Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ty,
I've done everything on their website, twice. I can't say that they are particularly helpful with any of this. More like they are negligent. I think it would be reasonable to expect a clear listing of things to do, but for the most part it's a bunch of hints and tips that might work. I've already reinstalled Windows, protools and everything else trying to get this thing to work. Paul |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm at work now, so not able to test this out, but from some
conversations on the DUC it seems like my problem might be using a USB 2.0 hard drive. I think (hope) that it might be interfering with the MBOX. This would explain a lot. Actually I would really prefer to just use my C drive to record on. I know it is not ideal, but that would be a lot more portable and I have minimal plug in and track count needs. If that worked and I could back up and archive to the external drive I would be fine. here's to hoping. I wish I hadn't installed SP2 last night in a fit of desperation, but we shall see what happens. I still think that support could be a lot better. I've had more trouble with Digidesign stuff than anything else I've ever used. Actually, it's the ONLY stuff that ever gives me any trouble, other than an Epson scanner that I returned. Thanks Paul |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message... Actually I would really prefer to just use my C drive to record on. I recommend not using your system drive to record on. Throw a partition on there and dedicate the new part to your recording. here's to hoping. I wish I hadn't installed SP2 last night in a fit of desperation, but we shall see what happens. In a fit of desperation? After two people responded that SP 2 had caused them problems? Odd. I still think that support could be a lot better. I've had more trouble with Digidesign stuff than anything else I've ever used. I've heard support is questionable. Actually, it's the ONLY stuff that ever gives me any trouble, other than an Epson scanner that I returned. Then why didn't you return the M-Box a year ago when it didn't work? DM |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:51:34 -0400, wrote
(in article .com): I'm at work now, so not able to test this out, but from some conversations on the DUC it seems like my problem might be using a USB 2.0 hard drive. I think (hope) that it might be interfering with the MBOX. This would explain a lot. Actually I would really prefer to just use my C drive to record on. I know it is not ideal, but that would be a lot more portable and I have minimal plug in and track count needs. If that worked and I could back up and archive to the external drive I would be fine. here's to hoping. I wish I hadn't installed SP2 last night in a fit of desperation, but we shall see what happens. I still think that support could be a lot better. I've had more trouble with Digidesign stuff than anything else I've ever used. Actually, it's the ONLY stuff that ever gives me any trouble, other than an Epson scanner that I returned. Thanks Paul Whoa! I'm NOT a PC guy, but in Mac land, the deal is you put the program on your system drive and the audio media (sessions) on another preferrably internal 5400 rpm minimum, (7200 rpm better) drive. I don't know that digi supports USB 2. Anybody? Regards, Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message... I've been telling some virus-related stories here lately and I just discovered this morning that I can't run the update to Zone Alarm. It just won't run at all. I'm beginning to suspect that something is still messed up in Windows (though I haven't resorted to a re-install) perhaps related to a temporary directory that can't be found. But the lack of error messages makes troubleshooting difficult. Is this your Win98SE box ?? DM |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message news:znr1118712585k@trad... In article nNore.12570$gL4.12061@trnddc07 writes: related to a temporary directory that can't be found. But the lack of error messages makes troubleshooting difficult. Is this your Win98SE box ?? Nope, on the Win2000 day-to-day computer. I fixed the temporary directory path problem today by changing the environment setting to something else, then changing it back to what it should be. I'm guessing that this got changed in the registry. I wonder what else got changed, and how long it will take me to find it. In my 98SE systems, I use the System File Checker constantly. I had some issues with the Microsoft security patches from March... Security Update for Windows 98 (KB888113) and Security Update for Windows 98 (KB891711) seemed to cause scripting errors when surfing the web. Turns out that something happened to both my IE preferences and to the manner in which Zone Alarm looked at web sites. I can't be real specific, most of this is a wee bit over my head. Anyway, Zone Alarm expired at the end of March, and the stupid web site refused to accept the passwords I had set up for upgrading over the web, so I just went out and bought the newest version. This new version has become bloated and invasive, something that I used to praise ZA of *not* being. Even though I was upset that it was writing things into boot reminders (DOS), I decided to go ahead with the available on-line upgrade. It doubled those entries and added even more BS that is totally unecessary... anti-virus monitoring ?!?!? Holy smoke... now Zone Alarm is trying to tell me how to run my PC. The actions that some of the settings used to take had totally changed, and using my old settings, Zone Alarm was blocking even the most simple little animated .gifs from fully loading. Finally, after much wasted time, I managed to get stable surfing back in place. Well... along come two more Microsoft updates in May.... Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (KB890923), and *another* copy of Security Update for Windows 98 (KB891711). The latter of which installed itself in two different locations and if you disable it in startup, or uninstall one copy (which is all that shows up in add/remove), then the other copy, written into the boot, kicks in. On the first re-boot after this, the blue screen of death greeted me with great anger. Before it was over, windows was refusing to boot in any manner other than 'safe' mode. I have no idea what the cause of this was, but it's a symptom that apparently hundreds of people have shared. I don't even know what I did to finally restore my system, and it was a couple of hours in a solid state of shock and panic before I was seeing signs of the system coming back to life and it would boot without going in safe mode. Disabling Zone Alarm allowed me to start resetting things like my screen resolution and other items that were affected. Restarting with ZA let me reset it's security configurations slowly but surely until everything seemed to return to what appreared to be normal. My best assumption, is that the last few security updates were more than meets the eye. Both Microsoft and Zone Alarm had some odd interpretations of security implementation, and they were in *serious* conflict with one another. As the days have passed, problems have again begun to rear their heads with me changing nothing. Once again, ZA is not allowing simple .gifs and a great deal of scripting to load from web pages. I've checked my setting over and over again, and nothing is different from what I've done for the past three years *except* these recent so-called security patches and the new version of Zone Alarm. Once I have everything backed up and can go to storage for my mother- board drivers and a couple of pieces of software, I'm reloading Windows for the first time in over 4 years... and I am going back to Version 3 of Zone Alarm, and I do not plan on installing any updates from Microsoft that were released after December of 2004. Call me paranoid or delusional, but these patches seem to me to be compromising security rather than fixing it. Zone Alarm no longer reports to me when my IP address changes, and a few other little anomalies that don't make any sense. Lo and behold, today there are two more security patches for Win98... I just have the oddest feeling that these are opening doors rather than closing them. I hope the same upgrade & patch path is available and the individual patches haven't been written into something cumulative. I'd really like my computer to work again with the settings for security that I have chosen in the past, without my web browser being more or less compromised by these "fixes". DM |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message news:znr1118712585k@trad... In article nNore.12570$gL4.12061@trnddc07 writes: related to a temporary directory that can't be found. But the lack of error messages makes troubleshooting difficult. Is this your Win98SE box ?? Nope, on the Win2000 day-to-day computer. I fixed the temporary directory path problem today by changing the environment setting to something else, then changing it back to what it should be. By the way... the reason that this was on my mind, was that a friend just brough me his old Win98 PC which crashed on his after these latest updates from Microsoft, and he was using the freeware version of ZoneAlarm.... no frills at all. So, I get to bring back to life another PC that I'm very familiar with, over the next couple of days. I'll let you know if I find anything obvious. DM |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"You do the best you can, and when you decide that you've wasted enough
time on it, you cut your losses and try something else. There's always a market for your M-Box on eBay. " You know, I thought I had figured it out tonight, and then I realize that no, nothing is going to make this thing work. You are right. It will be on Ebay by the end of the week. Good riddens. I don't want to think about the amount of time I've wasted on this piece of garbaggio. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message... You know, I thought I had figured it out tonight, and then I realize that no, nothing is going to make this thing work. For the life of me, I can't imagine why you've had this box for over a year with no results and not returned it to your dealer or had the product's customer support solve your problem long ago. I don't want to think about the amount of time I've wasted on this piece of garbaggio. You should actually be thinking long and hard about why you are just now posting about this and that you waited so long to do anything that might actually get you some results. -- David Morgan (MAMS) http://www.m-a-m-s DOT com Morgan Audio Media Service Dallas, Texas (214) 662-9901 _______________________________________ http://www.artisan-recordingstudio.com |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
Because I was pretty sure that I would get it to work, and then moved 4 times in the interim. It was the low end of my priority scale, although I certainly wished I had figured it out earlier. It's not my usual, but I really did want success with this thing and still can't figure out how and why it won't work. Anyway, I'm just glad I figured it out. Paul |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... David, Because I was pretty sure that I would get it to work, and then moved 4 times in the interim. It was the low end of my priority scale, although I certainly wished I had figured it out earlier. It's not my usual, but I really did want success with this thing and still can't figure out how and why it won't work. Anyway, I'm just glad I figured it out. Paul Sorry to be such a pain, Paul... I guess you can tell that I'm the kind of guy that would have pitched a helluva' bitch or got my money refunded right away. g Moving a lot is a bitch, I've been there... so is bum gear. I told the story here, back in spring of 2004, about the line of people at the local guitar center shortly after christmas, who were all returning M-Boxes. It was a real fiasco back then. I would have hoped that more of the bugs could have been worked out by now. DM |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Frustrated with latency: which piece of gear is the culprit? | Pro Audio | |||
Frustrated with latency: which piece of gear is the culprit? | Pro Audio | |||
Frustrated! | Pro Audio | |||
Delta 1010 LT - nightmare .... yes , another frustrated user.....! | Pro Audio |