trotsky flubs his simple assignment.

Bob, you are getting slanderous here. If we need to take this to the
legal system, we can.


Those are clearly opinions.



In your opinion. Which you stated as fact.


Sorry, you lose. Whether a statement is an opinion or a fact is a
matter of fact, not opinion. It's a fact that Bobo's statements are
opinions. But if you truly disagree, why don't you explicitly tell
us which of his statements are not opinions. Here they are again:

1. trotsky, you are phony and disingenous.

2. Your "company" has no technical standards at all.

3. Indeed, you make a mockery of the high end.

Which one (or ones) are the non-opinions?


George, you're interesting, but only interesting in the way that peeling
off a painful scab is interesting.

Which one (or ones) are the non-opinions?

If the subject line of this thread
isn't slander, I don't know what is.

Changing the subject again.

But please, if you can tell us
more about your credentials as a lawyer, English teacher, or whatever,
please do.

Random nonsequitur.


Hey, here's a deal: I'll trade you my own personal blatherskite
("Lionel") for Bobo and fake-Bobo. Deal?