Thinking of Jamie Benchimol and pathologicla behavior, a search of goggle
shows that he called me a "pedophile" on RAO more than 100 times. Wouldn't
it be ironic if the same little sociopath were behind the aliases
"S888wheel" and "Jamie Benchimol"?






Paranoid delusions of conspiracies noted. Of course you know my name and
address and telephone number (thankyou for not using it). I don't know who
Jamie Benchimol is. I have never ever called anyone a pedophile.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

Thinking of Jamie Benchimol and pathologicla behavior, a search of
goggle shows that he called me a "pedophile" on RAO more than 100
times. Wouldn't it be ironic if the same little sociopath were
behind the aliases "S888wheel" and "Jamie Benchimol"?

Paranoid delusions of conspiracies noted. Of course you know my name
and address and telephone number (thankyou for not using it).

Far be it from me to use the naive revelations of a fool against him.

I don't know who Jamie Benchimol is. I have never ever called anyone a
pedophile.

Frankly sockpuppet wheel, I've lost track of your false and unprivileged
publications which have exposed a number of persons to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, or which caused him to be shunned or avoided, or which
had a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

Arny Krueger wrote:

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


Thinking of Jamie Benchimol and pathologicla behavior, a search of
goggle shows that he called me a "pedophile" on RAO more than 100
times. Wouldn't it be ironic if the same little sociopath were
behind the aliases "S888wheel" and "Jamie Benchimol"?


Paranoid delusions of conspiracies noted. Of course you know my name
and address and telephone number (thankyou for not using it).


Far be it from me to use the naive revelations of a fool against him.


I don't know who Jamie Benchimol is. I have never ever called anyone a

pedophile.

Frankly sockpuppet wheel, I've lost track of your false and unprivileged
publications which have exposed a number of persons to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, or which caused him to be shunned or avoided, or which
had a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.



Yes I am, I can prove it.

Lionel wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


Thinking of Jamie Benchimol and pathologicla behavior, a search of
goggle shows that he called me a "pedophile" on RAO more than 100
times. Wouldn't it be ironic if the same little sociopath were
behind the aliases "S888wheel" and "Jamie Benchimol"?



Paranoid delusions of conspiracies noted. Of course you know my name
and address and telephone number (thankyou for not using it).



Far be it from me to use the naive revelations of a fool against him.


I don't know who Jamie Benchimol is. I have never ever called anyone a


pedophile.

Frankly sockpuppet wheel, I've lost track of your false and unprivileged
publications which have exposed a number of persons to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, or which caused him to be shunned or avoided, or
which
had a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.



Yes I am, I can prove it.

Ooops this one wasn't complete...

I can prove the judge that S888Wheel has insulted my family.
I can also prove to the judge that S888Wheel has also played piano on
me, or perhaps I should say "with me" I can't remember because it wasn't
really painful. ;-)

I can prove the judge that S888Wheel has insulted my family.
I can also prove to the judge that S888Wheel has also played piano on
me, or perhaps I should say "with me" I can't remember because it wasn't
really painful. ;-)

You have proven your father raised a fool.

S888Wheel wrote:


You have proven your father raised a fool.

Raises hand

I have a question.

If you are suing someone for defamatory remarks posted to
Usenet, then why on earth do you continue to engage the
target of your lawsuit in conversation?

Nexus 6

Nexus 6 wrote:



S888Wheel wrote:


You have proven your father raised a fool.


Raises hand

I have a question.

If you are suing someone for defamatory remarks posted to Usenet, then
why on earth do you continue to engage the target of your lawsuit in
conversation?

Nexus 6


action stopped

Interesting question...

action

Nexus 6 asked of Scott Wheeler in message
news:IUolb.2191$d87.1743@okepread05...
If you are suing someone for defamatory remarks posted to
Usenet, then why on earth do you continue to engage the
target of your lawsuit in conversation?

A good question. As is the one that needs to be addressed to Arny
Krueger: once a lawsuit had been filed against him for libel, why
did he repeat the libel on r.a.o.?

Good to see you back Nexus.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

If you are suing someone for defamatory remarks posted to
Usenet, then why on earth do you continue to engage the
target of your lawsuit in conversation?

Fair question. I am trying to counter Arny's propaganda regarding this lawsuit
with the facts.

S888Wheel wrote:

I can prove the judge that S888Wheel has insulted my family.
I can also prove to the judge that S888Wheel has also played piano on
me, or perhaps I should say "with me" I can't remember because it wasn't
really painful. ;-)


You have proven your father raised a fool.

How is the audience rating today ? Is your wife proud of you ?
I like this analogy, your are like Gregory Singh you are looking for new
customers, Singh for his crappy speakers, you for your crappy story...
You are both swindlers. ;O)

Frankly sockpuppet wheel, I've lost track of your false and unprivileged
publications which have exposed a number of persons to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, or which caused him to be shunned or avoided, or which
had a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.





Nothing to loose track of. I haven't made any.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

Frankly sockpuppet wheel, I've lost track of your false and
unprivileged publications which have exposed a number of persons to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which caused him to be
shunned or avoided, or which had a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

Nothing to loose track of. I haven't made any.

Nor have I. How long is it going to take you to figure out that the name of
this newsgoup includes the word "opinion"?

Arny said

Frankly sockpuppet wheel, I've lost track of your false and
unprivileged publications which have exposed a number of persons to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which caused him to be
shunned or avoided, or which had a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

I said


Nothing to loose track of. I haven't made any.


Arny said


Nor have I. How long is it going to take you to figure out that the name of
this newsgoup includes the word "opinion"?

I have already tried to explain the legal difference between an opinion and a
libelous false accusation but you have failed to undestand simple concepts on
the subject. I am not responsible for your comprehension problems.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

Arny said

Frankly sockpuppet wheel, I've lost track of your false and
unprivileged publications which have exposed a number of persons to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which caused him to be
shunned or avoided, or which had a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

I said


Nothing to loose track of. I haven't made any.


Arny said


Nor have I. How long is it going to take you to figure out that the
name of this newsgoup includes the word "opinion"?

I have already tried to explain the legal difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accusation but you have failed to
undestand simple concepts on the subject.

I find it ironic that you're very quilty of the formal definition of libel
that Middius posted, sockpuppet wheel.

I am not responsible for your comprehension problems.

I'm not responsible for your stupidity.

S888Wheel wrote:
Thinking of Jamie Benchimol and pathologicla behavior, a search of goggle
shows that he called me a "pedophile" on RAO more than 100 times. Wouldn't
it be ironic if the same little sociopath were behind the aliases
"S888wheel" and "Jamie Benchimol"?







Paranoid delusions of conspiracies noted. Of course you know my name and
address and telephone number (thankyou for not using it).

I don't know how I have been able to miss this one :
"*(thankyou for not using it)*" ! LOL !
The analogy with Singh and his chronic masochist behaviour is too much
interesting.
This is the perfect illustration of the story of the sadist and the
masochist :
The masochist says "Please, hurt me..."
The saddist answers "No !"


I don't know who
Jamie Benchimol is. I have never ever called anyone a pedophile.