Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chel van Gennip wrote:
The topic has been here before, but syncing audio and video is an ongoing battle. Recently I made some progress. Normally my targets are piano video's. Piano video's are extremely sensitive for sync problems. I recently replaced my Digital8 camcorder by a JVC Everio GZ-MC500 compact flash camcorder. I just don't like tapes. The output of this camcorder is a mpeg file that is DVD compatible. What is mo when played on a DVD player, the audio and video are in sync. I've had a lot of problems with sync in the conversion to mpeg. Even recordings with the original soudtrack showed drift after about 10 minutes. Those problems seems to be fixed. The soudtrack of a camcorder often is not very usable, so I replace it with a better recording of the event. Currently I am using a minidisk. This week I made a recording of a Beethoven Sonata, about 25 minutes. As the mpeg was in sync, I dumped the audio track of the mpeg file, and used it as a reference track in my DAW. The minidisk file had a drift of about 20ms in this 25 minute recording, so I did not have to make changes. In my DAW it was easy to synchonise the minidisk file with the dumped audiotrack of the camcorder. I added the newly created audiotrack to the mpeg file in Womble's video wizard and muted the original audio track. The video track was not changed. I burned a DVD from this mpeg file and the result was nicely in sync. It was in synch over 25 minutes? I could be wrong, but I think you're just lucky. There are two independent, relatively cheap crystals in play there. If this is not true, then please disregard the rest of this post - I don't know how the minidisk could be synched to the camera. FWIW, I've found the "chase synch" capability of the little Fostex VF-160 class recorders very useful. It's full 16 bit PCM, not ATRACS. It also actually adjusts its speed to match the synch signal - varispeed on an analog tape recorder causes it to shift pitch. It's only good to +/- 5%, but that ougtha be plenty. If the camera will emit SMPTE, you can convert that the MTC. The Fostex will chase that nicely. If it will not emit SMPTE, I'd try two SMPTE-MTC/MTC-SMPTE converters ( like the JLCooper PPS-2 ) . Have one of the synch converters stripe to the audio of the camera, and have the other "wye" cabled to "listen" to this, driving the Fostex. The Fostex takes a couple seconds ( up to five ) to lock, but the clock on the Fostex is correct with the incoming synch stream after that: [pps2] +- [camera input] | +- [pps2] - [Fostex] It'll be a twister game to start things up ![]() it'll be in synch, once you get all the details ironed out. On playback, you'll need one PPS2 to convert the SMPTE leaving the audio track on the camera for the Fostex. -- Les Cargill |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Les Cargill wrote:
It was in synch over 25 minutes? I could be wrong, but I think you're just lucky. There are two independent, relatively cheap crystals in play there. Les, I don't know why you're so surprised. It is very reasonable for two "cheap crystals" to remain in sync for 25 minutes or longer. It doesn't always happen, but it happens often enough to be almost expected. I have been using digital watches for thirty years or so. They contain cheap crystals, and usually are accurate to a minute or less per year. That translates to about 3 milliseconds over half an hour. Considering worst case of opposite drift, they should still be within 6 ms of each other after half an hour. That's close enough for me. I routinely shoot a half-hour concert with two DV cameras and a separate audio recorder. In post, I sync them all up at the start, and check the end. So far, I have never had to make any adjustments for drift. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Anson wrote:
Les Cargill wrote: It was in synch over 25 minutes? I could be wrong, but I think you're just lucky. There are two independent, relatively cheap crystals in play there. Les, I don't know why you're so surprised. It is very reasonable for two "cheap crystals" to remain in sync for 25 minutes or longer. It doesn't always happen, but it happens often enough to be almost expected. I'm not all that surprised. But this is happening by accident, not by design. These clocks aren't that good. I have been using digital watches for thirty years or so. They contain cheap crystals, and usually are accurate to a minute or less per year. That translates to about 3 milliseconds over half an hour. Considering worst case of opposite drift, they should still be within 6 ms of each other after half an hour. That's close enough for me. I'd have to see what you're talking about to know - 6 milliseconds is an eternity in music. Then again, I compensate down to half a millisecond for rendering MIDI tracks. It's relatively easy to do. Then again, I consistently see TV material that's that far off or more. I've even seen movies released on DVD that were way off - the lips and the voice had little to do with each other. They were as much as two frames apart. I routinely shoot a half-hour concert with two DV cameras and a separate audio recorder. In post, I sync them all up at the start, and check the end. So