In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

Actually, assuming
that you have jobs, you need to stop horsing around on RAO
and get back to work.

That's odd. You posted when you were still working. Is this the usual
Howard double-standard?

I retired years ago (seven, actually), but continued to do
sub work for the library up until about two years ago. They
were lucky to have me (remember, they hired me part time to
help out and not the other way around) and I could have
spent 3/4 of my time duking it out with you nitwits and the
library would still have been happy to have me on hand.

In any case, my point was that you guys seem ready to
respond to my post on almost a moment's notice, which tells
me that many of you sit at your desks all day long and
desperately try to make connections with fellow freakos.
Some of you also get a self-esteem boost from duking it out
with audio-writer notables.

I don't 'duke it out' with JA.

You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.

Are you disappointed not to make a connection?

Stephen

On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 04:20:06 GMT, MINe 109
wrote:

You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.

Maybe I should have waited until after I see Cheap Trick on Wed. to
answer this one.

dave weil wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 04:20:06 GMT, MINe 109
wrote:


You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.


Maybe I should have waited until after I see Cheap Trick on Wed. to
answer this one.

My options for Wednesday evening are Robert Fripp at The Fillmore or the
Giants vs Kansas Cityat SBC Park.

I'm inclined towards the ball game, since Fripper's probably won't play
21st Century...

In article ,
Schizoid Man wrote:

dave weil wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 04:20:06 GMT, MINe 109
wrote:


You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.


Maybe I should have waited until after I see Cheap Trick on Wed. to
answer this one.

My options for Wednesday evening are Robert Fripp at The Fillmore or the
Giants vs Kansas Cityat SBC Park.

I'm inclined towards the ball game, since Fripper's probably won't play
21st Century...

The Giants are terrible this year, but the ballpark's said to be cool.

I don't know what a Fripp solo show is like, but I doubt that playing
hits for fans is high on his list.

Stephen

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.

I'll bet you fidgeted continuously as you counted every
minute.

Howard Ferstler

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.

I'll bet you fidgeted continuously as you counted every
minute.

No, I read the time from the header and calculated the approximate
duration.

See you tomorrow,

Stephen

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.

I'll bet you fidgeted continuously as you counted every
minute.

No, I read the time from the header and calculated the approximate
duration.

See you tomorrow,

Stephen

Don't bet on it. Interesting that this time you answered my
post in about 20 minutes.

Get a life.

Howard Ferstler

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...

Don't bet on it. Interesting that this time you answered my
post in about 20 minutes.

Get a life.



And you responded back in 15 minutes.
Haw,haw, haw!!



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...

Don't bet on it. Interesting that this time you answered my
post in about 20 minutes.

Get a life.


And you responded back in 15 minutes.
Haw,haw, haw!!

Sure. I drop in every few days and scope for about an hour,
or maybe a bit longer. Obviously, then, I would be in a
position to answer messages that appeared during that
period.

However, I then drop out for several days (this message
comes three days after yours) and do something productive.

On the other hand, virtually every time I drop in and post I
see responses to my messages that come within minutes. This
always seems to be the case, and I have to conclude that you
guys must have toilets built into your computer chairs.

You are always here, ready to respond at an instant.

Howard Ferstler

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...


You are always here, ready to respond at an instant.


2 hours, 30 minutes, to be exact



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

You really SHOULD try to get out more.

Haw, haw. Took six hours to see this one.

I'll bet you fidgeted continuously as you counted every
minute.

No, I read the time from the header and calculated the approximate
duration.

See you tomorrow,

Don't bet on it. Interesting that this time you answered my
post in about 20 minutes.

Get a life.

Sorry, I don't bother worrying how long I should wait before answering a
post. This afternoon, I checked my messages and found yours was there
and had been for twenty minutes, taking your word for it.

I came home from work just now, and here's your message, seven hours old.

Work was fun, BTW, and involved earplugs.

Stephen

MINe 109 wrote:

Sorry, I don't bother worrying how long I should wait before answering a
post. This afternoon, I checked my messages and found yours was there
and had been for twenty minutes, taking your word for it.

I came home from work just now, and here's your message, seven hours old.

Work was fun, BTW, and involved earplugs.

My take on this is that you either operate a jackhammer or
work at a shooting range. Good thing you have those
earplugs.

Howard Ferstler

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

Sorry, I don't bother worrying how long I should wait before answering a
post. This afternoon, I checked my messages and found yours was there
and had been for twenty minutes, taking your word for it.

I came home from work just now, and here's your message, seven hours old.

Work was fun, BTW, and involved earplugs.

My take on this is that you either operate a jackhammer or
work at a shooting range. Good thing you have those
earplugs.

No, and no. Yes, I need those earplugs: the work environment peaks at
102 dB.

Stephen