Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
the question i recently put to Arny, how would you go about comparing different drivers for some loudspeaker design (assuming a multi-driver setup) ? say, a tweeter: you'll have different frequency range, different frequency response, different sensitivity , different dispersion, different power handling capacity, different impedance, etc., etc. now, say you'd have a perfect 10 Hz - 6 kHz 'lower part' of the design ready, how to compare these different tweeters ? The way its commonly done is to build a number of complete systems differing as little as possible given that each represents the best you can do, including the various alternatives. for starters, you'll need different xo's for the drivers so you're not _really_ comparing apples with apples as some tweeters will 'use' more of the range produced by the lower part than others :-) This really isn't a stumbling block at all. The end goal is to produce the system that best conforms to your expectations. If you go into production with any of the systems, of course your production model would include the necessary variations in crossovers, etc. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
we found 20 new TUBE AMPLIFIER companies | Audio Opinions | |||
we found 20 new TUBE AMPLIFIER companies | Pro Audio | |||
we found 20 new TUBE AMPLIFIER companies | Vacuum Tubes | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) | Car Audio | |||
World Tube Audio Newsletter 06/05 | Vacuum Tubes |