwise tempt perfectly decent folk. Andre Jute |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andre Jute" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: Andre Jute said: Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281: The count might actually be higher, Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering method for Arny's lies. (200) elided 5 -- fifth year of the century 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year, which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it. This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition. Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle. I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of RAO chief liar. Your humble servant, Andre Jute Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andre Jute" wrote in message ups.com... Robert Morein wrote: "Andre Jute" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: Andre Jute said: Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281: The count might actually be higher, Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering method for Arny's lies. (200) elided 5 -- fifth year of the century 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year, which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it. This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition. Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle. I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of RAO chief liar. Your humble servant, Andre Jute This seems to be a reasonable methodology. It might be worthwhile to cross-index them according to subject material as well. For this purpose, I nominate the Dewey Decimal System, which should accomodate Arny's ability to transmogrify truthful information within any subdomain of knowledge. The suggested elision of the century assumes that Krueger's lying spirit will not survive the destruction of his mortal body. I hope this decision is vindicated. Bloody hell, Robert, you will us nightmares! Furthermore, I propose the following neologism(s), for the activity which involves buggering the truth for self-serving psychological motives: "kruegerize", or simply, "krueger". I like it! "He kruegered the truth." It definitely has the right brutal image conjured up by Krueger's regular rape of the truth without the vulgarity of language to which anger at Krueger's lies may otherwise tempt perfectly decent folk. Andre Jute So you want to take the suggestions of a liar and technical incompetent to attack someone who tells the truth and IS technically competent. How long have you lived on Bizarro world? |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message nk.net... [snip] So you want to take the suggestions of a liar and technical incompetent to attack someone who tells the truth and IS technically competent. How long have you lived on Bizarro world? Bingo! Mikey, you sure krugered the truth about Arny. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message nk.net... : Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of : times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent. : for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_ hehe take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-) |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ruud Broens" wrote in message ... wrote in message nk.net... : Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of : times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent. : for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_ hehe take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-) I've just been immortalized in a mathematical series. Ain't bad. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... : : "Ruud Broens" wrote in message : ... : : wrote in message : nk.net... : : Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number : of : : times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent. : : : for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_ : : hehe : take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-) : : I've just been immortalized in a mathematical series. : Ain't bad. : ...but did Mimck get _the other stand_ ? ;-) R. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message nk.net... "Andre Jute" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: Andre Jute said: Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281: The count might actually be higher, Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering method for Arny's lies. (200) elided 5 -- fifth year of the century 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year, which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it. This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition. Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle. I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of RAO chief liar. Your humble servant, Andre Jute Take that number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent. Corrected spelling for the nitpickers. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ruud Broens" wrote in message ... wrote in message nk.net... : Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of : times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent. : for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_ hehe take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-) I have been at least as rigorous in my calculations and conclusions as Bobby. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A modest proposal for Stereophile | High End Audio | |||
George's site | Audio Opinions | |||
How many people listen to FM ? | Audio Opinions | |||
Snuff Flicks - Arny Krueger's new hobby | Audio Opinions |