Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Steve Puntolillo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ampex 3761 Mixer / Stax / Tom Dowd?

Hi --

I have an Ampex 3761 mixer for auction on ebay. A fellow from the
Netherlands who has been studying the Stax recordings saw the auction and
contacted me. Here's what he said:

Hi Steve,

I have just seen your Ebay auction of Ampex model 3761 and I
was thrilled to see your pictures!

Anyway, my name is ... and I live in the Netherlands.

For many years now I am doing research in the recording
equipment that Stax Records in Memphis used to use.

The mixers were always a question mark : was it model 3761 or
MX35? Not untill recently I found out that it was model 3761.

Coincidently last Wednesday I spoke with Steve Cropper who
was a recording engineer at Stax (and also the guitarist of
Booker T and the MG's) about the mixers. Two 3761 were
coupled to have 8 inputs and one output to drive Ampex model
350 or 351 (mono). I still don't know how they wired the two 3761's.

When Stax started the first stereo recordings Tom Dowd of
Atlantic Records wired the mixers to a Scully 280/2 in order
to have one 3761 for each channel!!

...

*********************

Can anyone verify any of this info?

Thanks,

-- Steve

=================================================
Sonicraft A2DX Lab
Ultimate Multitrack Analog-to-Digital Transfers
http://www.sonicraft.com/a2dx
=================================================



  #2   Report Post  
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Steve Puntolillo wrote:

When Stax started the first stereo recordings Tom Dowd of
Atlantic Records wired the mixers to a Scully 280/2 in order
to have one 3761 for each channel!!


Can anyone verify any of this info?


Not at all, but that sort of thing wasn't unusual back in that era. I
remember seeing one later studio with a Shure M67 on each channel of their
440B-4.

Folks would take those things and tag the outputs together with summing
resistors to chain a bunch of them in parallel. They'd chain inputs
together to make matrix mixers as front ends for early multitrack work.

You'd see the junky Ampex mixers (and often folks would replace the horrible
Beyer input transformers, but not always), and the Altec rackmount PA mixers
a lot. Later on the Shure stuff. I don't think I saw any studio desperate
enough to use Bogen or Newcomb front ends. But back then, there wasn't
any other real alternative other than a custom console which took a lot
of time and money.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: RARE Ampex 3761 Tube Mic Preamp / Mixer - MINT! Steve Puntolillo Pro Audio 0 May 1st 05 03:52 AM
LAST DAY! FA: AMPEX PARTS - SOME NOS Steve Puntolillo Pro Audio 0 January 5th 05 08:30 PM
"Tom Dowd and the language of Music" News Daughter Dowd Pro Audio 5 May 12th 04 04:26 PM
Regarding: 6 speakers 1 powered mixer Tom Deflumere Pro Audio 0 April 2nd 04 06:23 AM
Mixing/Summing in DAW or Digital Mixer for best quality? (long) Synth80s Pro Audio 6 March 3rd 04 11:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"