Eddie continues to demonstrate how much he doesn't get it:

I've proven he's a nutball many times. How much more do you need?


The only thing you've proven is that it requires someone to open up
your skull and spoon knowledge into your empty cranium, before you even
get a ****ing clue.


Your standard of proof is very low.



My standard of proof is very low? Ok, where is that whackjob hiding
out
right now. Oh where is he?


And YOU, I've proven that you are also. Do you doubt this?

That you're an idiot and a nutball? No, I don't doubt it.



I'll remember what you said you POS.

I have a hard time believing you can remember where the bathroom is. I
have an even harder time giving a **** about your constant name
calling, followed by your pathetic indignation at being dished some
back at you.

Before you descend further into senselessness, I'm admitting
you don't know what you're babbling about with regards to the issue
raised by the OP.

That's not an admission. That's your worthless ****ing opinion.

See my earlier comment about you as a nutball.

Yet another worthless opinion, from someone who went through hundreds
(IIRC) of posts on the issue of level matching.

PD posted a question.
I responded to that question with a logical response on the issue of
listener training.
You then say I'm evasive?
Clearly, you have no idea what evasive means.
You don't seem to have a clear idea on the subject being discussed.
You seem to be participating in this thread for the sole purpose of
personal attacks.
If that's what you want, I'll engage you as long as I find it amusing.
If you wish to actually discuss the topic without the insults and
personal attacks, I'm fine with that as well.

You decide.

wrote
Eddie continues to demonstrate how much he doesn't get it:



snip the rest of McKelvy's wahhhhh



PD posted a question.

PD posted only one question. And that question was:


"... could it be that it[Listener Training] has a detrimental and/or
*subversive* effect on your overall listening skills and/or patterns
of listening behaviour?"



I responded to that question with a logical response on the issue of
listener training.


You lying pos. Your behavior and responses provided the proof to
prove the point on the question PD raise. Though I don't think that
the training will necessarily make it increasingly difficult to listen
naturally and holistically again to music, you and the other sublime
nutballs like Fertsler provide ample proof tha it can.


Your initial and subsequent responses concerns the difficulty faced
by experienced listener to enjoy music when listening to inferior
system who then, becomes a better listener after exposure to
exceptional system -- support the notion that most folks don't turn
into a punctiliously nitpicking nutball like yourself about proof and
the rigor involve in quantifying and isolating the amount of sonic
difference between audio component. That is indeed for subversive
Whackjobs to do.


You then say I'm evasive?

Do I have to point this out to you?

Clearly, you have no idea what evasive means.
You don't seem to have a clear idea on the subject being discussed.
You seem to be participating in this thread for the sole purpose of
personal attacks.
If that's what you want, I'll engage you as long as I find it amusing.
If you wish to actually discuss the topic without the insults and
personal attacks, I'm fine with that as well.

You decide.

Look, I'm not here to argue with you. I'm here to find out for the month
of June which from the Hives is a leading contender for the all-important
Nutball of the Month award. Fair enough ?