Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
just to relate a recent experience doing a piano and flute duo
performing classical material. the piano is a 7'4" bosendorfer in the pianist's living room, so i had to track it on site. i used a spaced pair of DPA 4011s just outside the curve. the flute was recorded in my studio using a spaced pair of DPA 4006s and an ORTF pair of AKG c481s. all through millennia media HV3 pres. i started by mixing the piano as a hard LR panned image, which gives you the 50' wide piano effect, low end on the left and high on the right, with a slight hole in the middle for the flute. i reversed the reverb returns to give some high end on the left and some bottom on the right. i gave the piano a slight smile EQ to also make a place for the flute to sit. i rahter tightly panned the flute tracks at maybe 10:30-1:30 or so. the whole thing sounded mushy to me, flute wasnt localized enough, and the piano sounded ridiculous to me spread out so far (even though most of the piano/XXX duo CDs i have display this kind of wide panning for the piano). i tried everything i knew with various stereo effects reducing the panned piano image to a more naroow space (which made it conflict with the flute, of course), blah, blah, etc. finally, i got so frustrated, i pulled all the faders down except for one of the piano mics, and one of the flute mics, gave them each a bit of a nice stereo reverb, panned the flute just left of center, and the piano just roght of center, and BINGO - all of a sudden the whole mix took on a new life - both instruments have a defined place in the stereo image, while the stereo reverb gives a natrual sounding width to both instruments. i guess i relay all this because in the past, i have never even considered micing a piano in mono, and virtually always have tracked solo instruments like flutes in stereo. duh, duh, and duh... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- jnorman sunridge studios salem, oregon |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:51:38 -0500, Todd Lipcon
wrote: Next time you might try micing the piano from a little farther off for classical recording. Especially on a big instrument like a grand Bosendorfer, the sound needs a little bit of space to spread/mix acoustically before you get the mics on it. Assuming the room is good and not noisy, you might like the stereo image more if you mic from 6+ feet away. Right. Went to a live vs. recorded demo at Bosendorfer in Manhattan last week and they used a closely-spaced pair of omnis. The reproduced sound was just as muffled and congested as was the live since I was seated less than 6 feet from the piano. When I returned to the room from getting a glass of water, the sound of the piano at 15-20' was vastly superior. Kal |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... just to relate a recent experience doing a piano and flute duo performing classical material. the piano is a 7'4" bosendorfer in the pianist's living room, so i had to track it on site. i used a spaced pair of DPA 4011s just outside the curve. the flute was recorded in my studio using a spaced pair of DPA 4006s and an ORTF pair of AKG c481s. all through millennia media HV3 pres. i started by mixing the piano as a hard LR panned image, which gives you the 50' wide piano effect, So why not pan the L and R tracks to give the stereo width of the piano a narrower focus ? geoff |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
[...] i guess i relay all this because in the past, i have never even considered micing a piano in mono, and virtually always have tracked solo instruments like flutes in stereo. This past week we had Pat Metheny on one of our shows with a bass player. After some noodling around with various stereo setups, Don (the mixer) decided that the best sound was both instruments mono dead centre with a little stereo 'verb. -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi jnorman
If you like I could send you a PDF on recording grand piano. It is based on my experience working with Oscar Peterson and Glenn Gould. I also have mp3's I could send kevin doyle |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chel van Gennip wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:22:23 +0100, Kalman Rubinson wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:51:38 -0500, Todd Lipcon wrote: Next time you might try micing the piano from a little farther off for classical recording. Especially on a big instrument like a grand Bosendorfer, the sound needs a little bit of space to spread/mix acoustically before you get the mics on it. Assuming the room is good and not noisy, you might like the stereo image more if you mic from 6+ feet away. Right. Went to a live vs. recorded demo at Bosendorfer in Manhattan last week and they used a closely-spaced pair of omnis. The reproduced sound was just as muffled and congested as was the live since I was seated less than 6 feet from the piano. When I returned to the room from getting a glass of water, the sound of the piano at 15-20' was vastly superior. The lid on a piano suggests the sound comes from the top of the piano. A lot of the sound comes from the bottom. So for a piano you should keep some distance, and a reflecting floor, so the sound can blend a little. The OP says the recording location was the pianist's living room. There you have a dilema. Most living rooms have acoustics you want to avoid, this results in rather close miking. If you want a good stereo recording of a piano, keep your distance and you can use a AB setup. If you must go closer, you better go to a XY setup and try some pan to get the stereo image as good as possible. Close miking with a AB setup combined with pan will give strange side effects. I'm curious. The soundtrack from Antwone Fisher, featuring music by Mychael Danna, has several wonderful songs with piano leads. I love the imaging in these recordings. I feel as if my ears are inside the piano. How were those done? CD |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
maybe with the mics inside the piano? but who listens with their head
in there anyway? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Codifus wrote:
I'm curious. The soundtrack from Antwone Fisher, featuring music by Mychael Danna, has several wonderful songs with piano leads. I love the imaging in these recordings. I feel as if my ears are inside the piano. How were those done? That is the sad and unfortunate result of putting mikes close into the piano and panning them wide. I cannot stand the fifty-foot-piano effect. It sounds like your ears are inside the piano, and that's not how you listen to pianos in real life at all. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi kevin - thanks for the offer. yes, i'd like to read the pdf. you
can email it to me at jnorman34 at comcast.net. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Codifus wrote: I'm curious. The soundtrack from Antwone Fisher, featuring music by Mychael Danna, has several wonderful songs with piano leads. I love the imaging in these recordings. I feel as if my ears are inside the piano. How were those done? That is the sad and unfortunate result of putting mikes close into the piano and panning them wide. I cannot stand the fifty-foot-piano effect. It sounds like your ears are inside the piano, and that's not how you listen to pianos in real life at all. I would like to hear a concert pianists response to this. Since that is indeed how they hear the piano as they play it. Do they prefer to hear pianos as an audience hears it? Or the way they do when they play? My experience with their choice in having the lid up or down or half-stick sometimes indicates that they are doing that way because they prefer the sound from their vantage point. But would they do so if they had to listen to it from 20 feet way and get that mushy closed lid sound? Maybe the next time a pianist wants to play with a closed lid, I should put the mics behind his head. Rob R. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob Reedijk wrote in
: I would like to hear a concert pianists response to this. Since that is indeed how they hear the piano as they play it. Do they prefer to hear pianos as an audience hears it? Or the way they do when they play? I don't qualify as a concert performer, but I recognize the differences between what I hear at the keyboard and what the audience hears. I don't want them exposed to the pedal noise, the felt on the strings, and the action noise, not to mention the wide stereo sound. Still, being that close is an important part of hearing what I play with maximum accuracy so I can adjust as needed to the instrument, the room, the audience, time of day, barometric pressure, whatever. It isn't much different from playing a violin, calmly assured that what the audience hears is much more pleasant than the sound at my ears. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Lorin!
Bucky Burro is smiling and nodding his approval as if to say, "Ahhh, Lorin is finally catching on...." :) Mono rules! Cheers, Rick Novak. Lorin David Schultz wrote: This past week we had Pat Metheny on one of our shows with a bass player. After some noodling around with various stereo setups, Don (the mixer) decided that the best sound was both instruments mono dead centre with a little stereo 'verb. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Scott Dorsey wrote: Codifus wrote: I'm curious. The soundtrack from Antwone Fisher, featuring music by Mychael Danna, has several wonderful songs with piano leads. I love the imaging in these recordings. I feel as if my ears are inside the piano. How were those done? That is the sad and unfortunate result of putting mikes close into the piano and panning them wide. I cannot stand the fifty-foot-piano effect. It sounds like your ears are inside the piano, and that's not how you listen to pianos in real life at all. I liked to use crossed cardiods positioned pointing to the far end of the piano with placement just over the keyboards. Then another mike pointing to the keyboard/vocalist. The pair isolated the vocal from the piano tracks and gave a nice real stereo sound, and the vocal mike kept the piano out of the vox mike. When I could do it I'd use a C-24 a few feet away from the piano. Close miking a piano takes away so much and you can often tell where the mikes are placed by the hot notes in the mix. -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Vermillion" wrote:
Close miking a piano takes away so much and you can often tell where the mikes are placed by the hot notes in the mix. If you're getting hot notes you're not compressing it hard enough. g -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lorin David Schultz" wrote in message news:d_m0e.103718$fc4.34102@edtnps89... "Bill Vermillion" wrote: Close miking a piano takes away so much and you can often tell where the mikes are placed by the hot notes in the mix. If you're getting hot notes you're not compressing it hard enough. g Ouch.... ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Some Mixing Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Recording Piano- PDF available on request | Pro Audio | |||
Bouncing Stereo vs Dual Mono | Pro Audio | |||
vintage sony fm tuner- no stereo, only mono! | Tech |