Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. Many thanks! George |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
George wrote:
Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Record what? How many channels of info? At what resolution? That determines how much data must be stored. Preferably small. If this for PI work? -- ha |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
George wrote:
Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. MP3 at 48kbits is 21.6 mbytes per hour (using 1000 = k like the HD manufacturers do.) That's a tad over 518 mbytes per day. Check out some of the Archos boxes, but you might need to find one that will run Rockbox firmware to get around the firmware limits. Creative stops after something like 3-4 hours I think, so this might be your most important item. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? All operating systems have some limit to maximum file size. I suppose the first think to look at is how low could you go in quality. If you record at a low sample rate and low resolution, then compress on the fly, you might be able to squeeze two weeks worth of recording into something that an operating system could handle. Many filesystems these days use 64-bit files. A 32-bit file can be 2 GB in size, so a 64-bit one can be about 4 billion times as big as that, in other words about 8 million terabytes. That should be enough space to record 32 channels of 192 kHz 24-bit for about 31,700 years. But I don't have the knowledge or patience to run the numbers. Arny probably does. How bad would it have to be in order to fit a say 170 hours of recording into a gigabyte? It would be pretty darned bad. That's 1,209,600 seconds, and a gigabyte is about a billion, so it leaves just under one kilobyte to record a second's worth of audio. So, you can record 1 kHz sampling rate with 8 bit samples, 2 kHz sample rate with 4 bit samples, etc., etc. However, I've heard stuff recorded with 56 kilobit/s MP3 at 22050 Hz, and it wasn't atrociously bad. So 56 kilobit is only 7 kilobytes per second, which is about one order of magnitude worse than you'd need to fit in one gigabyte. But, that means you should be able to fit it in 10 gigabytes if you want relatively low quality. If you go up to 128 kilobit/s MP3, you're still only talking about around 20 GB of storage. So, this is something that could easily be done by a computer. All you'd need to do is compress on the fly. That'll probably require a relatively fast processor, but the software does exist. You could use, for instance, Linux or Unix with lame to do the encoding and some command line program (audiorecord on Solaris) to do the recording. Come to think of it, though, I'm not sure if the MP3 format itself can support files bigger than 2 GB. So, you might have to break it up, but that's not a big deal. If you were going the command-line Unix route, you could do something like this to automatically break it up into 500 MB increments: seqnum=1 audiorecord -c 1 -s 44100 -e linear | while true do dd ibs=512 count=1000000 of="$seqnum".raw touch "$sequnum".raw.done seqnum=`expr "$seqnum" + 1` done Then all you've got to do is have an MP3 encoder, like LAME for instance, come along behind that and encode every .raw file once it sees the corresponding .raw.done file has been created. So, it's kind of ugly and not user-friendly, but it certainly can be done. - Logan |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What are you trying to do? If you plan on recording for two weeks but
really are only looking for a snippet of audio out of it all you should consider using one of those digital hand held recorders that have a setting where silience is not recorded, that would save you a lot of space if you're going to be setting this up is a realtivly quiet area and know what ever you want to record will be a lot louder than it's natural ambient surroundings. To record continuously for two weeks straight, the smallest your're gonna get is a laptop plus mic and preamp. In other words, not that small. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
George wrote:
Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Check logging recorder manufacturers like Eventide and Minicom. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? All operating systems have some limit to maximum file size. I suppose the first think to look at is how low could you go in quality. If you record at a low sample rate and low resolution, then compress on the fly, you might be able to squeeze two weeks worth of recording into something that an operating system could handle. But I don't have the knowledge or patience to run the numbers. Arny probably does. How bad would it have to be in order to fit a say 170 hours of recording into a gigabyte? It isn't necessary to fit all the sound into a single file. Some recorders automatically break a long take into multiple files on the fly. At 32K/16 bit, a two week take would require 77.4 GB. That isn't tiny, but is certainly within the limits of readily available disk drives. The Sound Devices 744T has a 60 GB capacity, so it almost gets there. It also has an option (not quite ready yet) to compress to MP3 on the fly. It may also be possible to fit it with a larger disk. That would make it work admirably for the task. At 1.8" x 8.2" x 4.9" it is reasonably small, but it would require external power. It also mounts as a FireWire drive, making its recording immediately available on a PC. Of course, the 744T isn't cheap, but the OP didn't specify any budget limitation ;-) Is your next question going to be about some software that can recognize certain audio events, or do you actually plan to listen to this? Although it wouldn't be directly loadable into a PC, you might want to look into logging recorders. There are digital ones now, but the old analog ones ran 1/2" tape at 15/16 IPS and automatically switched through 16 or more tracks at the end of a pass. Quality? You know when they play a 911 call on a crime or rescue TV show? -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
just think how much fun it will be to have to listen back to two weeks
worth of recording. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George" wrote in message
om Hi, Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuously for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. AFAIK the maximum length of a recording on a Nomad Jukebox 3 portable is primarily limited by disk space - which can easily reach 60 GB. If you record using one of the low bitrate MP3 formats, the data rate could be as low as 0.5 megs per minute or less. 60 GB could then hold about 120,000 minutes of recorded audio. I believe the resulting recording will span multiple files whose name is based on a time-stamp related to when the particular segment file commenced recording. I understand that there will be no interruptions in the concatenation of these files. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just curious....what are you recording?
