Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy" wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting theory. There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a plan to kill Hilary Clinton. It's just a rumor. It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named McKelvy. Boon Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage the Dean campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea. Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well. If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just have to take your word for it. Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this isn't important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it bothers you or anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want to. Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with about ten different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as they come. Now deny it like a good boy. Boon Dear Mr. Bug: You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know that better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as if it were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your sick ride. Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently you never use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion. Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever concedes. Is that right? How about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to your opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air? No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason whatsoever. That makes perfect sense. Boon |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
McKelvy said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy" wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting theory. There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a plan to kill Hilary Clinton. It's just a rumor. It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named McKelvy. Boon Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage the Dean campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea. Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well. If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just have to take your word for it. Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this isn't important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it bothers you or anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want to. Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with about ten different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as they come. Now deny it like a good boy. Boon Dear Mr. Bug: You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know that better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as if it were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your sick ride. Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently you never use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion. Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever concedes. Is that right? How about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to your opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air? No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason whatsoever. I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it. I asked you if you even looked at it, and you lied and said you did, and you got caught when you slipped up on a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation. Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Boon |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy" wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting theory. There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a plan to kill Hilary Clinton. It's just a rumor. It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named McKelvy. Boon Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage the Dean campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea. Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well. If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just have to take your word for it. Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this isn't important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it bothers you or anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want to. Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with about ten different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as they come. Now deny it like a good boy. Boon Dear Mr. Bug: You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know that better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as if it were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your sick ride. Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently you never use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion. Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever concedes. Is that right? How about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to your opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air? No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason whatsoever. I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it. That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown person's unsubstantiated OPINION. You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they won't think you're the smarmy little slug that you are. I asked you if you even looked at it, and you lied and said you did, There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember it from when it first happened. and you got caught when you slipped up on a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation. The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like. Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. OSAF. You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Then we have that in common, then? Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Boon Bring it on meat. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
McKelvy said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy" wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting theory. There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a plan to kill Hilary Clinton. It's just a rumor. It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named McKelvy. Boon Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage the Dean campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea. Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well. If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just have to take your word for it. Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this isn't important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it bothers you or anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want to. Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with about ten different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as they come. Now deny it like a good boy. Boon Dear Mr. Bug: You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know that better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as if it were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your sick ride. Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently you never use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion. Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever concedes. Is that right? How about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to your opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air? No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason whatsoever. I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it. That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown person's unsubstantiated OPINION. No, I didn't, dumbass. Thanks for proving you lied again. You didn't read anything. You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they won't think you're the smarmy little slug that you are. I don't desperately want you to think anything. I don't care what you think. I and almost everyone else here receive great joy from watching clueless, ignorant people like you and Arny try to compete with the big boys, and fail miserably. I asked you if you even looked at it, and you lied and said you did, There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember it from when it first happened. Then why did you make that huge whopper of a mistake, then? and you got caught when you slipped up on a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation. The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like. That's your fantasy. Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE. No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your ass. You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and Arny are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars, and you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments. No wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your behavior has to be your worst nightmare. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. OSAF. Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone here sees you as you apparently see yourself? Why do people call you a bug eater? Why do they call you stupid? Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just hopelessly misunderstood? Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life? You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Then we have that in common, then? Another IKYABWAI. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Boon Bring it on meat. Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because you're a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the liberals hate about conservatives. Why do you think I can get along with liberals like George and Jim? Because I don't walk around saying idiotic things about my politics. Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. You are entertainment here. You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I JUST DON'T GET IT. Boon |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your ass. Translation: If you are part of my clique, you get a free pass. You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and Arny are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars, and you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments. Remember, the perpetrator of this run-on brags about his great writing skills. No wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your behavior has to be your worst nightmare. Given that Richman sees nothing wrong with your reprehensible behavior Phillips, his opinions are easy to dismiss. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. OSAF. Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone here sees you as you apparently see yourself? If irony killed. Why do people call you a bug eater? Because they look up to one of the biggest numskulls in the history of Usenet, George Middius. Why do they call you stupid? Because it's what they do. It makes them feel smart. Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Because they look up to one of the biggest numskulls in the history of Usenet, George Middius. Are you just hopelessly misunderstood? Not at all. He's understood as being a threat. Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life? We leave that sort of self-delusional behavior to people like you, Phillips. Mike and I are just a couple of guys among the few who see through your shtick and aren't afraid to speak up against you. You've turned RAO into something like a bad high school angst movie because that's a mental level that you can comprehend. You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Then we have that in common, then? Another IKYABWAI. If irony killed... It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say. No Phillips, it just means that most of your ranting is so childish that it doesn't deserve much creative thought. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Bring it on meat. Bring what on? Why Phillips, we want to see this great terror that you and Zelniker are threatening this place with. I'm trying to help you. First help yourself, Phillips. For openers, try responding to people at some social level more advanced than high school. You need to give it up, because you're a waste of bandwidth. If irony killed. When is the last time you made an audio post around here, Phillips? I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the liberals hate about conservatives. Phillips, since you admit that you've got some kind of offline relationship with Sanders, why don't you show us how you can help him stop acting like the National Lampoon's version of a liberal? Oh yes, and since you claim to be self-aware why don't you show us that you can cure yourself of behaving like the captain of my old high school's girl's cheerleading team? Why do you think I can get along with liberals like George and Jim? Phillips, the reason why would be desperation. Most of us have social lives, but sucking up to these losers is about as close as you can get. Because I don't walk around saying idiotic things about my politics. If irony killed. Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. If irony killed. You are entertainment here. If irony killed. You are stress relief. If irony killed. You are a punching bag. If irony killed. You are a joke. If irony killed. You are duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? Think of RAO as a pet store. Not all pets are completely benign. Ever wonder why anybody keeps a rattlesnake for a pet? If you could answer that question, you'd understand what people like you and Middius mean to me. I JUST DON'T GET IT. If only you were self-aware, Phillips. Boon |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() If irony killed. If irony killed... If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If redundancy killed. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"S888Wheel" wrote in message
If redundancy killed. You'd be dead! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
S888Wheel a écrit :
If irony killed. If irony killed... If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If irony killed. If redundancy killed. Watching to your previous exchange with me and with GeoSync we must confess that you are on a good way to compete... (lol) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy" wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting theory. There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a plan to kill Hilary Clinton. It's just a rumor. It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named McKelvy. Boon Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage the Dean campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea. Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well. If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just have to take your word for it. Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this isn't important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it bothers you or anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want to. Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with about ten different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as they come. Now deny it like a good boy. Boon Dear Mr. Bug: You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know that better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as if it were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your sick ride. Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently you never use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion. Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever concedes. Is that right? How about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to your opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air? No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason whatsoever. I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it. That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown person's unsubstantiated OPINION. No, I didn't, dumbass. Thanks for proving you lied again. You didn't read anything. Who the **** is Leon North? You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they won't think you're the smarmy little slug that you are. I don't desperately want you to think anything. I don't care what you think. I and almost everyone else here receive great joy from watching clueless, ignorant people like you and Arny try to compete with the big boys, and fail miserably. But at least we have you to kick around. I asked you if you even looked at it, and you lied and said you did, There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember it from when it first happened. Then why did you make that huge whopper of a mistake, then? Leon North is not anybody that anybody even knows for sure exists. You're taking his word. and you got caught when you slipped up on a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation. The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like. That's your fantasy. Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE. No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your ass. Oooooh, I 'm so scared. You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and Arny are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars, and you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments. We may be punching bags, but it for clueless, no life havin', gotta attack somebody to make me feel better, assholes like you. Hardly counts for anything in the real world. No wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your behavior has to be your worst nightmare. I despise him because he's an unprofessional lying SOB. He doesn't know me and hasn't gotten anything right about me ever. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. OSAF. Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone here sees you as you apparently see yourself? Do you think there's anyone here whose opinion I care that much about? Why do people call you a bug eater? Because it makes them feel better to be able to denigrate somebody that disagrees with them by pretending their less than human. Why do they call you stupid? Because they are. Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just hopelessly misunderstood? See above. I think to a certain degree I am misunderstood, but partly that's by choice. Nobody here "knows" me or anyone else here. Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life? None of the above. I'm just a guy who thinks for himself and some people don't like it. They're entitled. I don't lose any sleep over it. You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Then we have that in common, then? Another IKYABWAI. No, it's a appropriate response to the pot calling the kettle black. You come here, apparently for one reason and that's to be a rude asshole. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say. It's atestament to YOUR stupidity that you don't see you ARE everything you accuse me of. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Boon Bring it on meat. Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because you're a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the liberals hate about conservatives. I'm not a conservative. Why do you think I can get along with liberals like George and Jim? Because they are ****heads too. Because I don't walk around saying idiotic things about my politics. And? Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. OSAF You are entertainment here. You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I JUST DON'T GET IT. Boon I get you. You're a liar. **** off. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
