"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...


Because that would be foolish for a reviewer. As a knowledgable consumer
I don't waste my time listening to stuff that is obviously inferior as
the is the case of the WAVAC.

There must be some mag
somewhere that will publish such a review by you.
I don't even think T$$ will do that. Try Peter Axcel.

Nope tehy listen also, but then I doubt very seriously that manufacturers
who aren't confident that their gear is going to sound like it should,
would ever let them have a review sample.

Thanks for admiting that you are totally unqualified as a reviewer.
I can't do worse than Fremer.

wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...


Because that would be foolish for a reviewer. As a knowledgable
consumer I don't waste my time listening to stuff that is obviously
inferior as the is the case of the WAVAC.

There must be some mag
somewhere that will publish such a review by you.
I don't even think T$$ will do that. Try Peter Axcel.

Nope tehy listen also, but then I doubt very seriously that
manufacturers who aren't confident that their gear is going to sound
like it should, would ever let them have a review sample.

Thanks for admiting that you are totally unqualified as a reviewer.
I can't do worse than Fremer.

You could do even worse than Ferstler.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...


Because that would be foolish for a reviewer. As a knowledgable
consumer I don't waste my time listening to stuff that is obviously
inferior as the is the case of the WAVAC.

There must be some mag
somewhere that will publish such a review by you.
I don't even think T$$ will do that. Try Peter Axcel.

Nope tehy listen also, but then I doubt very seriously that
manufacturers who aren't confident that their gear is going to sound
like it should, would ever let them have a review sample.

Thanks for admiting that you are totally unqualified as a reviewer.
I can't do worse than Fremer.

You could do even worse than Ferstler.
I doubt it, I know more about audio than he does,and if didn't know it, I
wouldn't pretend. How many times did he corrected by Arny and other people
who did know more than he did?

wrote in message
k.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...


Because that would be foolish for a reviewer. As a knowledgable
consumer I don't waste my time listening to stuff that is obviously
inferior as the is the case of the WAVAC.

There must be some mag
somewhere that will publish such a review by you.
I don't even think T$$ will do that. Try Peter Axcel.

Nope tehy listen also, but then I doubt very seriously that
manufacturers who aren't confident that their gear is going to sound
like it should, would ever let them have a review sample.

Thanks for admiting that you are totally unqualified as a reviewer.
I can't do worse than Fremer.

You could do even worse than Ferstler.
I doubt it, I know more about audio than he does,and if didn't know it, I
wouldn't pretend. How many times did he corrected by Arny and other
people who did know more than he did?


He 'retired'.You can take his place.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
k.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...


Because that would be foolish for a reviewer. As a knowledgable
consumer I don't waste my time listening to stuff that is obviously
inferior as the is the case of the WAVAC.

There must be some mag
somewhere that will publish such a review by you.
I don't even think T$$ will do that. Try Peter Axcel.

Nope tehy listen also, but then I doubt very seriously that
manufacturers who aren't confident that their gear is going to sound
like it should, would ever let them have a review sample.

Thanks for admiting that you are totally unqualified as a reviewer.
I can't do worse than Fremer.

You could do even worse than Ferstler.
I doubt it, I know more about audio than he does,and if didn't know it, I
wouldn't pretend. How many times did he corrected by Arny and other
people who did know more than he did?


He 'retired'.You can take his place.
And work for Atkinson? I don't think so.

said:


You could do even worse than Ferstler.


I doubt it, I know more about audio than he does,and if didn't know it, I
wouldn't pretend. How many times did he corrected by Arny and other
people who did know more than he did?


He 'retired'.You can take his place.


And work for Atkinson? I don't think so.


Ferstler worked for Atkinson? That's news to me.

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
...
said:


You could do even worse than Ferstler.


I doubt it, I know more about audio than he does,and if didn't know it,
I
wouldn't pretend. How many times did he corrected by Arny and other
people who did know more than he did?


He 'retired'.You can take his place.


And work for Atkinson? I don't think so.


Ferstler worked for Atkinson? That's news to me.

--

Aw ****, I thought he was talking about Fremer. He should retire.

wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
k.net...

..


You could do even worse than Ferstler.
I doubt it, I know more about audio than he does,and if didn't know it,
I wouldn't pretend. How many times did he corrected by Arny and other
people who did know more than he did?


He 'retired'.You can take his place.
And work for Atkinson? I don't think so.

Since when did Howie work for JA?