far, I have never had to make any adjustments for drift. That you know of ![]() -- Les Cargill |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chel van Gennip wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:06:12 +0200, Les Cargill wrote: Chel van Gennip wrote: .. This week I made a recording of a Beethoven Sonata, about 25 minutes. As the mpeg was in sync, I dumped the audio track of the mpeg file, and used it as a reference track in my DAW. The minidisk file had a drift of about 20ms in this 25 minute recording, so I did not have to make It was in synch over 25 minutes? I could be wrong, but I think you're just lucky. There are two independent, relatively cheap crystals in play there. If this is not true, then please disregard the rest of this post - I don't know how the minidisk could be synched to the camera. 25 minutes is 1.5e06 ms, crystals with 1e05 accuracy would give less than 20ms drift. That 1.5e06 figure is likely a mean for the spectrum of the device, not a scalar. You could get two standard deviations worse case in typical operation. If it goes to accumulating error, it can add up quickly. Is this likely? I do not know.... Compared with a watch crystal this would mean a watch being off by 25 seconds a month. This seems not to be an extreme specification to me. I found out mpeg is quite sensitive for audio/video frequencies. In DVB forums I read about receivers getting out of sync when tuned on the same station for a long time. So I expect the (1K$, 3CCD) mpeg camcorder will have decent crystals. No, I think you pretty much nailed it - they're mostly 30ish ppm clocks. FWIW, I've found the "chase synch" capability of the little Fostex VF-160 class recorders very useful. It's full 16 bit PCM, not ATRACS. It also actually adjusts its speed to match the synch signal - varispeed on an analog tape recorder causes it to shift pitch. I have more trust in a fixed good clock, than in an adjustable clock. The camcorder does not have a synchonisation signal. I figured. In my DAW I can make small adjustments. With a reference track with good AV sync it is possible to make these adjustments. I found out it is less difficult to align audio to audio in the DAW, than to align video to audio. That would most likely work pretty well, but it's gonna drift now and again. Have you put the minidisk audio in one ear, and the camera audio in another, and listened for the entire program? I dunno - maybe this isn't a problem on a subjective level. I do know that national broadcast program material is *routinely* off by quite a bit. With piano the keystroke rate often is higher than the framerate. That is not what we're after here. The thing being managed is the drift bewteen audio and video. The intervals between keystrokes can be well represented by something as slow as MIDI. It's the gross level drift that can be a problem. In my case, with long (25 minutes or more), shots, at least a good synnchronisation between the video and one (the camcorder) 48khz channel is a good starting point. I am still looking for a good device to replace the minidisk. The M-Audio Microtrack could be a nice replacement. It will do 48khz and 24 bits. That thing sure is cute. And it's *PROFESSIONAL*! ![]() Just doesn't chase synch. I respectfully submit that chasing synch isn't that hard - it's just not considered to be important in this case. I suspect you like it better because it's going to be considerably more convenient. And that is fine. That may be more important in this case. Respectfully, all them hurtz and bitz don't affect the subjective entertainment product consumption experience like things being off synch ![]() But perhaps this ia personal gripe on my part. Bugs hell out of me when things are off synch. -- Les Cargill |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
remeber 6 ms is about the time it takes sound to travel 6 feet.
If you are watching a performance out in the audience, you are easily more than 6 ms off anyway. Mark |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Anson wrote:
I routinely shoot a half-hour concert with two DV cameras and a separate audio recorder. In post, I sync them all up at the start, and check the end. So far, I have never had to make any adjustments for drift. Don't forget that milliseconds are a much smaller deal with sound/pic sync than they are for pure sound recording. What do I mean? In audio 20ms means you get comb filtering -- no laybacks or "bounces" next to other tracks that have any leakage. Since most of us do audio, every millisecond counts. But, as a video editor once pointed out to me, that kind of accuracy is futile when doing sound to picture. Why? Well, let's take video at 30 frames per second. The video is basically taking a still frame once every 33 ms. There's a chance that a video of a snare drum hit might not even capture the very moment the stick hits the head. Instead there will be two pictures -- one just before it hits the head and one just after. (And the stick will probably be a blur in those pictures anyway.) So, a few ms slop one way or the other don't hurt that much. You get away with it in a way you wouldn't if you broke up the aural components. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio |