Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Norman M. Schwartz" wrote: Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did happen. Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not. Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell or Bernstein to cast doubt on that. The story is Szell's home system had sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad for the rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of multi-channel mixing possibilities. Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his hearing along with his age, but he was interested in the latest recording technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo, multi-track, digital. Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well. An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears. Stephen |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stephen McElroy wrote: In article , "Norman M. Schwartz" wrote: Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did happen. Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not. Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell or Bernstein to cast doubt on that. That's for sure. Virtually every LP after the "blue label" era was bad sounding, IMO. A shame, really. I lay some of this at the doorstep of producer John McClure. The story is Szell's home system had sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad for the rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of multi-channel mixing possibilities. Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his hearing along with his age, but he was interested in the latest recording technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo, multi-track, digital. Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well. An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears. Stephen |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen McElroy" wrote in message
... In article , "Norman M. Schwartz" wrote: Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did happen. Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not. Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell or Bernstein to cast doubt on that. The story is Szell's home system had sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad for the rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of multi-channel mixing possibilities. Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his hearing along with his age, but he was interested in the latest recording technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo, multi-track, digital. Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well. An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears. They trust their own ears all right, why shouldn't they? An ability to make music sound good in the hall does not translate into being able to make it sound good in the small listening areas in homes. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Norman M. Schwartz" wrote: "Stephen McElroy" wrote in message ... In article , "Norman M. Schwartz" wrote: Isn't it true that the likes of George Szell, van Karajan, Bernstein and Stokowski influenced the result of their product in a bad way? I don't pretend to know or understand how such a thing happened, but it did happen. Why would you trust their ears in our hobby? I certainly would not. Columbia/CBS had enough bad sounding productions not involving Szell or Bernstein to cast doubt on that. The story is Szell's home system had sub-optimum speaker placement that would lead to eq choices bad for the rest of us. Bernstein was supposedly enamored of multi-channel mixing possibilities. Karajan's jet plane and race car hobbies might have affected his hearing along with his age, but he was interested in the latest recording technology. Look at his Beethoven cycles: mono, stereo, multi-track, digital. Stokie was recording by the 1920s so age could be a factor there as well. An underlying point is that conductors trust their own ears. They trust their own ears all right, why shouldn't they? An ability to make music sound good in the hall does not translate into being able to make it sound good in the small listening areas in homes. Which is not a claim that has been made, of course. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense | High End Audio | |||
Fine (fee-nay), in the Italian sense | High End Audio | |||
discrimination and perception (da capo, in the Italian sense) | High End Audio |