On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:45:25 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:15:32 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Nick Gorham" wrote in message


You could try http://www.scott-nixon.com/dac.htm, I know of someone
building one, but as yet no reports.

I'm *surprised* that none of our local HTML gurus have pointed out
the incompetent design of this web site. It's pretty obvious if you
click any of the links on the home page.

Actually, I'm not surprised at all, because these losers only go
into HTML critic mode if they disagree with the author or subject
matter on the site.

You mean like you're doing right now?

Wrong. I'd have pointed out the incompetent design regardless of the site's
content.

So you say. Why haven't you pointed out your *own* incompetent design
then?

BTW, the design of the noted web site would be better served by
individual pages instead of one long scrolling page. The fact that
each link takes you to the top of the page isn't particularly onerous,
and could be corrected pretty easily. I assume that's what you're
talking about in terms of "incompetence". It's still a lot easier to
get the information on that web site than trying to negotiate through
your web of information.

*Your* web sites are an alarming mishmash of formatting and design
cues, veritable Frankensteins of web sites.

Thanks for pointing out a good example of such despicable behavior,
Arnold!

You're just making this up as you go along, Weil.

Nope. You're being disengenuous when you claim to to picking on this
web sitefor any other reason other than the fact that you despise tube
techonolgy. There's no other reason why you'd go to the lengths you
have to pick on a site that is generally pretty cleanly designed (from
a visual standpoint).