Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
lcw999 wrote:
As one looks down a bit further in this newsgroup, one will find a inordinate amount of bitterness toward a magazine, its purpose and it editor....but, not much about "Audio"...wonder why? Because the magazine has a lot what many people find to be scam content. After all, this is a hobby...where did all the bitter people come from? Once you see that the Stereophile's figurative emporer often has no clothes, its fun to take hits on it. Must they think in alignment with some non-achiever...who, has for a decade filled this newsgroup with a form of no-think fodder? That would be of course, George Middius and his happy band of nincumpoops. Who rejects the very mental processes that we have been given to enjoy music and the whole audio process? Here's a challenge for you LCW. Find George Middius and his happy band of nincumpoops actually posting about audio process. In fact their posts are nearly 100% personal attacks. In doing so, he has not provided a viable substitute for process that has evolved over millions of years and provided us all with musical enjoyment. True, there aren't a lot of insights about audio that can be dervied from intentional misspellings of other people's names, effeminate nicknames, and full frontal attacks on other people's political and religious views. But that is what Goerge and his crew inflict on this place day after day. No one really thought anyone would..this is a bone of contention here. You obviously have a lack of historical and contextual perspective, LCW. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
enhancing early reflections? | Pro Audio | |||
Creating Dimension In Mixing- PDF available on Request (112 pages0 | Pro Audio | |||
Stereophile Tries To Come Clean About The DiAural Fiasco | Audio Opinions | |||
Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed | Tech | |||
Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed | Pro Audio |