"George" wrote in message om... Hi, Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. Many thanks! George |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Logan Shaw wrote in message ...
Mike Rivers wrote: In article writes: Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? All operating systems have some limit to maximum file size. I suppose the first think to look at is how low could you go in quality. If you record at a low sample rate and low resolution, then compress on the fly, you might be able to squeeze two weeks worth of recording into something that an operating system could handle. Many filesystems these days use 64-bit files. A 32-bit file can be 2 GB in size, so a 64-bit one can be about 4 billion times as big as that, in other words about 8 million terabytes. That should be enough space to record 32 channels of 192 kHz 24-bit for about 31,700 years. But I don't have the knowledge or patience to run the numbers. Arny probably does. How bad would it have to be in order to fit a say 170 hours of recording into a gigabyte? It would be pretty darned bad. That's 1,209,600 seconds, and a gigabyte is about a billion, so it leaves just under one kilobyte to record a second's worth of audio. So, you can record 1 kHz sampling rate with 8 bit samples, 2 kHz sample rate with 4 bit samples, etc., etc. However, I've heard stuff recorded with 56 kilobit/s MP3 at 22050 Hz, and it wasn't atrociously bad. So 56 kilobit is only 7 kilobytes per second, which is about one order of magnitude worse than you'd need to fit in one gigabyte. But, that means you should be able to fit it in 10 gigabytes if you want relatively low quality. If you go up to 128 kilobit/s MP3, you're still only talking about around 20 GB of storage. So, this is something that could easily be done by a computer. All you'd need to do is compress on the fly. That'll probably require a relatively fast processor, but the software does exist. You could use, for instance, Linux or Unix with lame to do the encoding and some command line program (audiorecord on Solaris) to do the recording. Come to think of it, though, I'm not sure if the MP3 format itself can support files bigger than 2 GB. So, you might have to break it up, but that's not a big deal. If you were going the command-line Unix route, you could do something like this to automatically break it up into 500 MB increments: seqnum=1 audiorecord -c 1 -s 44100 -e linear | while true do dd ibs=512 count=1000000 of="$seqnum".raw touch "$sequnum".raw.done seqnum=`expr "$seqnum" + 1` done Then all you've got to do is have an MP3 encoder, like LAME for instance, come along behind that and encode every .raw file once it sees the corresponding .raw.done file has been created. So, it's kind of ugly and not user-friendly, but it certainly can be done. - Logan Hi, Thanks. I know about the possibility of writing to a PC but the problem is the size. I had a look at the Palms but they do not seem to have a hard disk. I am not sure if I can connect one externaly. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Anson wrote in message ...
Mike Rivers wrote: In article writes: Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? All operating systems have some limit to maximum file size. I suppose the first think to look at is how low could you go in quality. If you record at a low sample rate and low resolution, then compress on the fly, you might be able to squeeze two weeks worth of recording into something that an operating system could handle. But I don't have the knowledge or patience to run the numbers. Arny probably does. How bad would it have to be in order to fit a say 170 hours of recording into a gigabyte? It isn't necessary to fit all the sound into a single file. Some recorders automatically break a long take into multiple files on the fly. At 32K/16 bit, a two week take would require 77.4 GB. That isn't tiny, but is certainly within the limits of readily available disk drives. The Sound Devices 744T has a 60 GB capacity, so it almost gets there. It also has an option (not quite ready yet) to compress to MP3 on the fly. It may also be possible to fit it with a larger disk. That would make it work admirably for the task. At 1.8" x 8.2" x 4.9" it is reasonably small, but it would require external power. It also mounts as a FireWire drive, making its recording immediately available on a PC. Of course, the 744T isn't cheap, but the OP didn't specify any budget limitation ;-) Is your next question going to be about some software that can recognize certain audio events, or do you actually plan to listen to this? Although it wouldn't be directly loadable into a PC, you might want to look into logging recorders. There are digital ones now, but the old analog ones ran 1/2" tape at 15/16 IPS and automatically switched through 16 or more tracks at the end of a pass. Quality? You know when they play a 911 call on a crime or rescue TV show? -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo Sound Devices 744T is really big. Any smaller one that you know, eg portable. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ...
