| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"SSJVCmag" wrote in message ... "loopy" wrote: Would it be better to record at 24/96 and mixdown to 44.1 16 bit or to keep the math simple and record at 88.2. TIA -------LB I'm still stuck in the mud with, If you;re not workign with top-drawer stuff, Keep IT Simple: Digital Release format determines working format... 88 goes to 44 96 goes to 48 Only place 96 makes sense if thatıs the decisaion tree is for TV/film stuff with a 48k track format What the hecks the diff between 88 and 96 anyway? It's 8k 'better'. ;-) -- John L Rice |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| sound file resampling | Pro Audio | |||
| sound file resampling | Tech | |||
| sound file resampling | Audio Opinions | |||
| 88.2 or 96 ? | Pro Audio | |||
Hybrid Mode
