Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The much-maligned Stereophile makes a big point, well know to it's
readers, about how to useits ratings guidelines only as a tool. And most Stereophile readers in comments written here and elsewhere show they know how to "use" reviewers to align with or run counter to their own perceptions." One of the most oft repeated cliches in "reviews" and elsewhere is that even a small change in the system can make a huge difference in sound. Which means by definition that by this very same criteria any reviewer's opinion is not useful for others to consider because they don't have the exact same system in the same context as was that in the review. This is made even more problematical when it is also oft reported that various bits of swapped gear was used during the review period. "Reviewing" is part of marketing the ethos of the subjective enterprise and the entertainment and self reinforcement value therein. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio |