Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The M-Audio DMP3 touts extended frequency response and numerous other
features at a very low price. Has anyone tried it and how does it engage the human ear? peakester |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't like to make comments about the "sound" of mike preamps for a
variety of reasons, but what I can tell you is that for its price, the DMP3 seems unusually well adapted for use with modern condenser microphones in real-world recording situations. It has high input overload margins (it can handle 2+ Vrms in its low gain setting) and a decent phantom powering circuit (it can support a pair of Schoeps 48 Volt microphones properly at 4.5 mA apiece, which many small portable preamps can't). The output is not only balanced but symmetrical, and the preamp maintains correct signal polarity from input to output. It's the lowest-cost preamp that I would find usable for location recording. What I actually use these days is a Grace Lunatec, but if I had to make do with a DMP3, I think I could. My only qualm is its rather lightweight packaging--I'd want to wrap it carefully before putting it into a backpack or gig bag. Also I've never tried it out in a high-RF environment, and I don't know whether it has a "pin 1 problem" or not. --best regards |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |