Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi, I have a 1000+ audio tapes and I would like to convert them all into CD format. I have been using the usual method of a "line-in" from tape deck onto my PC sound card, and then burning it. However the process is cumbersome and takes way too long because I have to stop after every track/song etc. I came across this product from Tascam. Has anyone heard about it? Is it worth the price? More importantly, are there any drawbacks to converting from a tape to CD in this manner? The product is called Cassette and CD recorder Tascam CC 222 and costs around $799 http://www.audiogear.com/cgi-bin/sho...&preadd=action Any feedback appreciated Thanks Ketan |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ketan wrote:
Hi, I have a 1000+ audio tapes and I would like to convert them all into CD format. I have been using the usual method of a "line-in" from tape deck onto my PC sound card, and then burning it. However the process is cumbersome and takes way too long because I have to stop after every track/song etc. I came across this product from Tascam. Has anyone heard about it? Is it worth the price? More importantly, are there any drawbacks to converting from a tape to CD in this manner? The product is called Cassette and CD recorder Tascam CC 222 and costs around $799 http://www.audiogear.com/cgi-bin/sho...&preadd=action Rather pricey, though for 1000+ tapes it might be worth it. But I don't see anything in the features table that detects track start/stops on tape, so how does this help you? Why not just digitize and entire side of an audio tape (or an entire tape) using your current setup and then split the big .wav fil up into indvidual tracks later? It's easy to do with most audio file editing software. Some will even locate track start/stop automatically though you may have to tweak that function so it doesn't place a track mark at a silence *inside* a track. -- -S |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ketan writes:
Hi, I have a 1000+ audio tapes and I would like to convert them all into CD format. I have been using the usual method of a "line-in" from tape deck onto my PC sound card, and then burning it. However the process is cumbersome and takes way too long because I have to stop after every track/song etc. If there are pauses between the tracks/songs, then you can eeasily record the whole tape to one file, and then let some sutiable software to split it to parts. One sofware I have used for this has beeb CDwave from http://www.milosoftware.com/cdwave/ Just let the tapes play, record them to files. Then just split them and burn them CD as you want. -- Tomi Engdahl (http://www.iki.fi/then/) Take a look at my electronics web links and documents at http://www.epanorama.net/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ketan" wrote in message
Hi, I have a 1000+ audio tapes and I would like to convert them all into CD format. I have been using the usual method of a "line-in" from tape deck onto my PC sound card, and then burning it. However the process is cumbersome and takes way too long because I have to stop after every track/song etc. I came across this product from Tascam. Has anyone heard about it? Is it worth the price? More importantly, are there any drawbacks to converting from a tape to CD in this manner? The product is called Cassette and CD recorder Tascam CC 222 and costs around $799 http://www.audiogear.com/cgi-bin/sho...&preadd=action I suspect this device works fairly well, all things considered. Since you have a cassette machine, you can save yourself quite a bit of money by just getting a stand-alone CD recorder, which will work about as well with your existing tape player. While they are getting to be like hen's teeth, consumer CD recorders run around 1/3 the price, and so-called professional CD recorders run about 2/3 the price. The bottom line is that you have to accept some slop if you go with automatic conversion from tape to CD. Because of the noise between tracks on a cassette tape, automatic splitting of tapes into into CD tracks is flakey. Because of the varying levels that cassettes are recorded at, levels on the resulting CDs will wander around. It's really all about sound quality and how much of you that you want to put into getting it. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message http://www.audiogear.com/cgi-bin/sho...&preadd=action I suspect this device works fairly well, all things considered. Since you have a cassette machine, you can save yourself quite a bit of money by just getting a stand-alone CD recorder, which will work about as well with your existing tape player. That device probably does the job excellently for you in your circumstances, with minimal user input required. Or you could scour the bargain bins and used CD shops, and replace the tapes with real CDs. Start with the titles you have an immediate hankering to hear. geoff PS I have a similar 'problem' with thousands of 35mm transparencies to transcribe to CD-ROm and paper. Unfortunately I have to do it the hard way, although I'm sure slide scanner/tweaker/printer product is nearly affordable in the near future. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff Wood wrote:
