| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... " wrote in message link.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... " wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... " wrote in message link.net... http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/reports/1995-04.pdf Just glancing at it this morning, before work; I'm familiar with some of this, but it's not 'signal' measurements for imaging, nor useful for comparing differences in imaging for amplifiers. See, our argument centers around whether amps sound the same, based upon very the rudimentary and simplistic measurements you are using, measurements that do not cover all of the complexities of sound. Are you familiarwith polar plots for measuring dispersion? Imaging is AFAICR the job of speakers, which is why you see it discussed so much more in reviews of speakers. Amps can account for some differences, too Not in imaging, at least none that I can recall. I expect someone who knows otherwise will comment if I am wrong. I'm first in line. And your evidence? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Imaging Help | Car Audio | |||
| Stereo imaging comes from...where? | Tech | |||
| Stereo imaging affecting EQ | Pro Audio | |||
| FA: Canon S-50 Wide Imaging Stereo Loudspeakers (UK only shipping) | Marketplace | |||
| Imaging, soundstage, 3D | High End Audio | |||
Threaded Mode