This Message is Crosspost-Free for your
Sanitization, Protection & Reading Enjoyment!

On 4/19/05 7:54 PM, in article ,
"Apostle Keith Williams" wrote:

No, stopping someone from posting to the internet is like stopping
him from sending circulars by the US Postal Service.

Oh hell I HATE this stupid comment...
IT COSTS THE SENDER PER_PIECE TO SEND STUFF USPS.

Only way this'll fix is for it to cost-per-message to send stuff net.
Pay-for-Bandwidth-Used.
Somehow there's a way to make that work...
Vigilante retaliation groups?
"knock knock...":


"If you get mail
you don't want, you can throw it out;

Again Mr.Diversion, It costs the SENDER to use the USPS.


it's unconstitutional to deny
him freedom of religion, speech, and press.

NONE of these have ANYTHING to do with spamming the inet.


We can sue people
for taking away our Constitutional rights in the internet.

Ummm.. Hello? I missed that ammendment...
(maybe it was part of the Patriot-or-Else Act?)


The internet
is electronic mail, and the Constitution gives everyone the right to send
mail without limiting us, for if you limit a right, it is no longer a right,
but a privilege. Using the internet is a right.

Wow.. I though he couldn't top the opening statement!
Amazing.
Folks with this sort of self-centered delusion really need to get a clue,
get out more and READ more. A real edumakation is a thing of beauty, a joy
to behold and without it we're not fully human.
Sigh... Here we go.
RIGHTS are NOT "stuff we'd like to have for free just cuz".
Rights are the practical embodiment of a set of moral choices of a
community. If they are not codified and enforced, they don't exist.
As to the internet, like EVERYTHING in life (rights and their defense
included)
TANSTAAFL.

Hell I just should've posted the acronym and let Dear Reader actually fire a
few neurons.