PS I have a similar 'problem' with thousands of 35mm transparencies to transcribe to CD-ROm and paper. Unfortunately I have to do it the hard way, although I'm sure slide scanner/tweaker/printer product is nearly affordable in the near future. Depends on what you call nearly affordable. I picked up a Nikon slide scanner a while ago. It was a few hundred bucks. -- Pat |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Farrell" wrote in message news:VeD1f.25901$GO4.6841@lakeread04... Geoff Wood wrote: PS I have a similar 'problem' with thousands of 35mm transparencies to transcribe to CD-ROm and paper. Unfortunately I have to do it the hard way, although I'm sure slide scanner/tweaker/printer product is nearly affordable in the near future. Depends on what you call nearly affordable. I picked up a Nikon slide scanner a while ago. It was a few hundred bucks. I got a PrimeFilm one. I was thinking more like the 'all-in-one' paradigm we are talking about here. Like the photo-printers you now stick and ram-stick (or whatever) in to print photos directly, without piddling around with scannercomputerphoto manip-softprinter. Save that process for the critical ones that warrant the special attention. geoff |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven Sullivan" wrote in message ... Ketan wrote: Hi, I have a 1000+ audio tapes and I would like to convert them all into CD format. I have been using the usual method of a "line-in" from tape deck onto my PC sound card, and then burning it. However the process is cumbersome and takes way too long because I have to stop after every track/song etc. I came across this product from Tascam. Has anyone heard about it? Is it worth the price? More importantly, are there any drawbacks to converting from a tape to CD in this manner? The product is called Cassette and CD recorder Tascam CC 222 and costs around $799 http://www.audiogear.com/cgi-bin/sho...&preadd=action Rather pricey, though for 1000+ tapes it might be worth it. But I don't see anything in the features table that detects track start/stops on tape, so how does this help you? Why not just digitize and entire side of an audio tape (or an entire tape) using your current setup and then split the big .wav fil up into indvidual tracks later? It's easy to do with most audio file editing software. Some will even locate track start/stop automatically though you may have to tweak that function so it doesn't place a track mark at a silence *inside* a track. That's the way I do it. I use CDWave. It's not free, but it isn't expensive either, and it will divide up the tracks. To make the original recording, I use a program called WaveRepair. It's free. I could, of course, use CDWave to do the recording as well as the track division, but I prefer the look and feel of WaveRepair. I hope you have a separate sound card, such as the Turtle Beach Santa Cruz. Integrated sound cards generally use much of the uP, making it difficult to use the computer while recording. I got nowhere until I bought the Santa Cruz. Norm Strong |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:18:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: While they are getting to be like hen's teeth, consumer CD recorders run around 1/3 the price, and so-called professional CD recorders run about 2/3 the price They're like hens teeth because they're a clunky, overpriced way of doing what your computer would do just as well. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Laurence Payne"
wrote in message On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:18:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: While they are getting to be like hen's teeth, consumer CD recorders run around 1/3 the price, and so-called professional CD recorders run about 2/3 the price They're like hens teeth because they're a clunky, overpriced way of doing what your computer would do just as well. I have free access to both a professional CD recorder and also a goodly number of PCs capable of recording audio and burning CDs. I completely agree that PCs are preferable for almost everything. OTOH, the CD recorder that I use to make "safety" recordings of 75 minute live events has turned out to be invaluable. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff Wood wrote:
"Pat Farrell" wrote in message Depends on what you call nearly affordable. I picked up a Nikon slide scanner a while ago. It was a few hundred bucks. I got a PrimeFilm one. I was thinking more like the 'all-in-one' paradigm we are talking about here. Like the photo-printers you now stick and ram-stick (or whatever) in to print photos directly, without piddling around with scannercomputerphoto manip-softprinter. Save that process for the critical ones that warrant the special attention. There are probably labs that will do the transfer without looking at the results. Since I have 15 or 20 computers laying about my house, I never say any attraction to changing a setup from thing-computer-next-thing to just thing-next-thing. Especially when 'next-thing' can and does change with my mood. Sometimes print, sometimes burn to CD, sometimes resample and put up on a website. Then again, I have a fax machine, a slide scanner, a flatbed scanner, a Laser printer and a ink-jet printer. Mostly because I don't like the all-in-ones. I also prefer amps and tuners to receivers in hi-fi. If I had a bunch of valuable (or priceless) tapes, I'd sure want to put them onto a disk and use CoolEdit or Sonar to tweak them. -- Pat |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Farrell" wrote in message news ![]() If I had a bunch of valuable (or priceless) tapes, I'd sure want to put them onto a disk and use CoolEdit or Sonar to tweak them. Yeah, but would you put th same effort into the priceless ones as the 'average' ones, or the ones you want to keep handy for completeness sake... geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |