Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder how much difference there are between those two Mackie
products which share the newest mic pre. I assume that the FireWire card (for mixer) has all the A/D converters, but I wonder if anyone knows how it differs from the one in 800R. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() TM wrote: I wonder how much difference there are between those two Mackie products which share the newest mic pre. I assume that the FireWire card (for mixer) has all the A/D converters, but I wonder if anyone knows how it differs from the one in 800R. There are many differences. While they share the same basic front end (with the exception of the two channels on the 800R that have variable input impedance), almost everything else is different. They use different converters. There are real A/D converters in the 800R while the Onyx Firewire is a Bridgeco audio chip. The 800R works up to 192 kHz (good for marketing, questionable in practice) and has an assortment of outputs (but not Firewire). The Onyx is limited to 96 kHz and has only Firewire digital outputs. Then there's the fact that the 1640 gives you 16 mic inputs and the 800R has only 8. If you're looking for a studio product, I'd recommend the 800R and work out the interfacing depending on how you work. The Onyx mixer with the Firewire card is a really great way to bring home a multitrack recording of whatever went into the mics when you're doing a live show, but that combination can be somewhat awkward for studio use. You'll **** and moan because in order to use the mixer's EQ for recording you'll have to do some patching, and then you can only get two EQ'd channels going to the computer through the Firewire interface. And to use the mixer's EQ for mixing your tracks, you'll need an interface for your computer that has multiple outputs. The two are as much alike as two watermelons in a patch. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
do you know if the pres sound the same? I guess technically they should be. I need more channels of pre- i have an onyx 1220 and a RNP. I was thinking a focusrite octopre or a mackie 800r but i don't really like the pres in my mackie board. They're kind of nasally. Nate |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Nate Najar wrote: do you know if the pres sound the same? I don't know of any two preamps, even on the same console, that I can tell you sound the same. Suffice it to say that they're both perfectly decent preamps. They both have about the same amount of gain (which, at just barely 60 dB is less than I'd like sometimes) and they don't get noisy when you crank them wide open. I was thinking a focusrite octopre or a mackie 800r but i don't really like the pres in my mackie board. They're kind of nasally. In that case, find a preamp that sounds good with the mics you're using. Hank Alrich gave the Onyx quite a good workout a couple of months back and posted his findings here. He found that with some mics it was flattering, with other mics it was not, which is typical of any mic preamp, particularly a transformerless one. It's really a crapshoot that you have to shoot out yourself. I would think that you could take care of a little "nasally" with a touch of EQ, though on the Onxy mixer, unless you route the input channel to the main or ALT outputs you can't use the channel EQ when you're tracking. But if you're recording in a DAW, you can certainly touch it up. It's no sin to use the tools that you have, provided they're decent tools. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Mackie Onyx | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie Onyx 400F? | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie Onyx 80 Series | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie vlz pro Xdr mic pre vs Onyx mic pre | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie Onyx Opinions? | Pro Audio |