"George" wrote in message om Hi, Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuously for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. AFAIK the maximum length of a recording on a Nomad Jukebox 3 portable is primarily limited by disk space - which can easily reach 60 GB. If you record using one of the low bitrate MP3 formats, the data rate could be as low as 0.5 megs per minute or less. 60 GB could then hold about 120,000 minutes of recorded audio. I believe the resulting recording will span multiple files whose name is based on a time-stamp related to when the particular segment file commenced recording. I understand that there will be no interruptions in the concatenation of these files. Hi, This may be a solution. Have you tried it yourself when you say that the length is limited by the hard disk. As others have mentioned, the file size is limited by the operating system or firmware. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kurt Albershardt wrote in message ...
George wrote: Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. MP3 at 48kbits is 21.6 mbytes per hour (using 1000 = k like the HD manufacturers do.) That's a tad over 518 mbytes per day. Check out some of the Archos boxes, but you might need to find one that will run Rockbox firmware to get around the firmware limits. Creative stops after something like 3-4 hours I think, so this might be your most important item. Hi, Thanks. I have posted a message on Rockbox as I am not sure if it could start automaticaly a new recording when the file size gets 2GB. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
George wrote:
Kurt Albershardt wrote in message ... George wrote: Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. MP3 at 48kbits is 21.6 mbytes per hour (using 1000 = k like the HD manufacturers do.) That's a tad over 518 mbytes per day. Check out some of the Archos boxes, but you might need to find one that will run Rockbox firmware to get around the firmware limits. Creative stops after something like 3-4 hours I think, so this might be your most important item. Thanks. I have posted a message on Rockbox as I am not sure if it could start automaticaly a new recording when the file size gets 2GB. AFAIK nearly all of the portables will start a new file, most of them are adjustable as to how often that happens (1G, 2G, number of hours, etc.) What I'm not sure of is how long they will record in total--I seem to remember some limits in some of the firmware (10 hours, something like that.) |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "George" wrote in message om... Hi, Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. If this is speech, the generally accepted standards for good intelligibility are 8kb/s. This results in 288 hours/GB. Therefore a 1200MB file will hold 2 weeks of speech. I have an iRiver IFP-799, a very small recorder that will hold 1000MB, or 288 hours of speech. Unfortunately, it's battery operated, and the battery won't last 288 hours. You could get close by substituting a D cell for the AA cell it normally uses, but this would double the size of the recorder, which isn't as large as a D cell to begin with! Norm Strong |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George" wrote in message
om "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "George" wrote in message om Hi, Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuously for 2 weeks - non stop? Preferably small. AFAIK the maximum length of a recording on a Nomad Jukebox 3 portable is primarily limited by disk space - which can easily reach 60 GB. If you record using one of the low bitrate MP3 formats, the data rate could be as low as 0.5 megs per minute or less. 60 GB could then hold about 120,000 minutes of recorded audio. I believe the resulting recording will span multiple files whose name is based on a time-stamp related to when the particular segment file commenced recording. I understand that there will be no interruptions in the concatenation of these files. This may be a solution. Have you tried it yourself when you say that the length is limited by the hard disk. As others have mentioned, the file size is limited by the operating system or firmware. No I haven't had to record somthing long enough to cause the generation of mulitple files. The files are limited in size as others have said, but the NJB3 automatically creates a new file when the old one gets too large. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the info.
|
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I am afraid this is not true. ie that all portables start a new file when the current gets big. I had an Ipod 40GB and could only write upto a 2GB file, then it freezes. Thats the problem.. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
8Kbps I have tried but gives distorted sound. The min acceptable I found is 16Kbps.
|
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
George wrote: 8Kbps I have tried but gives distorted sound. The min acceptable I found is 16Kbps. It's all a matter of tradeoffs. You can get better sound or you can get longer running time. If you're recording police calls, you may want better fidelity in order to catch off-mike chatter, than you would want if you were recording a competing broadcast station where all you needed to do was identify the songs. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George" wrote:
Is there any digital recorder, (and by that I mean anyone that records on a hard disk or RAM memory which could be then loaded on a PC), which can record continuosly for 2 weeks - non stop? Yes, consider our PDAudio recorder running Gidluck Mastering's Live2496. It's likely that it can be configured to record for that long. There's already version of lIve2496 that will soon be used for recording continuously for short intervals, unattended, over three or four days. -- Len Moskowitz PDAudio, Binaural Mics, Cables, DPA, M-Audio Core Sound http://www.stealthmicrophones.com Teaneck, New Jersey USA http://www.core-sound.com Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912 |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() George wrote: I am afraid this is not true. ie that all portables start a new file when the current gets big. I had an Ipod 40GB and could only write upto a 2GB file, then it freezes. Thats the problem.. And when the ones that can start new files do so, they lose data during that interval. All, that is, except PDAudio running Gidluck Mastering's Live2496. -- Len Moskowitz PDAudio, Binaural Mics, Cables, DPA, M-Audio Core Sound http://www.stealthmicrophones.com Teaneck, New Jersey USA http://www.core-sound.com Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Question FAQ: rec.audio.* Recording 2/99 (part 7 of 13) | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |