Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Stephen McElroy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense

In article ,
"Norman M. Schwartz" wrote:

Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and
Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't
pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did happen.
Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not.


Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell
or Bernstein to cast doubt on that. The story is Szell's home system
had sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad
for the rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of
multi-channel mixing possibilities.

Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his
hearing along with his age, but he was interested in the latest
recording technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo,
multi-track, digital.

Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well.

An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears.

Stephen
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Jenn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense

In article ,
Stephen McElroy wrote:

In article ,
"Norman M. Schwartz" wrote:

Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and
Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't
pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did happen.
Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not.


Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell
or Bernstein to cast doubt on that.


That's for sure. Virtually every LP after the "blue label" era was bad
sounding, IMO. A shame, really. I lay some of this at the doorstep of
producer John McClure.

The story is Szell's home system
had sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad
for the rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of
multi-channel mixing possibilities.

Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his
hearing along with his age, but he was interested in the latest
recording technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo,
multi-track, digital.

Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well.

An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears.

Stephen

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Norman M. Schwartz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense

"Stephen McElroy" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Norman M. Schwartz" wrote:

Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and
Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't
pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did
happen.
Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not.


Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell or
Bernstein to cast doubt on that. The story is Szell's home system had
sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad for the
rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of multi-channel mixing
possibilities.

Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his hearing
along with his age, but he was interested in the latest recording
technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo, multi-track,
digital.

Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well.

An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears.

They trust their own ears all right, why shouldn't they? An ability to make
music sound good in the hall does not translate into being able to make it
sound good in the small listening areas in homes.

  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Jenn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense

In article ,
"Norman M. Schwartz" wrote:

"Stephen McElroy" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Norman M. Schwartz" wrote:

Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and
Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't
pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did
happen.
Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not.


Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell or
Bernstein to cast doubt on that. The story is Szell's home system had
sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad for the
rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of multi-channel mixing
possibilities.

Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his hearing
along with his age, but he was interested in the latest recording
technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo, multi-track,
digital.

Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well.

An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears.

They trust their own ears all right, why shouldn't they? An ability to make
music sound good in the hall does not translate into being able to make it
sound good in the small listening areas in homes.


Which is not a claim that has been made, of course.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense Bob Marcus High End Audio 154 December 26th 05 04:57 PM
Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense Jenn High End Audio 90 December 3rd 05 05:55 PM
discrimination and perception (da capo, in the Italian sense) Mark DeBellis High End Audio 45 November 24th 05 06:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"