On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 03:28:02 GMT, "Sandman"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:45:03 GMT, "Sandman"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:22:40 GMT, "Sandman"
wrote:

Dean's likely two sweep all 50 states, the way Bush is going down the
tubes
on all fronts, and there won't be any need for "recounts" this time.

You *really* don't believe this, do you? If so, then you're just as
crazy as the Republicans who have Bush already elected.

I believe it's possible, because I'm excited about Dean's campaign. Am I
going to make a prediction? Only that Dean will be our next President.

Here's some insight as to why:

Taegan Goddard over at Political Wire-- one of the very best one-stop
political blogs out there-- argues that the 2004 election is going to be
very close. As Goddard says of Republican daydreams of a rout, "It's very
hard to pull off a landslide when you're not likely to win three of the
five
largest states."

This is a far cry from a "likely sweep of all 50 states".

So what's wrong with a tad of hyperbole when expressing your enthusiasm? :-)

It gives ammo to your opponents.

Nothing wrong with unbridled enthusiam when tempered with reality
though...g