McKelvy said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy" wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting theory. There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a plan to kill Hilary Clinton. It's just a rumor. It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named McKelvy. Boon Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage the Dean campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea. Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well. If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just have to take your word for it. Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this isn't important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it bothers you or anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want to. Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with about ten different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as they come. Now deny it like a good boy. Boon Dear Mr. Bug: You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know that better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as if it were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your sick ride. Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently you never use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion. Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever concedes. Is that right? How about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to your opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air? No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason whatsoever. I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it. That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown person's unsubstantiated OPINION. No, I didn't, dumbass. Thanks for proving you lied again. You didn't read anything. Who the **** is Leon North? You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they won't think you're the smarmy little slug that you are. I don't desperately want you to think anything. I don't care what you think. I and almost everyone else here receive great joy from watching clueless, ignorant people like you and Arny try to compete with the big boys, and fail miserably. But at least we have you to kick around. I asked you if you even looked at it, and you lied and said you did, There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember it from when it first happened. Then why did you make that huge whopper of a mistake, then? Leon North is not anybody that anybody even knows for sure exists. You're taking his word. and you got caught when you slipped up on a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation. The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like. That's your fantasy. Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE. No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your ass. Oooooh, I 'm so scared. You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and Arny are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars, and you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments. We may be punching bags, but it for clueless, no life havin', gotta attack somebody to make me feel better, assholes like you. Hardly counts for anything in the real world. No wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your behavior has to be your worst nightmare. I despise him because he's an unprofessional lying SOB. He doesn't know me and hasn't gotten anything right about me ever. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. OSAF. Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone here sees you as you apparently see yourself? Do you think there's anyone here whose opinion I care that much about? Why do people call you a bug eater? Because it makes them feel better to be able to denigrate somebody that disagrees with them by pretending their less than human. Why do they call you stupid? Because they are. Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just hopelessly misunderstood? See above. I think to a certain degree I am misunderstood, but partly that's by choice. Nobody here "knows" me or anyone else here. Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life? None of the above. I'm just a guy who thinks for himself and some people don't like it. They're entitled. I don't lose any sleep over it. You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Then we have that in common, then? Another IKYABWAI. No, it's a appropriate response to the pot calling the kettle black. You come here, apparently for one reason and that's to be a rude asshole. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say. It's atestament to YOUR stupidity that you don't see you ARE everything you accuse me of. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Boon Bring it on meat. Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because you're a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the liberals hate about conservatives. I'm not a conservative. Why do you think I can get along with liberals like George and Jim? Because they are ****heads too. Because I don't walk around saying idiotic things about my politics. And? Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. OSAF You are entertainment here. You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I JUST DON'T GET IT. Boon I get you. You're a liar. **** off. What a big baby you are. Boon |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc Phillips" wrote What a big baby you are. Boon Once again, pot, meet kettle. Are you done now? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Booniebug (I just think that's so cutesy)Sez:
Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE. No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your ass. You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and Arny are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars, and you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments. No wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your behavior has to be your worst nightmare. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. OSAF. Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone here sees you as you apparently see yourself? Why do people call you a bug eater? Why do they call you stupid? Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just hopelessly misunderstood? Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life? You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Then we have that in common, then? Another IKYABWAI. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Boon Bring it on meat. Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because you're a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the liberals hate about conservatives. Why do you think I can get along with liberals like George and Jim? Because I don't walk around saying idiotic things about my politics. Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. You are entertainment here. You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I JUST DON'T GET IT. Boon I'm sorry you don't get the fact that I'm not intimidated by you. I'm sorry you feel so threatened by my being here even though you think I'm not smart enough. Mostly though, I'm confused at why you and your buddies feel so compelled to use me as punching bag, when you claim I'm not really a worthy opponent. Because if all that's true, what does it say it about YOU? I think I smell a contradiction. Of course it could be you're just lying. Again. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
McKelvy said:
Booniebug (I just think that's so cutesy)Sez: Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE. No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your ass. You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and Arny are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars, and you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments. No wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your behavior has to be your worst nightmare. Everyone gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. OSAF. Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone here sees you as you apparently see yourself? Why do people call you a bug eater? Why do they call you stupid? Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just hopelessly misunderstood? Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life? You are the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so they can watch the game. Then we have that in common, then? Another IKYABWAI. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot every night. Boon Bring it on meat. Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because you're a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the liberals hate about conservatives. Why do you think I can get along with liberals like George and Jim? Because I don't walk around saying idiotic things about my politics. Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. You are entertainment here. You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I JUST DON'T GET IT. Boon I'm sorry you don't get the fact that I'm not intimidated by you. I'm sorry you feel so threatened by my being here even though you think I'm not smart enough. Mostly though, I'm confused at why you and your buddies feel so compelled to use me as punching bag, when you claim I'm not really a worthy opponent. Because if all that's true, what does it say it about YOU? I think I smell a contradiction. Of course it could be you're just lying. Again. Isn't this the second time you've responded to this post? Is your life really this empty? Boon |