Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message news ![]() "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "EddieM" wrote in message . .. What is really wrong with sighted evaluation ? Nothing, depending on the situation. The problem with sighted listening is that when the differences are small, it can be very unreliable. Taken by itself, that's a very reasonable statement. The apparent disagreement is that you believe that far more components fall into the class of "small differences" than I do. "Jenn" agrees with me that, depending upon the individual, this class varies. That's easy to resolve. No harm is done if you treat a larger difference like it was a smaller difference. The worst that can happen is that the small difference-oriented test gives an outstandingly strong positive result for differences. The harm comes when, in response to my statement that I despise the sound of QSC amps, which is actually my specific position with respect to those amps, you attempt to disqualify my comment from consideration. Not really, "Arny is a bad Scientist" Robert. Your statement disqualifies itself. Obviously, it is based on your hatred and pent-up desire to attack me and try to destroy my credibility any way you can. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vinyl is Still the Best Listening Medium? | Pro Audio | |||
Sub Amps - a Follow up Question | Tech | |||
enhancing early reflections? | Pro Audio | |||
James Randi: "Wire is not wire. I accept that." | Audio Opinions | |||
Yet another DBT post | High End Audio |