Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Greg Singh wrote:



Bruce J. Richman wrote:


As you've already hesitatingly admitted, you don't know anything about me

and

have never met me. Therefore, you have no idea about what I might or might

not

believe or what I mght or might not buy?

You, on the other hand, as many on RAO have pointed out, have never been

known

to concede that you don't know as much as you think you do about just about

any

topic under discussion. I've never bought any audio product without making
extensive comparisons first. And in answer to your stupid assumption about

my

buying habits, unlike the few suckers that you conned when selling gear,

I'm

not a member of the "component of the month or year" club. I've owned the

same

speakers, amplifier, etc. for a number of years and rarely upgrade pieces

of my

system without a very good reason to do so. And when I *didd* own a pair

of

Quad ESL 57's many years ago, I( certainly didn't buy them because of the
"brand name"; at the time I auditioned them, I knew very little about

either

electrostatics or Quads specifically.

Sorry to shatter yet another of your wildly inaccurate false claims.



Bruce, if you owned ESL57s and "graduated" to Martin Logans then you
went in the wrong direction. ESL57s, withing their operating limits,
are bordering on perfect. Especially if you have some really good
electronics behind them, which, unfortunately, you probably didn't.
Now, I may be wrong and you may have a valid explanation for the reasons
for switching to Martin Logans, but I tend to doubt it. You may also
have had good sounding electronics at one time, but I tend to doubt that
too. You do listen to vinyl, which is certainly a step in the right
direction, but if I remember correctly you listen to it on a VPI, which
tends to produce fairly unexciting, uninvolving sound. But of course
VPI, like Martin Logan, reviews well, so you could see why I would say
that you're merely buying brand names. Moreover, you alluded to the
"research" you do before making a purchase, which presumably has to do
with finding out which brands are reviewed well. You're bitching about
me "not knowing what I'm talking about" is simply a weak defense
mechanism, because you couldn't last five minutes in an audio
conversation with me.










As usual, you're lieing again.


"Lieing"--got it.


About both your knowledge re. audio and about
my reesearch, which you delusionally assume was based on magazine reviews.
Your stupidity re. how others evaluate equipment is duly noted. None of my
research was based on magazine reviews, other than to get a rough idea of what
brands might be worth personally auditioning.


Right, so in your mind if it doesn't show up in a magazine then it isn't
worth auditioning. Exactly as predicted.


95% of my research involved
actual listening comparisons. And of course, your comments about VPI
turntables are not shared by hardly anybody


'Not shared by hardly anybody'--got it.


that has made meaningful
comparisons. Unfortunately, you confuse neutrality and reasonably accurate
playback of what's on the vinyl with the "souped up" "hi-fi" quality of some
English turntables like Linn Sondek, which you probably favor (and probably
sold along with other English brands).


I use live music as a reference, you use magazine terminology. That's
accurate, right?


But thanks for validating my previous
observation that you've been known to bash other brands simply to try and
"sell" your biases to others. As for the electronics I've used, again you're
wrong, but given your biases and inability to concede your own errors in
judgment, why even discuss them?


True, who discusses audio on this group.

Greg Singh wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Greg Singh wrote:



Bruce J. Richman wrote:


As you've already hesitatingly admitted, you don't know anything about me

and

have never met me. Therefore, you have no idea about what I might or
might

not

believe or what I mght or might not buy?

You, on the other hand, as many on RAO have pointed out, have never been

known

to concede that you don't know as much as you think you do about just
about

any

topic under discussion. I've never bought any audio product without
making
extensive comparisons first. And in answer to your stupid assumption
about

my

buying habits, unlike the few suckers that you conned when selling gear,

I'm

not a member of the "component of the month or year" club. I've owned the

same

speakers, amplifier, etc. for a number of years and rarely upgrade pieces

of my

system without a very good reason to do so. And when I *didd* own a pair

of

Quad ESL 57's many years ago, I( certainly didn't buy them because of the
"brand name"; at the time I auditioned them, I knew very little about

either

electrostatics or Quads specifically.

Sorry to shatter yet another of your wildly inaccurate false claims.



Bruce, if you owned ESL57s and "graduated" to Martin Logans then you
went in the wrong direction. ESL57s, withing their operating limits,
are bordering on perfect. Especially if you have some really good
electronics behind them, which, unfortunately, you probably didn't.
Now, I may be wrong and you may have a valid explanation for the reasons
for switching to Martin Logans, but I tend to doubt it. You may also
have had good sounding electronics at one time, but I tend to doubt that
too. You do listen to vinyl, which is certainly a step in the right
direction, but if I remember correctly you listen to it on a VPI, which
tends to produce fairly unexciting, uninvolving sound. But of course
VPI, like Martin Logan, reviews well, so you could see why I would say
that you're merely buying brand names. Moreover, you alluded to the
"research" you do before making a purchase, which presumably has to do
with finding out which brands are reviewed well. You're bitching about
me "not knowing what I'm talking about" is simply a weak defense
mechanism, because you couldn't last five minutes in an audio
conversation with me.










As usual, you're lieing again.


"Lieing"--got it.



Shall we get into further pettiness? Or just leave that to you as you continue
to lose ground?



About both your knowledge re. audio and about
my reesearch, which you delusionally assume was based on magazine reviews.
Your stupidity re. how others evaluate equipment is duly noted. None of my
research was based on magazine reviews, other than to get a rough idea of
what
brands might be worth personally auditioning.


Right, so in your mind if it doesn't show up in a magazine then it isn't
worth auditioning. Exactly as predicted.



Just another lie. Your delusions never end, as evidenced above. Mind-reading
attempts duly noted. Failure to understand other people proven in idiotic
response from failed speaker manufacturer.


95% of my research involved
actual listening comparisons. And of course, your comments about VPI
turntables are not shared by hardly anybody


'Not shared by hardly anybody'--got it.



The usual blather from a failed manufacturer.


that has made meaningful
comparisons. Unfortunately, you confuse neutrality and reasonably accurate
playback of what's on the vinyl with the "souped up" "hi-fi" quality of
some
English turntables like Linn Sondek, which you probably favor (and probably
sold along with other English brands).


I use live music as a reference, you use magazine terminology. That's
accurate, right?



You don't know what your talking about and constantly lie about what others
say, don't you? You can't admit that you don't have the foggiest ideas about
how others form their opinions. You just try and continue with your false
claims about others. Unfortunately for you, nobody believes your phony
pretensiions about music and audio equipment. Apparently, your former employer
also couldn't tolerate your basic dishonesty and inability to treat customers
in a socially acceptable way. Or were there other reasons as well that you
were fired?



But thanks for validating my previous
observation that you've been known to bash other brands simply to try and
"sell" your biases to others. As for the electronics I've used, again
you're
wrong, but given your biases and inability to concede your own errors in
judgment, why even discuss them?


True, who discusses audio on this group.



Not you. That's for sure. Your sole purpose in being here is either to shill
for your speakers or fight with others. Of course, your preference would be to
engage in both obnoxious activities at the same time, correct?



Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Greg Singh wrote:

I use live music as a reference, you use magazine terminology. That's
accurate, right?




You don't know what your talking about and constantly lie about what others
say, don't you? You can't admit that you don't have the foggiest ideas about
how others form their opinions. You just try and continue with your false
claims about others. Unfortunately for you, nobody believes your phony
pretensiions about music and audio equipment. Apparently, your former employer
also couldn't tolerate your basic dishonesty and inability to treat customers
in a socially acceptable way. Or were there other reasons as well that you
were fired?



Bruce, you're in serious denial here. You want to go toe to toe with me
in an audio discussion? You don't have the backbone.

Greg Singh wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Greg Singh wrote:

I use live music as a reference, you use magazine terminology. That's
accurate, right?




You don't know what your talking about and constantly lie about what others
say, don't you? You can't admit that you don't have the foggiest ideas
about
how others form their opinions. You just try and continue with your false
claims about others. Unfortunately for you, nobody believes your phony
pretensiions about music and audio equipment. Apparently, your former
employer
also couldn't tolerate your basic dishonesty and inability to treat
customers
in a socially acceptable way. Or were there other reasons as well that
you
were fired?



Bruce, you're in serious denial here. You want to go toe to toe with me
in an audio discussion? You don't have the backbone.












Inability to answer reasonable question duly noted. Delusional bragging
observed and as always, quite predictable. Singh found to simply be trying out
his latest stolen material from "Lies 'R Us".



Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Greg Singh wrote:



Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Greg Singh wrote:

I use live music as a reference, you use magazine terminology. That's
accurate, right?




You don't know what your talking about and constantly lie about what others
say, don't you? You can't admit that you don't have the foggiest ideas

about

how others form their opinions. You just try and continue with your false
claims about others. Unfortunately for you, nobody believes your phony
pretensiions about music and audio equipment. Apparently, your former

employer

also couldn't tolerate your basic dishonesty and inability to treat

customers

in a socially acceptable way. Or were there other reasons as well that

you

were fired?



Bruce, you're in serious denial here. You want to go toe to toe with me
in an audio discussion? You don't have the backbone.













Inability to answer reasonable question duly noted. Delusional bragging
observed and as always, quite predictable. Singh found to simply be trying out
his latest stolen material from "Lies 'R Us".


Let me know when you work up the nerve to discuss something audio related.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not you. That's for sure. Your sole purpose in being here is either
to shill for your speakers or fight with others.

That would be plural - purposes.

Of course, your
preference would be to engage in both obnoxious activities at the
same time, correct?

This differs from you how, Bruce?

Oh yes Bruce, you don't make anything audio to shill.

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not you. That's for sure. Your sole purpose in being here is either
to shill for your speakers or fight with others.

That would be plural - purposes.

Of course, your
preference would be to engage in both obnoxious activities at the
same time, correct?

This differs from you how, Bruce?


Since you have been proven over and over again to be RAO's most widely despised
and hated poster for your lengthy history of character assassination, lyiing
about others, and smearing any and all who disagree with you, your question is
worthless, Arny. Your hypocrisy in defense of Singh simply validates all the
scorn you've richly earned over the years on RAO.





Oh yes Bruce, you don't make anything audio to shill.






I've never claimed to be an audio manufacturer. You, on the other hand, have
constantly tried to spread your anti-preference, anti-subjective opinion
bull**** on RAO by making false claims about your agenda-driven website
dedicated to nothing more than the denial of individual differences in
selection oif audio equipment.

Why don't you and Greg get a room, Arny? You two obviously have a lot in
common - e.g. narcissistic posting, constant lying about what others think and
do, and of course, shameless attempts to promote your self-serving propaganda
about audio, music, and products that very few people want.




Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not you. That's for sure. Your sole purpose in being here is
either to shill for your speakers or fight with others.

That would be plural - purposes.

Of course, your
preference would be to engage in both obnoxious activities at the
same time, correct?

This differs from you how, Bruce?

Bruce gives us his 463rd rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
a crap-slinging contest:

Since you have been proven over and over again to be RAO's most
widely despised and hated poster for your lengthy history of
character assassination, lyiing about others, and smearing any and
all who disagree with you, your question is worthless, Arny. Your
hypocrisy in defense of Singh simply validates all the scorn you've
richly earned over the years on RAO.

Oh yes Bruce, you don't make anything audio to shill.

I've never claimed to be an audio manufacturer.

Doncha think this is a rather defensive response to a simple statement of
fact, Bruce?

You, on the other
hand, have constantly tried to spread your anti-preference,
anti-subjective opinion bull**** on RAO by making false claims about
your agenda-driven website dedicated to nothing more than the denial
of individual differences in selection oif audio equipment.

Bruce gives us his 464th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

Why don't you and Greg get a room, Arny? You two obviously have a
lot in common - e.g. narcissistic posting, constant lying about what
others think and do, and of course, shameless attempts to promote
your self-serving propaganda about audio, music, and products that
very few people want.

Bruce gives us his 465th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:22:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

You, on the other
hand, have constantly tried to spread your anti-preference,
anti-subjective opinion bull**** on RAO by making false claims about
your agenda-driven website dedicated to nothing more than the denial
of individual differences in selection oif audio equipment.

Bruce gives us his 464th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

Why don't you and Greg get a room, Arny? You two obviously have a
lot in common - e.g. narcissistic posting, constant lying about what
others think and do, and of course, shameless attempts to promote
your self-serving propaganda about audio, music, and products that
very few people want.

Bruce gives us his 465th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

What's the last colon for, Arnold?

Dave Weil wrote:


On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:22:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

You, on the other
hand, have constantly tried to spread your anti-preference,
anti-subjective opinion bull**** on RAO by making false claims about
your agenda-driven website dedicated to nothing more than the denial
of individual differences in selection oif audio equipment.

Bruce gives us his 464th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

Why don't you and Greg get a room, Arny? You two obviously have a
lot in common - e.g. narcissistic posting, constant lying about what
others think and do, and of course, shameless attempts to promote
your self-serving propaganda about audio, music, and products that
very few people want.

Bruce gives us his 465th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

What's the last colon for, Arnold?







Krueger likes to use cut-and-paste methodology to more efficiently repeat his
lies on RAO. Actually whenever one of his lies occurs, usually within a few
lines of another person's posts, the term "high colonic" seems appropriate.



Bruce J. Richman

dave said:

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:22:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

You, on the other
hand, have constantly tried to spread your anti-preference,
anti-subjective opinion bull**** on RAO by making false claims about
your agenda-driven website dedicated to nothing more than the denial
of individual differences in selection oif audio equipment.

Bruce gives us his 464th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

Why don't you and Greg get a room, Arny? You two obviously have a
lot in common - e.g. narcissistic posting, constant lying about what
others think and do, and of course, shameless attempts to promote
your self-serving propaganda about audio, music, and products that
very few people want.

Bruce gives us his 465th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

What's the last colon for, Arnold?

He had to go potty.

Boon

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:22:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Bruce gives us his 465th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to
start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

What's the last colon for, Arnold?

When he is extra ****ty, he needs extra colons.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not you. That's for sure. Your sole purpose in being here is
either to shill for your speakers or fight with others.

That would be plural - purposes.

Of course, your
preference would be to engage in both obnoxious activities at the
same time, correct?

This differs from you how, Bruce?

Bruce gives us his 463rd rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
a crap-slinging contest:


Kruger is once again lying and making things up, as is his custom. He asked
his insulting question, which is in itself a lie, simply to try and generate
flames in a discussion in which he was not previously involved. This is
typical Krueger behavior, i.e. interject insulting comments or questions in a
conversation not previously involving him.



Since you have been proven over and over again to be RAO's most
widely despised and hated poster for your lengthy history of
character assassination, lyiing about others, and smearing any and
all who disagree with you, your question is worthless, Arny. Your
hypocrisy in defense of Singh simply validates all the scorn you've
richly earned over the years on RAO.


Krueger's inability to refute the above factual claim duly noted



Oh yes Bruce, you don't make anything audio to shill.

I've never claimed to be an audio manufacturer.

Doncha think this is a rather defensive response to a simple statement of
fact, Bruce?


No, Arny. But your delusional interpretation makes you appear even more
foolish than usual, doesn't it?



You, on the other
hand, have constantly tried to spread your anti-preference,
anti-subjective opinion bull**** on RAO by making false claims about
your agenda-driven website dedicated to nothing more than the denial
of individual differences in selection oif audio equipment.

Bruce gives us his 464th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:


Just another answer of Arny's deceptive cut-and-paste repetitions of prevfious
lies.

The so-called "querstion" to which Krueger was referring was asked with no
answer either anticipated or wanted. Like his friend and ally, Singh, Krueger
asks questions only to perpetuate his usual personal insults in a different
grammatical form. It's typical of his transpareent dissemblikng, but fools
nobody.




Why don't you and Greg get a room, Arny? You two obviously have a
lot in common - e.g. narcissistic posting, constant lying about what
others think and do, and of course, shameless attempts to promote
your self-serving propaganda about audio, music, and products that
very few people want.


Krueger refuses to answer the question of why he and Greg don't get a room so
that they can better share their common pathological views and practices.
Instead, all he can offer his another cut-and-paste repetition of his usual
bull****.



Bruce gives us his 465th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:










Quite predictable compulsive lying as a repetitive substitute for either
truthful or original thought by Krueger duly noted.

LOL!



Bruce J. Richman

Arny Krueger wrote in message :

Bruce gives us his 463rd rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
a crap-slinging contest:

Bruce gives us his 464th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

Bruce gives us his 465th rendition of "Look over there, cake!" IOW Bruce
doesn't answer the question that was put to him, but instead tries to start
yet another crap-slinging contest:

Arny, please stop saying the same thing over and over. I get dizzy reading your
posts.



Arny is My Kroo-Daddy