Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , dave weil wrote :
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:55:28 +0100, Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: Son knock any neighbor girls up yet? I don't understand this one. Has your son up-knocked yet any neighbor girls? No, that reads funny. Thank you Stephen. I don't need any explanation about this simple sentence. I understood what Dave wrote that's not really a problem for me. So, you were lying yet again. Not at all. I understood the 2 sentences separatly but I cannot make any relation between them and that let me perplexed. The first of them could be interpreted according to what I wrote before but what about the second ???? IMO it demonstrates me that one more time I have granted to much importance to your delirium. My blind generosity will lose me. Cool. I don't know. But you will note that it doesn't explain your sudden interest for my chidren sexual life. Are you a pervert ? A pedophile ? -- "Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote. But what's new around here?" Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:16:58 +0100, Lionel
spun to avoid being seen as a liar: In , dave weil wrote : On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:55:28 +0100, Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: Son knock any neighbor girls up yet? I don't understand this one. Has your son up-knocked yet any neighbor girls? No, that reads funny. Thank you Stephen. I don't need any explanation about this simple sentence. I understood what Dave wrote that's not really a problem for me. So, you were lying yet again. Not at all. I understood the 2 sentences separatly but I cannot make any relation between them and that let me perplexed. The first of them could be interpreted according to what I wrote before but what about the second ???? You're just a simple liar. And I put a special emphasis on the word liar. IMO it demonstrates me that one more time I have granted to much importance to your delirium. I will agree that you have granted me far too much importance. Whatever keeps you from your family, I suppose. I guess I'm your diversion, gramps. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , dave weil wrote :
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:16:58 +0100, Lionel spun to avoid being seen as a liar: In , dave weil wrote : On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:55:28 +0100, Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: Son knock any neighbor girls up yet? I don't understand this one. Has your son up-knocked yet any neighbor girls? No, that reads funny. Thank you Stephen. I don't need any explanation about this simple sentence. I understood what Dave wrote that's not really a problem for me. So, you were lying yet again. Not at all. I understood the 2 sentences separatly but I cannot make any relation between them and that let me perplexed. The first of them could be interpreted according to what I wrote before but what about the second ???? You're just a simple liar. And I put a special emphasis on the word liar. You can put all the emphasis you want. What interest would I have in lying about that ? Your sentence was so basic, 4 simple words that I have learned at the primary school. son = fils knock = frapper neighbor = voisin girls = filles Even for me it's not a big deal to imagine what they can mean when assembled together and destined to an adolescent. Moreover may I remember you that you have already approached the subject several times during the last days ?. No the *real* and *only* question that you refuse to answer is why are you so interested in my son's sexuality ? Are you requesting some crunchy details ? Something to feed your dying libido ? Anyway your insistance is disgusting and touching to the obsession, Dave, IMHO you are a pervert. Note that it's a real *pleasure* for me, and in this case I put a special emphasis on the word *pleasure*, to see you flirting with the dishonor because of your incontrollable anger, rage and frustration. Everytime you want, pitiful old braggart, I am your servitor... ;-) -- "Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote. But what's new around here?" Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:15:08 +0100, Lionel
wrote: In , dave weil wrote : On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:16:58 +0100, Lionel spun to avoid being seen as a liar: In , dave weil wrote : On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:55:28 +0100, Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: Son knock any neighbor girls up yet? I don't understand this one. Has your son up-knocked yet any neighbor girls? No, that reads funny. Thank you Stephen. I don't need any explanation about this simple sentence. I understood what Dave wrote that's not really a problem for me. So, you were lying yet again. Not at all. I understood the 2 sentences separatly but I cannot make any relation between them and that let me perplexed. The first of them could be interpreted according to what I wrote before but what about the second ???? You're just a simple liar. And I put a special emphasis on the word liar. You can put all the emphasis you want. What interest would I have in lying about that ? Your sentence was so basic, 4 simple words that I have learned at the primary school. son = fils knock = frapper neighbor = voisin girls = filles Even for me it's not a big deal to imagine what they can mean when assembled together and destined to an adolescent. Perhaps you should try to parse the phrase " I don't understand this one" as closely. Hope that this "quality internet time" is keeping you from whipping your son's hide. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave "deaf" weil wrote :
Perhaps you should try to parse the phrase " I don't understand this one" as closely. I have. In the context your sentence hadn't any sens. This is why I have written that. Hope that this "quality internet time" is keeping you from whipping your son's hide. Why are you insisting like that about my son, you old pervert ? Seems to me that you are desperatly trying to make me "speak" about your *family*. Oh, the nasty stratagem !!! Oh, the vicious mummy !!! I don't forget that you have already used such tactic against Arnold Krueger. I also remember that after he gave you satisfaction you was crying and sobbing on all usenet audio groups : "have you seen what Arny has written about my father/girlfriend/mother !!!". Aren't you tired of this unshame and disgusting instrumentation of your own family ? No way oldster !!! This time I will let you the full responsability of your own decrepitude. I repeat that it's a real pleasure for me, with the a special emphasis on *pleasure*, to see you flirting with the dishonor because of your incontrollable anger, rage and frustration. Be careful, fragile oldster, you are marginalizing yourself and charging strait to the nervous breakdown... PS : are you sure you aren't neglecting your roses ? :-D -- "Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote. But what's new around here?" Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:26:09 +0100, Lionel
wrote: PS : are you sure you aren't neglecting your roses ? Yep. They're dormant. Now what's your excuse for neglecting your family? Are THEY dormant? |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:26:09 +0100, Lionel
wrote: Be careful, fragile oldster, you are marginalizing yourself and charging strait to the nervous breakdown... Sounds "Dire". Well gramps, time for you to imagine impossible things about speakers again... Oh yeah, take a deep breath. You seem to be on the edge of implosion. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave "deaf" weil wrote :
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:26:09 +0100, Lionel wrote: Be careful, fragile oldster, you are marginalizing yourself and charging strait to the nervous breakdown... Sounds "Dire". Are you calmed ? Seems that you finally had enough stuff to get a little erection. Well gramps, time for you to imagine impossible things about speakers again... And you to write ineptitude about them... dreaming that you are a respected writer. ;-) Why don't you try to write about roses, at least you don't need to hear correctly... Oh no, don't tell me you have also vision problems. Oh yeah, take a deep breath. You seem to be on the edge of implosion. No I prefer to hold my breath up to the next time you will grotesquely try to make me "speak" about your family. I bet that will be very soon... You're such a crybaby. :-D -- "Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote. But what's new around here?" Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
we found 20 new TUBE AMPLIFIER companies | Audio Opinions | |||
we found 20 new TUBE AMPLIFIER companies | Pro Audio | |||
we found 20 new TUBE AMPLIFIER companies | Vacuum Tubes | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) | Car Audio | |||
World Tube Audio Newsletter 06/05 | Vacuum Tubes |