Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
RickH
 
Posts: n/a
Default



dave weil wrote:
options to fill your need. Obviously, you don't have any use for a
review-type magazine, which is cool.


I do read the ranting letters to the editor in it though. I think any
magazine that even mentions a tube is a good thing because it will
create a demand for quality current-production tubes, as NOS wont last
forever. Stereophile just needs to dedicate at least one article a
month to the amateurs (in the classic definition), and not just
consumers in the form of all subjective reviews.

  #2   Report Post  
dave weil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 17 Jun 2005 09:03:38 -0700, "RickH"
wrote:



dave weil wrote:
options to fill your need. Obviously, you don't have any use for a
review-type magazine, which is cool.


I do read the ranting letters to the editor in it though. I think any
magazine that even mentions a tube is a good thing because it will
create a demand for quality current-production tubes, as NOS wont last
forever. Stereophile just needs to dedicate at least one article a
month to the amateurs (in the classic definition), and not just
consumers in the form of all subjective reviews.


That isn't a bad idea. It's probably harder to find good topics for
such an article than in the old days though.
  #3   Report Post  
Iain M Churches
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"RickH" wrote in message
oups.com...


dave weil wrote:
options to fill your need. Obviously, you don't have any use for a
review-type magazine, which is cool.


I do read the ranting letters to the editor in it though. I think any
magazine that even mentions a tube is a good thing because it will
create a demand for quality current-production tubes, as NOS wont last
forever. Stereophile just needs to dedicate at least one article a
month to the amateurs (in the classic definition), and not just
consumers in the form of all subjective reviews.


Now we are getting the-)

Iain


  #4   Report Post  
Sander deWaal
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"RickH" said:


I do read the ranting letters to the editor in it though. I think any
magazine that even mentions a tube is a good thing because it will
create a demand for quality current-production tubes, as NOS wont last
forever. Stereophile just needs to dedicate at least one article a
month to the amateurs (in the classic definition), and not just
consumers in the form of all subjective reviews.



The market for tubes will shrink, and the largest chunk of them will
be sold to guitar players.

That means that only mainstream tubes like EL83, EL34, ECC83 et al
will continue to be made.

Until DSP takes it all over.........

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The problem with Stereophile, in a nutshell [email protected] Pro Audio 183 May 6th 06 10:14 PM
Some Recording Techniques kevindoylemusic Pro Audio 19 February 16th 05 07:54 PM
CLC: More John Stewart Vacuum Tubes 12 November 2nd 04 09:47 AM
Does anyone know of this challenge? [email protected] High End Audio 453 June 28th 04 03:43 AM
Note to the Idiot George M. Middius Audio Opinions 222 January 8th 04 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"